Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #8909
| Path | csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Guido van Steen <vansteen@users.sourceforge.net> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: [WAS: Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package] md , rst, txt, html, ... |
| Date | Wed, 28 Sep 2016 08:30:02 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <smgxs-3cB-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sgzCO-3Ue-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <sm9mh-6ZA-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <sm9Z0-7rG-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | sphericaltriangle@rezozer.net |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Wed Sep 28 06:26:29 2016 |
| Old-Return-Path | <guido.vansteen@gmail.com> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-5.697 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -7 |
| Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=k9xQ2pFntWnQgqfX26zFocSgUA3tBTchEJHbUoLZKps=; b=w7i2iutsbtFs3dfj/68JMJdDYrnGyR3QlWQ7G2kodY/eDhSkH/IGoKDBpsiAL8IE4C AqF53m8UVt4ZOLbVBqpBqhghvK9EsuLx1rN0zRh6gKpoeU/JSqEsQyKWANUwC2g0GC30 4glennXlkCoSZA2CVFu/XpQQgeDx2UTEhdORxpokliPrJ6Ny+Cr9g+nwoE13/OujFhT3 gPdPryM7vt3/dVKd2JIlIkZo0J8ZkcKWPtaWP5pcWRdYfWuLkGF9pbTinmExfX6MQiXa 98HTs2MyaH/pZPXg4dMbRjYPtVJtWV7p0WjTojNT0SkonKutRJq81/EGzHxLFn3IV5Q2 u9UA== |
| X-Google-Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=k9xQ2pFntWnQgqfX26zFocSgUA3tBTchEJHbUoLZKps=; b=FM+DHlNP6RUOHWLwapeQ143MYFMwetVD69NOWpfxafP1GCIhkxm7iYobEU4T5z9ENg kkgBheFEKASKgb8IzDT/8A152pZpyNMWiEUJQVbTda83cTpwwuxS6Gilxy0dkhXTE8S3 jh4ivdtIcZyn6s8LTvpGF90eQmEwfTxqQ3okO7C4AI/MZamtVQbqmVuqjeNDXiqbpL0P Q4ZGs39dr0UA53z+Mrl40gcxLwykyGmn5VSsUPAwpMmwYgad6J680xvqQz/1hHREGEXy EXhILmyK3KolbkeKXCZvrpgjnA+3nl8ta6UnwKBrNx9femOzKFc2xTTYsl9Z+gDXH7mP ibNA== |
| X-Gm-Message-State | AA6/9RnY8jvSqE4WWKab563UldP5oasjjp2nF1YvzXAXp25Hf3Zbd1wvEMshla+B+0/nCBxohgdDhxVrz/5zHw== |
| X-Received | by 10.200.37.111 with SMTP id 44mr32419276qtn.17.1475043969490; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 23:26:09 -0700 (PDT) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Google-Sender-Auth | 5LZKI7BXJNofYT-l_4vBsRlP07E |
| Content-Type | multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11404e94d465f8053d8b6fd1 |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/14251 |
| List-ID | <debian-python.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CAMtVZ+tweNASm1gk4_Q0B1PvvBHghqy_O7_YYwvBmdRBhPOe2g@mail.gmail.com |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 42 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| X-Original-Cc | debian-python@lists.debian.org |
| X-Original-Date | Wed, 28 Sep 2016 08:26:09 +0200 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <CAMtVZ+tweNASm1gk4_Q0B1PvvBHghqy_O7_YYwvBmdRBhPOe2g@mail.gmail.com> |
| X-Original-References | <2097454.ohjlqoN4CH@portux> <d7d5e1ca-56be-4618-eb02-fb61acb70343@debian.org> <04ad5957-1926-1301-6b6c-bf5ea855b334@rezozer.net> |
| X-Original-Sender | guido.vansteen@gmail.com |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:8909 |
Show key headers only | View raw
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi Jerome, I may not fully understand the issue, but why not keep *.md, *.rst, *.pod, etc. the way they are? The main advantage of *.md, *.rst, *.pod, etc. is their readability. Their additional advantage is that they can easily be transferred into *.html or many other formats, if desired. A missing man page might make such a conversion necessary. In that case a *.md, *.rst, *.pod, or a .whatever file could be converted into *.*roff, which should be done during build process. Standard conversion of *.md, *.rst, *.pod, etc. to *.txt is IMO a plain bad idea, because *.md, *.rst, *.pod files are meant to be readable text files anyway. Best wishes, Guido van Steen
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Dominik George <nik@naturalnet.de> - 2016-09-12 15:40 +0200
Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2016-09-28 00:50 +0200
[WAS: Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package] md , rst, txt, html, ... Jerome BENOIT <sphericaltriangle@rezozer.net> - 2016-09-28 01:30 +0200
Re: [WAS: Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package] md , rst, txt, html, ... Guido van Steen <vansteen@users.sourceforge.net> - 2016-09-28 08:30 +0200
Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-09-28 11:40 +0200
Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Bernd Zeimetz <bernd@bzed.de> - 2016-10-02 23:30 +0200
Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-10-03 10:20 +0200
Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2016-10-03 10:30 +0200
Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-10-03 11:20 +0200
Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2016-10-03 11:30 +0200
Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Bernd Zeimetz <bernd@bzed.de> - 2016-10-22 21:50 +0200
Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2016-09-28 14:30 +0200
Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-09-28 14:40 +0200
csiph-web