Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #8923

Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package

Path	csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package
Date	Mon, 03 Oct 2016 10:30:02 +0200
Message-ID	<so6Nk-2be-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<sgzCO-3Ue-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <sm9mh-6ZA-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <smjvk-4WB-53@gated-at.bofh.it> <snWuB-3G8-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <so6DD-22l-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Mon Oct 3 08:27:25 2016
Old-Return-Path	<sebastian@ramacher.at>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-15.098 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.099] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate:hard: -6.1
X-Greylist	delayed 463 seconds by postgrey-1.35 at bendel; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 08:27:13 UTC
Dkim-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ramacher.at; s=mail; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=3q0mVzaDvJeJcoiByZf0RHYNdlx4t6xTr8UbKXJ1AQM=; b=ssO+O8BG8C0sd79kLcXwU4AeLZDXjC5hKnHEfrrV6YdIiCZoMUFAPA/cfEWJeI4rwmBB2FK1gtV3GIOVZWgancrubDuLmQFRDxAqAuUKu7t0PVaPJwzAliHPCaXjAzR5o6fye3R78kIc8l4n3AOghOFjdntuRWDuCF8HXrLDilc=;
Mail-Followup-To	debian-python@lists.debian.org
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ibxza46hkgyznqdo"
Content-Disposition	inline
User-Agent	NeoMutt/20160916 (1.7.0)
X-Mailing-List	<debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/14265
List-ID	<debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20161003081920.frn2xku7hhgwdglp@ramacher.at
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	49
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Mon, 3 Oct 2016 10:19:20 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID	<20161003081920.frn2xku7hhgwdglp@ramacher.at>
X-Original-References	<2097454.ohjlqoN4CH@portux> <d7d5e1ca-56be-4618-eb02-fb61acb70343@debian.org> <20160928093151.w43uwqgfxwjusj2m@sar0.p1otr.com> <9f348c12-9281-5a25-eaec-7afcb9205e80@bzed.de> <20161003081204.yvm74r6m4bh5xhja@sar0.p1otr.com>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:8923

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On 2016-10-03 10:12:04, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> > >> * Please set "Priority: extra" and not optional.
> > > 
> > > why? I know ftp-masters change all packages from optional to extra but I
> > > probably missed an announcement about the reason...
> > 
> > 
> > Because of
> > https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-priorities
> > maybe? :)
> 
> I don't see anything new here. I always used optional unless one of
> dependencies was already non-optional. If libraries get Priority=extra
> by default, where do f.e. -doc packages go now?

Where is the myth that they change priority to extra even coming from?

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Thread

Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Dominik George <nik@naturalnet.de> - 2016-09-12 15:40 +0200
  Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2016-09-28 00:50 +0200
    [WAS: Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package] md , rst, txt,  html, ... Jerome BENOIT <sphericaltriangle@rezozer.net> - 2016-09-28 01:30 +0200
      Re: [WAS: Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package] md , rst,  txt, html, ... Guido van Steen <vansteen@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-28 08:30 +0200
    Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-09-28 11:40 +0200
      Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Bernd Zeimetz <bernd@bzed.de> - 2016-10-02 23:30 +0200
        Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-10-03 10:20 +0200
          Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2016-10-03 10:30 +0200
            Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-10-03 11:20 +0200
              Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2016-10-03 11:30 +0200
          Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Bernd Zeimetz <bernd@bzed.de> - 2016-10-22 21:50 +0200
    Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2016-09-28 14:30 +0200
      Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-09-28 14:40 +0200

csiph-web