Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #11812
| From | Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@jelmer.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? |
| Date | 2019-09-15 11:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <yGyHE-7sE-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <yGpuF-13N-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <yGpuF-13N-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 15 September 2019 01:15:11 CEST, Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> wrote: >On Saturday, September 14, 2019 6:43:13 PM EDT Thomas Goirand wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As I wrongly thought python-extras was used only by OpenStack stuff, >I >> removed Python 2 support for it. Then someone filed a bug against >> python-testtools (ScottK, I believe) saying that it became RC. >> Therefore, I went ahead and removed Python 2 support for testtools, >but >> now, this implies that a few packages which I didn't wish to impact >are >> also RC: >> >> * bzr-builddeb >> * bzr-email >> * bzr-fastimport >> * bzr-git >> * bzr-stats >> * bzr-upload >> * loggerhead >> >> So, basically, unfortunately, Bazaar has lost some of its build >> dependencies. >> >> So, I went ahead, and looked what I could do for Bazaar. >Unfortunately, >> when looking at: >> https://launchpad.net/bzr >> >> I can see no release since January 2016, no daily archive. The last >> commit in the bzr repository of bzr is from 2017-03-17. >> >> Then I went to see how much Python 3 effort would be needed, and I >> quickly gave up. It'd be A LOT of work, but nobody seems doing ANY >work >> on bzr anymore. >> >> So I wonder: is it time to remove bazaar from Debian? Or is there any >> vague plan to make it work with Python 3? If we are to remove it from >> Debian, then we'd better do it ASAP. > >As I understand it, bazaar (bzr) is dead and being replaced by breezy >(brz), >which is python3 compatible. > >https://www.breezy-vcs.org/ > >My inference is that anything bzr specific can go, but I'm not involved >in >either project. Bzr maintainer / breezy upstream here. I'm planning to upload transitional packages to trigger upgrades from bzr to Breezy. The packages for that are not ready yet though. Can we undo the dropping of python-testtools in the meantime? Jelmer
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2019-09-15 01:20 +0200
Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@jelmer.uk> - 2019-09-15 11:10 +0200
Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2019-09-15 14:30 +0200
Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@jelmer.uk> - 2019-09-15 17:40 +0200
Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2019-09-16 00:40 +0200
Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing? Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2019-09-16 09:20 +0200
A possibly easier way to check dependencies for 2Removal? "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2019-09-18 00:20 +0200
Re: A possibly easier way to check dependencies for 2Removal? Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org> - 2019-09-18 19:40 +0200
Re: A possibly easier way to check dependencies for 2Removal? "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2019-10-26 20:30 +0200
csiph-web