Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #11352

Re: python-scipy: autopkgtest fails (Re: bug#919929)

From Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python, linux.debian.devel.release, linux.debian.bugs.dist
Subject Re: python-scipy: autopkgtest fails (Re: bug#919929)
Date 2019-03-07 13:20 +0100
Message-ID <xz0ad-1Bh-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <xyg7o-6lM-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <xyWgh-7Dy-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <xyZ4t-XP-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization The Debian Project

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 2019-03-07 19:00, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Drew,
> 
> On 07-03-2019 09:03, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 07:01:54PM +0800, Drew Parsons wrote:
>>> python-scipy has recently started failing all debci tests in testing 
>>> and
>>> unstable, exacerbating the bug report in Bug#919929 [1].
>>> 
>>> The failing error is a MemoryError. But understanding the problem is
>>> hampered by a flood of deprecation warnings, presumably triggered by 
>>> numpy
>>> 1.16. scipy 1.2 added instructions to pytest.ini to ignore the 
>>> warnings.
>>> 
>>> Bug#919929 has not yet been marked RC but I guess it's about to 
>>> happen.
> 
> Can you elaborate why you think that bug should be RC (as that isn't
> clear to me from the report itself) and why you haven't marked it as
> such if you think it should be?

python-scipy is currently failing all debci tests in both unstable and 
testing.

I haven't marked it RC myself since I'm not 100% certain what the usual 
protocol is for marking the severity of debci test failures.  But as I 
understood it, debci test failures is considered RC under the final 
freeze which we're about to enter (but we're not quite in that deep 
freeze yet).


>>> I
>>> propose in the first instance to apply a patch of the pytest.ini diff
>>> between scipy 1.1 and 1.2 and see if that clears things up. I'll 
>>> commit the
>>> patch now. Should I proceed with upload to unstable?
>> 
>> May be its sensible to coordinate with debian-release (list in CC) and
>> file a unblock request *before* uploading.  I confirm that I usually
>> upload simple fixes and ask for unblock afterwards but you intend to 
>> do
>> a version change which does not qualify as simple fix (despite I agree
>> with you that it is sensible).

Hi Andreas, I may not have been clear.  What I mean at this point is to 
upload a small patch for scipy 1.1 to ignore the deprecation warnings 
(scipy 1.2 already does that).

If that doesn't help pass the debci tests then we can consider uploading 
scipy 1.2 instead.  But python-fluids and dipy FTBFS against scipy 1.2 
(a new version of dipy is available which presumeably fixes that)

> Slightly depending on the answer above, I'll unblock an upload of
> python-scipy with only that change.

Certainly please do unblock if the full freeze is already in place. But 
my intention was to first upload python-scipy 1.1 with a small patch, 
not 1.2 just yet.

Drew

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

python-scipy: autopkgtest fails (Re:bug#919929) Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org> - 2019-03-05 12:10 +0100
  Re: python-scipy: autopkgtest fails (Re: bug#919929) Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2019-03-07 09:10 +0100
    Re: python-scipy: autopkgtest fails (Re: bug#919929) Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2019-03-07 12:10 +0100
      Re: python-scipy: autopkgtest fails (Re: bug#919929) Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org> - 2019-03-07 13:20 +0100
        Re: python-scipy: autopkgtest fails (Re: bug#919929) Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2019-03-07 13:50 +0100
          Re: python-scipy: autopkgtest fails (Re: bug#919929) Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org> - 2019-03-07 15:00 +0100
            Re: python-scipy: autopkgtest fails (Re: bug#919929) Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2019-03-07 15:10 +0100
              Re: python-scipy: autopkgtest fails (Re: bug#919929) Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org> - 2019-03-07 15:30 +0100
          Re: python-scipy: autopkgtest fails (Re: bug#919929) Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org> - 2019-03-08 03:10 +0100
            Re: python-scipy: autopkgtest fails (Re: bug#919929) Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2019-03-09 21:00 +0100
              Re: python-scipy: autopkgtest fails (Re: bug#919929) Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org> - 2019-03-10 08:50 +0100
                Re: python-scipy: autopkgtest fails (Re: bug#919929) Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org> - 2019-03-11 07:50 +0100
                unblock request: python-scipy/1.1.0-4 skimage/0.14.2-2: autopkgtest  passes (Re: bug#919929) Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org> - 2019-03-16 13:50 +0100
                Re: unblock request: python-scipy/1.1.0-4 skimage/0.14.2-2:  autopkgtest passes (Re: bug#919929) Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2019-03-16 15:10 +0100
                Re: unblock request: python-scipy/1.1.0-4 skimage/0.14.2-2:  autopkgtest passes (Re: bug#919929) Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org> - 2019-03-16 17:00 +0100

csiph-web