Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #8925

Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On 2016-10-03 11:19:10, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Sebastian Ramacher, 2016-10-03]
> > > > > why? I know ftp-masters change all packages from optional to extra but I
> > > > > probably missed an announcement about the reason...
> [...]
> > Where is the myth that they change priority to extra even coming from?
> 
> all my NEW packages have extra by default even though I set optional.
> 
> See f.e. python-async-timeout
> At least on https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/python-async-timeout.html
> (which also states section=misc instead of python). In the past I also
> received an email after *each* upload about section mismatch.

This is the section and priority of the *source* package (which to my
understanding does not have any meaning at all). The binary packages correctly
have

% apt-cache show python3-async-timeout | egrep "Section|Priority"
Section: python
Priority: optional

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Dominik George <nik@naturalnet.de> - 2016-09-12 15:40 +0200
  Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2016-09-28 00:50 +0200
    [WAS: Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package] md , rst, txt,  html, ... Jerome BENOIT <sphericaltriangle@rezozer.net> - 2016-09-28 01:30 +0200
      Re: [WAS: Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package] md , rst,  txt, html, ... Guido van Steen <vansteen@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-28 08:30 +0200
    Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-09-28 11:40 +0200
      Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Bernd Zeimetz <bernd@bzed.de> - 2016-10-02 23:30 +0200
        Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-10-03 10:20 +0200
          Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2016-10-03 10:30 +0200
            Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-10-03 11:20 +0200
              Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2016-10-03 11:30 +0200
          Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Bernd Zeimetz <bernd@bzed.de> - 2016-10-22 21:50 +0200
    Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2016-09-28 14:30 +0200
      Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-09-28 14:40 +0200

csiph-web