Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14166

Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package

Path	csiph.com!pasdenom.info!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package
Date	Wed, 08 Jun 2022 15:30:01 +0200
Message-ID	<Ew3UZ-3rFU-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<EvuXf-34C0-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <EvuXf-34C0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Evw2Z-35cy-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Evx8J-35Wo-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Evxs5-3638-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <EvAJk-38p1-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <EvHKN-3cT1-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <EvIGR-3dDp-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <EvIQx-3dGO-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <EvIQx-3dGO-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <EvQbn-3ihk-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Wed Jun 8 13:20:50 2022
Old-Return-Path	<anarcat@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-108.001 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.801, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate: -3.5
Organization	Debian
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain
X-Mailing-List	<debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/19994
List-ID	<debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/87tu8vp9zy.fsf@curie.anarc.at
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	14
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc	debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date	Wed, 08 Jun 2022 09:20:33 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID	<87tu8vp9zy.fsf@curie.anarc.at>
X-Original-References	<87sfohoni3.fsf@curie.anarc.at> <fe867c28-62cc-f02b-0f71-6e4990ed8ac4@gmail.com> <0f84e96b-c0eb-2d0e-fc7e-a8b272549aea@gmail.com> <87fskhb44h.fsf@angela.anarc.at> <367c1fcc-e57e-bde4-61eb-787042586a60@gmail.com> <Yp7sA2fh2MruNE9C@d-and-j.net> <87pmjkzitm.fsf@curie.anarc.at> <Yp9kTN3n7P3sCqRA@d-and-j.net> <87v8tcy1b7.fsf@curie.anarc.at> <Yp9m7diwA2deFWkQ@d-and-j.net> <619e6feb-4d3c-ca59-c35e-6f75176111a2@gmail.com>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14166

Show key headers only | View raw

On 2022-06-07 18:46:37, Ben Westover wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've read more into versioneer, and it turns out with the way it works 
> you can't simply remove versioneer.py from the source, much less 
> _version.py. Therefore, I'm excluding _version.py in d/copyright, then 
> replacing it with the much smaller PyPI version in d/patches, and not 
> touching versioneer.py at all, since with the way versioneer works it's 
> technically not vendoring.

Got it, thanks for bearing with me here.
-- 
The destiny of Earthseed is to take root among the stars.
                        - Octavia Butler

Thread

Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 02:10 +0200
  Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 03:20 +0200
    Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 04:30 +0200
      Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 04:50 +0200
        Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 08:20 +0200
        Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 08:20 +0200
          Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 15:50 +0200
            Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 16:50 +0200
              Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 17:00 +0200
                Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 00:50 +0200
                Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-08 15:30 +0200
              Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 17:00 +0200
        Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 15:50 +0200
          Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 17:00 +0200
            Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 17:10 +0200
        Versioneer [was Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package] Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 16:30 +0200
          Re: Versioneer [was Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package] Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2022-06-08 03:30 +0200

csiph-web