Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #8922

Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package

From Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package
Date 2016-10-03 10:20 +0200
Message-ID <so6DD-22l-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sgzCO-3Ue-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <sm9mh-6ZA-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <smjvk-4WB-53@gated-at.bofh.it> <snWuB-3G8-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

> >> * Please set "Priority: extra" and not optional.
> > 
> > why? I know ftp-masters change all packages from optional to extra but I
> > probably missed an announcement about the reason...
> 
> 
> Because of
> https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-priorities
> maybe? :)

I don't see anything new here. I always used optional unless one of
dependencies was already non-optional. If libraries get Priority=extra
by default, where do f.e. -doc packages go now?
-- 
Piotr Ożarowski                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer
www.ozarowski.pl          www.griffith.cc           www.debian.org
GPG Fingerprint: 1D2F A898 58DA AF62 1786 2DF7 AEF6 F1A2 A745 7645

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Dominik George <nik@naturalnet.de> - 2016-09-12 15:40 +0200
  Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2016-09-28 00:50 +0200
    [WAS: Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package] md , rst, txt,  html, ... Jerome BENOIT <sphericaltriangle@rezozer.net> - 2016-09-28 01:30 +0200
      Re: [WAS: Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package] md , rst,  txt, html, ... Guido van Steen <vansteen@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-28 08:30 +0200
    Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-09-28 11:40 +0200
      Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Bernd Zeimetz <bernd@bzed.de> - 2016-10-02 23:30 +0200
        Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-10-03 10:20 +0200
          Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2016-10-03 10:30 +0200
            Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-10-03 11:20 +0200
              Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2016-10-03 11:30 +0200
          Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Bernd Zeimetz <bernd@bzed.de> - 2016-10-22 21:50 +0200
    Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2016-09-28 14:30 +0200
      Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-09-28 14:40 +0200

csiph-web