Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #8954
| From | Bernd Zeimetz <bernd@bzed.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package |
| Date | 2016-10-22 21:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <svasN-7Fv-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sgzCO-3Ue-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <sm9mh-6ZA-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <smjvk-4WB-53@gated-at.bofh.it> <snWuB-3G8-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <so6DD-22l-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 10/03/2016 10:12 AM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: >>>> * Please set "Priority: extra" and not optional. >>> >>> why? I know ftp-masters change all packages from optional to extra but I >>> probably missed an announcement about the reason... >> >> >> Because of >> https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-priorities >> maybe? :) > > I don't see anything new here. I always used optional unless one of > dependencies was already non-optional. If libraries get Priority=extra > by default, where do f.e. -doc packages go now? They also go to extra. optional: "This is all the software that you might reasonably want to install if you didn't know what it was ....." ... so you think people who don't know what osmalchemy is need to install it? -- Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.de http://www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Dominik George <nik@naturalnet.de> - 2016-09-12 15:40 +0200
Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2016-09-28 00:50 +0200
[WAS: Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package] md , rst, txt, html, ... Jerome BENOIT <sphericaltriangle@rezozer.net> - 2016-09-28 01:30 +0200
Re: [WAS: Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package] md , rst, txt, html, ... Guido van Steen <vansteen@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-28 08:30 +0200
Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-09-28 11:40 +0200
Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Bernd Zeimetz <bernd@bzed.de> - 2016-10-02 23:30 +0200
Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-10-03 10:20 +0200
Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2016-10-03 10:30 +0200
Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-10-03 11:20 +0200
Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2016-10-03 11:30 +0200
Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Bernd Zeimetz <bernd@bzed.de> - 2016-10-22 21:50 +0200
Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2016-09-28 14:30 +0200
Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-09-28 14:40 +0200
csiph-web