Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #12496

Re: [felix+debian@gueux.org: Bug#955862: RFS: sphinx-autoapi/1.2.1-1 [ITP]]

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On 2020-04-19 21:50+0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>On 4/19/20 5:24 PM, Félix Sipma wrote:
>> I hope I fixed the issues you found
>
>Not really... :(

Let's try again, then...

>Now the package is 2.7 MB, out of which the extracted library is only
>380 KB. Now, the extracted documentation is 3.5 MB and contains 3 MB of
>fonts, like fontawesome and lato, which are already part of Debian.
>
>If everyone was doing like you, installing a small python app would
>download gigabytes of packages! :)
>
>Please:
>1/ Push the docs into a separate package that you could call
>python-sphinx-autoapi-doc.
>2/ Remove the embedded fonts fonts from that -doc package, and create
>symlinks to the appropriate files in the fonts-font-awesome and
>fonts-lato package.
>
>One little general advice now: use mc (or something similar) to go
>within the resulting .deb files after you've built them, so you can
>check its content. If you did that, you would have find the issues I'm
>describing above.

For sure, getting a 2.7MB package for this small library is not good. I 
do display the list of the files after I build them, but I admit I 
usually don't look too closely to these, and rely on lintian warnings to 
see if fonts package are incorrectly embedded, if the resulting doc is 
too big and should be put to a separate package, etc. Maybe something 
changed recently on lintian (or in my config, but the warnings were not 
displayed on https://mentors.debian.net/package/sphinx-autoapi either) 
because I do not get the embedded fonts warnings I used to have...

The resulting package is much smaller, I don't think it justifies 
another -doc package. Do you agree?

Regards,

-- 
Félix

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[felix+debian@gueux.org: Bug#955862: RFS: sphinx-autoapi/1.2.1-1  [ITP]] Félix Sipma <felix+debian@gueux.org> - 2020-04-19 12:10 +0200
  Re: [felix+debian@gueux.org: Bug#955862: RFS: sphinx-autoapi/1.2.1-1  [ITP]] Félix Sipma <felix+debian@gueux.org> - 2020-04-19 17:30 +0200
    Re: [felix+debian@gueux.org: Bug#955862: RFS: sphinx-autoapi/1.2.1-1 [ITP]] Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2020-04-19 17:40 +0200
      Re: [felix+debian@gueux.org: Bug#955862: RFS: sphinx-autoapi/1.2.1-1  [ITP]] Félix Sipma <felix+debian@gueux.org> - 2020-04-19 19:00 +0200
    Re: [felix+debian@gueux.org: Bug#955862: RFS: sphinx-autoapi/1.2.1-1  [ITP]] Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2020-04-19 22:20 +0200
      Re: [felix+debian@gueux.org: Bug#955862: RFS: sphinx-autoapi/1.2.1-1  [ITP]] Félix Sipma <felix+debian@gueux.org> - 2020-04-20 11:20 +0200
    Re: [felix+debian@gueux.org: Bug#955862: RFS: sphinx-autoapi/1.2.1-1  [ITP]] Félix Sipma <felix+debian@gueux.org> - 2020-04-20 11:20 +0200
      Re: [felix+debian@gueux.org: Bug#955862: RFS: sphinx-autoapi/1.2.1-1  [ITP]] Félix Sipma <felix+debian@gueux.org> - 2020-04-20 14:50 +0200
        Re: [felix+debian@gueux.org: Bug#955862: RFS: sphinx-autoapi/1.2.1-1  [ITP]] Félix Sipma <felix+debian@gueux.org> - 2020-04-20 16:40 +0200
          Re: [felix+debian@gueux.org: Bug#955862: RFS: sphinx-autoapi/1.2.1-1  [ITP]] Félix Sipma <felix+debian@gueux.org> - 2020-04-21 11:20 +0200

csiph-web