Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14157

Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package
Date Tue, 07 Jun 2022 17:10:01 +0200
Message-ID <EvJ0d-3dZZ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <EvuXf-34C0-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <EvuXf-34C0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Evw2Z-35cy-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Evx8J-35Wo-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Evxs5-3638-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <EvHKN-3cT1-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <EvIQx-3dGO-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Jun 7 15:01:13 2022
Old-Return-Path <julian@d-and-j.net>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-7.19 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate:hard: -4.6
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition inline
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/19985
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/Yp9oJRlnZT2VFtd6@d-and-j.net
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 21
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com>, debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date Tue, 7 Jun 2022 16:00:53 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID <Yp9oJRlnZT2VFtd6@d-and-j.net>
X-Original-References <87sfohoni3.fsf@curie.anarc.at> <fe867c28-62cc-f02b-0f71-6e4990ed8ac4@gmail.com> <0f84e96b-c0eb-2d0e-fc7e-a8b272549aea@gmail.com> <87fskhb44h.fsf@angela.anarc.at> <367c1fcc-e57e-bde4-61eb-787042586a60@gmail.com> <87sfogziu5.fsf@curie.anarc.at> <Yp9nylOxkzbkdGJL@d-and-j.net>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14157

Show key headers only | View raw


On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 03:59:22PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > As far as I understand it, this file is used by the author of the 
> > > program, not end users. I don't understand it well, though, because I 
> > > haven't put much time into researching what versioneer even does.
> > > If my hunch is correct, I may be able to just remove the file from the 
> > > source altogether, but I haven't tried that yet.
> > 
> > Well, it's used by the program to show the version info, so it's
> > *eventually* used by users for sure.
> > 
> > I think just removing the file is a good first guess.
> 
> Removing the file is a bad idea!  Replacing it with the PyPI version
> (through debian/patches) is a much better approach.  (And possibly
> excluding the file in debian/copyright as well.)

Ah, scrap my comment - listen to Timo instead!

Best wishes,

   Julian

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 02:10 +0200
  Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 03:20 +0200
    Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 04:30 +0200
      Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 04:50 +0200
        Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 08:20 +0200
        Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 08:20 +0200
          Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 15:50 +0200
            Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 16:50 +0200
              Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 17:00 +0200
                Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Ben Westover <kwestover.kw@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 00:50 +0200
                Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-08 15:30 +0200
              Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 17:00 +0200
        Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 15:50 +0200
          Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 17:00 +0200
            Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-06-07 17:10 +0200
        Versioneer [was Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package] Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org> - 2022-06-07 16:30 +0200
          Re: Versioneer [was Re: a review of your bumblebee-status package] Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2022-06-08 03:30 +0200

csiph-web