Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #12494
| From | Félix Sipma <felix+debian@gueux.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: [felix+debian@gueux.org: Bug#955862: RFS: sphinx-autoapi/1.2.1-1 [ITP]] |
| Date | 2020-04-19 19:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <zXlsu-rh-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <zXf3I-4Ut-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <zXk3o-893-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <zXk3n-893-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <zXkd4-8cj-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 2020-04-19 15:39+0000, Scott Kitterman wrote: >As a member of the FTP Team, I see this situation from time to time. It's usually not a serious problem, but I agree with Zigo on this. > >Where it becomes problematic is when code in debian/ becomes intermingled with the installed upstream code. One has to look at the license of both upstream and debian/ to determine the effective license of the package. If the licenses are incompatible, then the binary isn't distributable. I have seen this happen. > >Aligning the license of the packaging with the upstream license makes it all much simpler. > >... OK, it makes sense. Thanks for the rationale! >If you intend to maintain this package in DPMT or PAPT, we have a standard gbp.conf for the teams that doesn't include this, so it would be inappropriate. In any case, it's the default for a format 3.0(Quilt) source package, so there's no need for it anyway: > >https://manpages.debian.org/testing/git-buildpackage/gbp-import-orig.1.en.html > >Scott K OK. I removed the setting. -- Félix
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[felix+debian@gueux.org: Bug#955862: RFS: sphinx-autoapi/1.2.1-1 [ITP]] Félix Sipma <felix+debian@gueux.org> - 2020-04-19 12:10 +0200
Re: [felix+debian@gueux.org: Bug#955862: RFS: sphinx-autoapi/1.2.1-1 [ITP]] Félix Sipma <felix+debian@gueux.org> - 2020-04-19 17:30 +0200
Re: [felix+debian@gueux.org: Bug#955862: RFS: sphinx-autoapi/1.2.1-1 [ITP]] Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2020-04-19 17:40 +0200
Re: [felix+debian@gueux.org: Bug#955862: RFS: sphinx-autoapi/1.2.1-1 [ITP]] Félix Sipma <felix+debian@gueux.org> - 2020-04-19 19:00 +0200
Re: [felix+debian@gueux.org: Bug#955862: RFS: sphinx-autoapi/1.2.1-1 [ITP]] Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2020-04-19 22:20 +0200
Re: [felix+debian@gueux.org: Bug#955862: RFS: sphinx-autoapi/1.2.1-1 [ITP]] Félix Sipma <felix+debian@gueux.org> - 2020-04-20 11:20 +0200
Re: [felix+debian@gueux.org: Bug#955862: RFS: sphinx-autoapi/1.2.1-1 [ITP]] Félix Sipma <felix+debian@gueux.org> - 2020-04-20 11:20 +0200
Re: [felix+debian@gueux.org: Bug#955862: RFS: sphinx-autoapi/1.2.1-1 [ITP]] Félix Sipma <felix+debian@gueux.org> - 2020-04-20 14:50 +0200
Re: [felix+debian@gueux.org: Bug#955862: RFS: sphinx-autoapi/1.2.1-1 [ITP]] Félix Sipma <felix+debian@gueux.org> - 2020-04-20 16:40 +0200
Re: [felix+debian@gueux.org: Bug#955862: RFS: sphinx-autoapi/1.2.1-1 [ITP]] Félix Sipma <felix+debian@gueux.org> - 2020-04-21 11:20 +0200
csiph-web