Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #8790

Re: on keep providing python 2 packages

Path csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!news.panservice.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: on keep providing python 2 packages
Date Fri, 19 Aug 2016 11:50:02 +0200
Message-ID <s7OB4-3UZ-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <s7MpB-2B9-71@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Aug 19 09:41:30 2016
Old-Return-Path <julien@cristau.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-7.547 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition inline
X-Operating-System Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 x86_64
User-Agent Mutt/1.6.2-neo (2016-07-23)
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/14131
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20160819094113.pu55wrffw3tteq3j@betterave.cristau.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 23
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc debian-python <debian-python@lists.debian.org>
X-Original-Date Fri, 19 Aug 2016 11:41:13 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <20160819094113.pu55wrffw3tteq3j@betterave.cristau.org>
X-Original-References <CAB4XWXz5oDCwHKVzR3EcETUwA3383Bamnj4u98DEQ97VaBz1-w@mail.gmail.com>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:8790

Show key headers only | View raw


On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 08:19:46 +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:

> I got a feeling we are somehow discouraging the introduction of
> python2 package in unstable (it was also discussed at the BoF).
> 
> while i can see why we dont want to introduce new python2-only
> package, i feel that just providing a py3k pkg while the module is
> also py2 compatible is a disservice to our users: wether we like it or
> not, python 2 is the de facto interpreter for python and not having a
> module available will not just make everyone switch to py3k (i already
> faced it a couple of times already, where i needed a module to extend
> an already existing project, and it was not there)
> 
> does anyone else agrees with this view? should we clarify that, when
> available, python2 modules must be provided (along with their py3k)?
> 
> apps/scripts are fine being py3k by default, but the underlying
> modules has to be provided by for py2 if compatible.
> 
Very much agree.

Cheers,
Julien

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

on keep providing python 2 packages Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-08-19 09:30 +0200
  Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Olivier Sallou <olivier.sallou@irisa.fr> - 2016-08-19 09:50 +0200
  Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2016-08-19 10:10 +0200
  Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org> - 2016-08-19 11:50 +0200
  Re: on keep providing python 2 packages "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2016-08-19 12:20 +0200
  Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2016-08-19 12:50 +0200
    Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-08-19 13:00 +0200
      Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2016-08-19 19:30 +0200
        Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-08-20 18:50 +0200
          Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2016-08-20 21:10 +0200
            Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-08-20 22:30 +0200
              Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com> - 2016-08-21 00:40 +0200
              Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-08-21 00:40 +0200
                Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2016-08-21 09:50 +0200
                Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-21 22:20 +0200
    Re: on keep providing python 2 packages "Elena ``of Valhalla''" <elena.valhalla@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 13:40 +0200
  Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-19 15:30 +0200

csiph-web