Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #12901 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2020-09-28 02:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2020-10-06 20:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 8 — 7 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python
Policy proposal: Consistent use of UNRELEASED in debian/changelog Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2020-09-28 02:10 +0200
Re: Policy proposal: Consistent use of UNRELEASED in debian/changelog Emmanuel Arias <emmanuelarias30@gmail.com> - 2020-09-28 02:40 +0200
Re: Policy proposal: Consistent use of UNRELEASED in debian/changelog Nick Morrott <knowledgejunkie@gmail.com> - 2020-09-28 02:50 +0200
Re: Policy proposal: Consistent use of UNRELEASED in debian/changelog Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2020-09-28 13:30 +0200
Re: Policy proposal: Consistent use of UNRELEASED in debian/changelog Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2020-09-28 15:00 +0200
Re: Policy proposal: Consistent use of UNRELEASED in debian/changelog Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2020-10-06 18:00 +0200
Re: Policy proposal: Consistent use of UNRELEASED in debian/changelog Jonathan Carter <jcc@debian.org> - 2020-10-06 18:10 +0200
Re: Policy proposal: Consistent use of UNRELEASED in debian/changelog Emmanuel Arias <eamanu@yaerobi.com> - 2020-10-06 20:40 +0200
| From | Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-28 02:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Policy proposal: Consistent use of UNRELEASED in debian/changelog |
| Message-ID | <ATOTT-8d6-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi! I am proposing a minor addition to the DPT policy to try to make the use of UNRELEASED in debian/changelog more consistent. The full diff can be found here [1]. The problem this tries to solves is inconsistent use of UNRELEASED in debian/changelog. Some people do not use it at all, and it can make working on team packages harder. Indeed, if you try to modify a package, if people don't use UNRELEASED, you first need to check if the current VCS version has been uploaded to the archive or not. This complicates the life of people doing mass updates, as they can't rely on packages with `unstable` having been uploaded. This be can seen for example in the latest batch of updates by onovy, where new versions of a package were made instead of marking changes as addition to a yet to be released version, because some packages were marked `unstable` but hadn't been uploaded. I don't think it's a lot to ask and will surely make team contributions more pleasant :) Cheers, [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/-/merge_requests/15 -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ pollo@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Emmanuel Arias <emmanuelarias30@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-28 02:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ATPmV-8mm-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #12901 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi, El dom., 27 de sep. de 2020 a la(s) 21:08, Louis-Philippe Véronneau ( pollo@debian.org) escribió: > Hi! > > I am proposing a minor addition to the DPT policy to try to make the use > of UNRELEASED in debian/changelog more consistent. The full diff can be > found here [1]. > > The problem this tries to solves is inconsistent use of UNRELEASED in > debian/changelog. Some people do not use it at all, and it can make > working on team packages harder. > > Indeed, if you try to modify a package, if people don't use UNRELEASED, > you first need to check if the current VCS version has been uploaded to > the archive or not. This complicates the life of people doing mass > updates, as they can't rely on packages with `unstable` having been > uploaded. > > This be can seen for example in the latest batch of updates by onovy, > where new versions of a package were made instead of marking changes as > addition to a yet to be released version, because some packages were > marked `unstable` but hadn't been uploaded. > > I don't think it's a lot to ask and will surely make team contributions > more pleasant :) > > Yes, +1 for this please. Cheers, eamanu Cheers, > > [1]: > > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/-/merge_requests/15 > > -- > ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ > ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau > ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ pollo@debian.org / veronneau.org > ⠈⠳⣄ > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nick Morrott <knowledgejunkie@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-28 02:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ATPwC-8pw-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #12901 |
On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 01:08, Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> wrote: > > Hi! > > I am proposing a minor addition to the DPT policy to try to make the use > of UNRELEASED in debian/changelog more consistent. The full diff can be > found here +1. Seems to match what we do in the Perl team. Thanks, Nick
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-28 13:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ATZvY-64y-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #12901 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 08:07:29PM -0400, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
> The problem this tries to solves is inconsistent use of UNRELEASED in
> debian/changelog. Some people do not use it at all, and it can make
> working on team packages harder.
>
> Indeed, if you try to modify a package, if people don't use UNRELEASED,
> you first need to check if the current VCS version has been uploaded to
> the archive or not. This complicates the life of people doing mass
> updates, as they can't rely on packages with `unstable` having been
> uploaded.
I just want to point people towards the fact that the Janitor's is now
being clever about recognizing whether a package is using `gbp dch`
(which I believe is the case you refer to when you say that UNRELEASED
is not used), or changelog entires are added whenever a change is done.
That said, I acknoledge that it makes sense to converge on a single
solution for the whole team, and honestly I don't have much of a strong
preference towards either one.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-28 15:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <AU0V3-6Na-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #12901 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi, po 28. 9. 2020 v 2:08 odesílatel Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> napsal: > Hi! > > I am proposing a minor addition to the DPT policy to try to make the use > of UNRELEASED in debian/changelog more consistent. The full diff can be > found here [1]. > I agree with this proposal but please change the wording a bit as per rfc2119 :) -- Best regards Ondřej Nový
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-06 18:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <AWXxE-38C-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #12905 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On 2020-09-28 08 h 40, Ondrej Novy wrote: > Hi, > > po 28. 9. 2020 v 2:08 odesílatel Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> > napsal: > >> Hi! >> >> I am proposing a minor addition to the DPT policy to try to make the use >> of UNRELEASED in debian/changelog more consistent. The full diff can be >> found here [1]. >> > > I agree with this proposal but please change the wording a bit as > per rfc2119 :) > Thanks for all the comments and improvements people proposed. Ondřej merged my MR last night, so it's now part of policy. Cheers, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ pollo@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jonathan Carter <jcc@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-06 18:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <AWXHk-3rb-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #12927 |
On 2020/10/06 17:53, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote: > Thanks for all the comments and improvements people proposed. > > Ondřej merged my MR last night, so it's now part of policy. Yay! Thanks! -Jonathan -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) <jcc> ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ https://wiki.debian.org/highvoltage ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ https://debian.org | https://jonathancarter.org ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ Debian, the universal operating system.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Emmanuel Arias <eamanu@yaerobi.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-06 20:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <AX02t-4HH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #12928 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 1:03 PM Jonathan Carter <jcc@debian.org> wrote: > On 2020/10/06 17:53, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote: > > Thanks for all the comments and improvements people proposed. > > > > Ondřej merged my MR last night, so it's now part of policy. > Great! > > Yay! Thanks! > > -Jonathan > > -- > ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) <jcc> > ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ https://wiki.debian.org/highvoltage > ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ https://debian.org | https://jonathancarter.org > ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ Debian, the universal operating system. > >
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python
csiph-web