Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #10828

Re: sphinx-build vs. Python 3

Path csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.CARNet.hr!news.spin.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: sphinx-build vs. Python 3
Date Tue, 21 Aug 2018 13:00:02 +0200
Message-ID <wpcye-1Aw-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <woNq9-3Oq-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <woPLj-53M-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <wpawp-s7-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <wpceR-1uj-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Aug 21 10:57:10 2018
Old-Return-Path <ondrej.novy@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-1.748 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, EMPTY_BODY=3, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .gmail. - helo: .mail-ua1-x934.google. - helo-domain: .google.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -7
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ondrej-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=m37YGWwixR/KNl3kUHsQ69WuHeK3BRfTnU2irRVQ5jM=; b=zUKZ7DRhKsPsLrOHQs5uI13EPoZ9Nblstc0TiLSNfKp3/vWTZlHVQebhMwdRTWdjSG wygj+v2c05GrQARdQ56Va6uazyJn+H6QlbAK7xjPulaG2R3iY650TpZ5MWWmvnUnNMiB 0dDB7aNz0t40MSJeQLQniV87Dpo1WfC2UblI+S5/Ay0OcxwUF3PwFsnvg+L1EAhXiPtl FaLPBPWtxn+y79achSNxhT5MyRN5PBv9kBrmmfrpaJ+KETJzm7WxqkuvSRGcQvgyq7Mp MLCcsjP4YWgjIzuf2rnDP4SK3Lc6MJ+AXpO+hVXl9LstdpcPpHwTKYj/EWivkB3Zz2CC pbkQ==
X-Google-Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=m37YGWwixR/KNl3kUHsQ69WuHeK3BRfTnU2irRVQ5jM=; b=tJOp+U0AdX2fc4kZ54/F9iX0XJzqL1CR4epF9V9FQfgLd6aLT173m8Mq0qDrIyhnts eZCB21WndqnQKu6zFcC4bPkkMRxOcnYsPgdVhA+AMj1JlChXHvjNPH3UZSpt0eSeXgxc iYW8Iyiu4d7xFxWHpv/K8MGEjABzAP/DnTTnZsbTg9DqmA2XLB4b50y4INsug2v299Wq 3WyYmK9A5K4w78m9S5WkiV360puir6+gMcpiTdNmAZBO+Vsxl4jBUB2UBwyy2RoiN9K1 6Xz870YKryFuosktKcWxxN79hRKcWdX7aGAuQPt3nVE0ppkYzx1CczxBvEc6YgKqD7Y7 6RXw==
X-Gm-Message-State AOUpUlFtvvrNnmtWtXl2eskDN7zeIu+kqQjCbX/o2Ahw3NYnzIe+Bihl FbNR0+fcjOmmULZmmiDFvPBeNlM87GUx9cS1t7s=
X-Google-SMTP-Source AA+uWPxPmEPkRaG5CNIXUeH5EsFX6d7lmNrgLdG1oTegRuiKN8zK92WV0YebVSWLpiOMmpQC6/7LkB7YHbeQcNfWlLE=
X-Received by 2002:ab0:10cc:: with SMTP id x12-v6mr32802957uab.55.1534847998527; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 03:39:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bc8e690573efa57c"
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/16248
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CAOO6c=yw-FVcNCF3KTK4AQXBAhxDxnHMRhi+=ruJpdai4JXDPA@mail.gmail.com
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 46
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc debian-python <debian-python@lists.debian.org>
X-Original-Date Tue, 21 Aug 2018 12:39:46 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <CAOO6c=yw-FVcNCF3KTK4AQXBAhxDxnHMRhi+=ruJpdai4JXDPA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-References <CAOO6c=x1ct-idZy1S9WJM2wnT-FEeQewfEo8QAApCdX1+o4eXw@mail.gmail.com> <e0989250-c651-57cf-a0bf-d320e0cf1a7b@debian.org> <CAOO6c=zCf4R-1EaSF=XfmnEqKKinEJKF0FPHiMRsR6_s9H0n7w@mail.gmail.com> <1af55d4b-7495-9a49-4efa-ba7ae199811f@debian.org>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:10828

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi,

út 21. 8. 2018 v 12:37 odesílatel Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> napsal:

> On top of this, I generally also do PYTHON=python3, just in case the
> Sphinx doc needs to invoke the interpreter...
>

i don't think this is good idea. If Sphinx doc needs to invoke interpreter,
it should do it in more smart way. Overriding default is not solution, just
fix that docs source code.

-- 
Best regards
 Ondřej Nový

Email: novy@ondrej.org
PGP: 3D98 3C52 EB85 980C 46A5  6090 3573 1255 9D1E 064B

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

sphinx-build vs. Python 3 Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2018-08-20 10:10 +0200
  Re: sphinx-build vs. Python 3 Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2018-08-20 12:40 +0200
    Re: sphinx-build vs. Python 3 Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2018-08-21 10:50 +0200
      Re: sphinx-build vs. Python 3 Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2018-08-21 12:40 +0200
        Re: sphinx-build vs. Python 3 Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2018-08-21 13:00 +0200
  Re: sphinx-build vs. Python 3 Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2018-08-21 15:10 +0200
    Re: sphinx-build vs. Python 3 Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2018-08-21 22:30 +0200

csiph-web