Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14159

Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package

Path csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package
Date Wed, 08 Jun 2022 00:50:01 +0200
Message-ID <EvQbn-3ihk-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <EvuXf-34C0-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <EvuXf-34C0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Evw2Z-35cy-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Evx8J-35Wo-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Evxs5-3638-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <EvAJk-38p1-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <EvHKN-3cT1-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <EvIGR-3dDp-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <EvIQx-3dGO-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <EvIQx-3dGO-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net>, Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Jun 7 22:46:56 2022
Old-Return-Path <kwestover.kw@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-14.381 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, NICE_REPLY_A=-2.192, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate:hard: -5.5
X-Gm-Message-State AOAM533PoHCeFx73CJ6FxO5hz+deme5L8fWa96jekhpVwrkMhLQE5jU4 H+3+svglY6ypy2P9JAMecEA=
X-Google-SMTP-Source ABdhPJypWcwyhUijXkWJVIzyOgDLqiHNY9zWfOlNgJC2Dm4qz37xEVN7X3GqmyR2oZB0BKaWlIxtYg==
X-Received by 2002:a05:620a:f0d:b0:67e:1c14:bc5e with SMTP id v13-20020a05620a0f0d00b0067e1c14bc5emr21328539qkl.502.1654641999905; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 15:46:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version 1.0
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1
Content-Language en-US
Content-Type multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------0lt9S4i59DRiMVd4qo0FBorM"
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/19987
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/619e6feb-4d3c-ca59-c35e-6f75176111a2@gmail.com
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 57
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date Tue, 7 Jun 2022 18:46:37 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID <619e6feb-4d3c-ca59-c35e-6f75176111a2@gmail.com>
X-Original-References <87sfohoni3.fsf@curie.anarc.at> <fe867c28-62cc-f02b-0f71-6e4990ed8ac4@gmail.com> <0f84e96b-c0eb-2d0e-fc7e-a8b272549aea@gmail.com> <87fskhb44h.fsf@angela.anarc.at> <367c1fcc-e57e-bde4-61eb-787042586a60@gmail.com> <Yp7sA2fh2MruNE9C@d-and-j.net> <87pmjkzitm.fsf@curie.anarc.at> <Yp9kTN3n7P3sCqRA@d-and-j.net> <87v8tcy1b7.fsf@curie.anarc.at> <Yp9m7diwA2deFWkQ@d-and-j.net>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14159

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hello,

I've read more into versioneer, and it turns out with the way it works 
you can't simply remove versioneer.py from the source, much less 
_version.py. Therefore, I'm excluding _version.py in d/copyright, then 
replacing it with the much smaller PyPI version in d/patches, and not 
touching versioneer.py at all, since with the way versioneer works it's 
technically not vendoring.

Thanks,
--
Ben Westover

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 02:10 +0200
  Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 03:20 +0200
    Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 04:30 +0200
      Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 04:50 +0200
        Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 08:20 +0200
        Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 08:20 +0200
          Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 15:50 +0200
            Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 16:50 +0200
              Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 17:00 +0200
                Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 00:50 +0200
                Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-08 15:30 +0200
              Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 17:00 +0200
        Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 15:50 +0200
          Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 17:00 +0200
            Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 17:10 +0200
        Versioneer [was Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package] Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 16:30 +0200
          Re: Versioneer [was Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package] Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2022-06-08 03:30 +0200

csiph-web