Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #11815

Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing?

Path csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!news.albasani.net!tahina.priv.at!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@jelmer.uk>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing?
Date Sun, 15 Sep 2019 17:40:02 +0200
Message-ID <yGEN4-2WN-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <yGpuF-13N-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <yGpuF-13N-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <yGyHE-7sE-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <yGBPb-10n-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sun Sep 15 15:35:02 2019
Old-Return-Path <jelmer@jelmer.uk>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-7.1 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -4.6
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=jelmer.uk; s=default; t=1568560687; bh=iHkjPtOUzA0I4pG5B9k9Hn//5uRyugluvPtDHfWVsTA=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:CC:From; b=1M7dbsejPOqcBj/nWjVtiPA1gjTR0E2zUyR+yaaD9nEo79VPRx4IRRb2Ll2ZFHLh6 Sfl4SNCwyJ3rN4YrxkIdiDGAwshQT7sJiZooEZkYoEVB9FNkB5oG2Jx2jbtFCPBTwY JkKb0IEWomxWFnzPeqoZaiV5WOQo1odUJntA/SOk=
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
Autocrypt addr=jelmer@jelmer.uk; keydata= mQGNBFw4CgUBDADqWVCPPb7oOxSr0L0iuFWJx4xp/t+Mk8vg+QNDfuWPfGpkmsG6+ssDtLDALXcz vwlmSb/kBHLpb+gyWpZH/90xOZKx8/CjluMpxqEEsXUqnnShLegFfQA1Cs8oI3OEWAxnJSc4om05 xYJnIJXHGG2ZDbUgN2KF3vCeoMo0+A8tOOd28vR5Uws4ugxRq2MlXOk44Xfubj5eaA+TDl3FGGuy N3xZM/JR4l18DYydUbI/FIOWL30ZuXiJbnA6PclUaIEqrzY77ph37XSgw4lVF+OIjYb3O/nBZFBb HdLWF7bZxP4ghC1wgCWvGQ4/fd7NoFhl9wJ9Qhs7rm3HSc2P7JDup+UMKbzwGA1zUmafzGHW/5Kq cOL8V2dUAb/7aE5Oaeu/OkVAvRgI4WaHpBn/XskYKV3qhBc0Yt33BG148BiS8V0eEhVjK/fprrU+ K71Tk9Ffk+EKg1EHB/E5FXBchumAiXTk7nKM1JYdFqw607hCvQQFcPC8mYoKp07Stbg/A+EAEQEA AbQQamVsbWVyQGplbG1lci51a4kBsAQTAQoAGgQLCQgHAhUKAhYBAhkABYJcOAoFAp4BApsDAAoJ EEo3JaKm8W3SGWsMAJvwX96NN3umQXHOHrzEesGHHnQaqRpYQbc8lRVi7KuYBHS9Xiy3ByCix22F YMA4rPo8QY01FCs/gM66flL5CC8Jp5d4wCDVjrXTadW5VSVPv3if0hwfkvkh3ISkq2Y+pU4CTbsh cun7SSspRYhVhr/+BIgag7CbTGbSIevDopWu0cVQEUaiN+3xT6In5jMCq11h/UTHlitUK6Ut4DGP 0wSxWLSBLkDSpXl6s9O6DK4ZU3LYrA0OouLlLLUvLhkWICthe+m3UGfbsfNM483N/5oBPRyier+p PGWPakNFdA+GT8WUcpnOqQDSI04cjvYX1L1ZoWTW5cK4zsXs7VAc/B/yyjrCw9PhJNze3+AlXPIg 2sw3R5qcFAkwXebpxmB3vPvjJKJNEHmJbSXkm921k9LdeqsbmzNPZGFcccckg8VZSZDEa9nEluW4 1JwHlYtuCMuu/2eoqp6efZ9wjG6WOhbOmo4VKMSuSGu9eK/gns/HHy9p225+DysR5oOAiG1DZLkB jQRcOAoFAQwA2Ipu1qvuY+3A0PozSONNZB5VD1Bm/ZDnFce9scmSr7xh3phzw0iiqJ0bj2Ia7f4r 4An0ld5ENdJurIokZloJV92891QsV0pao13jngOaWZI2Iyv+fA91lRJA2Q4GVAsqKF1hLAO9Yth4 lf/yMlBKyFSV/PR8vRw7za030VW0nVYKwqEL1N1Cvzt6PmofSepV2CCC6LvfbtfA+lTr4tZ4k4lN EJLGx9deSH3Ph4gu4DU0Vo7rk1GS2MlEMYgi8IwYPlDTYie2sklq+JWLqO4PaVi0H49xWbPNuwFS V5xk9IeisKMWkmu+0Elxo+k6nCiXr93phbt2hjkQ7Dg9VMp9N+fJpHjvzhGbZ07smVdzlVcDcEOV fpNalXxvjGZ+cb08YSBFvx8t18W3YXLQFy7D4c6T7/9R3x0eni/Gs2v6Al976BnjB65t6ETGFGdF aImHRAHQhk7Gj2EL5z9m9l8LjKjpBSEPixgm/fLaj6MInRPUkgWMBM5t6T3J2e6zzLRXABEBAAGJ AZ8EGAEKAAkFglw4CgUCmwwACgkQSjcloqbxbdLf2Av+Nw0192Orzx64Rvycc6WHavy/tzC2DMP6 j/63EWhjkZJ1LruBj5rP5Tt0M/7GQ75RQOj7RZdRS6kb2hW4jQYnirWuHiXj07Y/611HpoPYTog+ heYcPT67A2QkuOQJ3bk/c9MzOg+LFWRyztgoMYrmH+00UgA8IcfEhvuqKZLyD3sLHPniuivyDrP4 ojw22aj/Tj0NnXhdVEZmThwsY0fSZv1ZOSJ0JDxIjk3KtbM1sn2e8IvYNZkux5hoVnsmrU75KBFx 1/3DB+JpJY0u9O3XugRsSWAqmP6MTmTYwm7djeVGRtpcksLsVDBotk5C7OROuAS5YrwTohE75AtM d6iuA2rGXS5dTEs/noHoFrVwvnIXncPV7hMEj9Teeb6/4lZiF9kaMNSUDMqPt+tFdSVuhD5ldEhL KtgyWKu6sFJ5uoN4qJfj6r3b1mvPMl22NmCoNFfGR+DDh0NqLFaHJGghHKqGOgdA7ul70GzSqYRr IsiYf4k4F5qzy+LdykGp1CTM
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/17348
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/EEFC93E6-BB99-421F-A711-39E48E897844@jelmer.uk
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 100
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc debian-python <debian-python@lists.debian.org>,Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com>
X-Original-Date Sun, 15 Sep 2019 17:17:53 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <EEFC93E6-BB99-421F-A711-39E48E897844@jelmer.uk>
X-Original-References <5c8da6a2-309d-d8d8-e773-172a50b6e56e@debian.org> <2926378.PZRHtU5IR0@l5580> <DA3FA0BE-A4C8-41FF-9533-815FBE228603@jelmer.uk> <CAHKYmeuEkCGjdU5XvOxdfQa9h+KPwdEgQD5C8UrzfZY9gvTUUg@mail.gmail.com>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:11815

Show key headers only | View raw


It's not just bzr, it's also a bunch of plugins for bzr that we'd have to disable the testsuite for - as well as a bunch of other non-bzr-related packages - python-subunit, python-fixtures, python-testscenarios, python-daemon, python-fastimport.

Jelmer

On 15 September 2019 14:26:35 CEST, Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> wrote:
>Considering that this is bzr we are talking about, a package that is
>already entering the graveyard, I think it would be easiest to just
>disable
>the test suite and move on.
>
>But I would be happier it Thomas at least checked the rdeps before
>dropping
>packages, at least evaluating if breaking things is alrightif he really
>likes to break packages :/
>
>
>On Sun, 15 Sep 2019, 11:09 am Jelmer Vernooij, <jelmer@jelmer.uk>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 15 September 2019 01:15:11 CEST, Scott Kitterman
><debian@kitterman.com>
>> wrote:
>> >On Saturday, September 14, 2019 6:43:13 PM EDT Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> As I wrongly thought python-extras was used only by OpenStack
>stuff,
>> >I
>> >> removed Python 2 support for it. Then someone filed a bug against
>> >> python-testtools (ScottK, I believe) saying that it became RC.
>> >> Therefore, I went ahead and removed Python 2 support for
>testtools,
>> >but
>> >> now, this implies that a few packages which I didn't wish to
>impact
>> >are
>> >> also RC:
>> >>
>> >> * bzr-builddeb
>> >> * bzr-email
>> >> * bzr-fastimport
>> >> * bzr-git
>> >> * bzr-stats
>> >> * bzr-upload
>> >> * loggerhead
>> >>
>> >> So, basically, unfortunately, Bazaar has lost some of its build
>> >> dependencies.
>> >>
>> >> So, I went ahead, and looked what I could do for Bazaar.
>> >Unfortunately,
>> >> when looking at:
>> >> https://launchpad.net/bzr
>> >>
>> >> I can see no release since January 2016, no daily archive. The
>last
>> >> commit in the bzr repository of bzr is from 2017-03-17.
>> >>
>> >> Then I went to see how much Python 3 effort would be needed, and I
>> >> quickly gave up. It'd be A LOT of work, but nobody seems doing ANY
>> >work
>> >> on bzr anymore.
>> >>
>> >> So I wonder: is it time to remove bazaar from Debian? Or is there
>any
>> >> vague plan to make it work with Python 3? If we are to remove it
>from
>> >> Debian, then we'd better do it ASAP.
>> >
>> >As I understand it, bazaar (bzr) is dead and being replaced by
>breezy
>> >(brz),
>> >which is python3 compatible.
>> >
>> >https://www.breezy-vcs.org/
>> >
>> >My inference is that anything bzr specific can go, but I'm not
>involved
>> >in
>> >either project.
>>
>> Bzr maintainer / breezy upstream here.
>>
>> I'm planning to upload transitional packages to trigger upgrades from
>bzr
>> to Breezy.
>>
>> The packages for that are not ready yet though. Can we undo the
>dropping
>> of python-testtools in the meantime?
>>
>> Jelmer
>>
>>

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2019-09-15 01:20 +0200
  Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@jelmer.uk> - 2019-09-15 11:10 +0200
    Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2019-09-15 14:30 +0200
      Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@jelmer.uk> - 2019-09-15 17:40 +0200
      Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still  a thing? Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2019-09-16 00:40 +0200
        Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still  a thing? Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2019-09-16 09:20 +0200
          A possibly easier way to check dependencies for 2Removal? "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2019-09-18 00:20 +0200
            Re: A possibly easier way to check dependencies for 2Removal? Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2019-09-18 19:40 +0200
            Re: A possibly easier way to check dependencies for 2Removal? "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2019-10-26 20:30 +0200

csiph-web