Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #13738

Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3 - to unstable now or not?

Path	csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed7.news.xs4all.nl!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	"Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3 - to unstable now or not?
Date	Sun, 28 Nov 2021 20:20:02 +0100
Message-ID	<DoxSq-7RP-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<Di1sd-7oM-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <Di1sd-7oM-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Di1sd-7oM-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <DlOG6-7Ii-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <DlSTn-1Si-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <DlXq1-4iS-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <DmpPk-4DD-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <DnPRn-6Hv-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Di1sd-7oM-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <DnPRn-6Hv-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org Sun Nov 28 19:15:09 2021
Old-Return-Path	<debbugs@buxtehude.debian.org>
X-Spam-Flag	NO
X-Spam-Score	-3.5
Reply-To	"Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com>, 999415@bugs.debian.org
Resent-To	debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-Cc	Debian Science Team <debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
X-Debian-Pr-Message	followup 999415
X-Debian-Pr-Package	src:pandas
X-Debian-Pr-Source	pandas
Arc-Seal	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1638126749; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=DM39pi4LCGQNA4A2f0F+4Id7464TkH1S7r6VUnfgYCdJCR18LWs0vLm9+DxKoOOHlYhSh/LizM55Dnf7t7mU0aJHNNGnnmBm7rA1vK4BhdJQDT0xzvzMiDzDBmX1uObwsdKqVbxieYEBAbzJdmUfwrilumkBSXAlqUm6iXNPVp8=
Arc-Message-Signature	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1638126749; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=u+XH+u5R0gSbA4L/GO7EdAJG5J9f5PFZmgv1N8i1g+c=; b=cAAihHSmdD+aqFknttFNJ7/L+7N9k57frqO9ANA+sGoMwh6z4DhwXEg7fnApHgO/kRgQZMALzHhgikwpMO1sV/K175wRFQRusiG+sDH3tCyWt7HCxl7U4tjXjjKYB6pgCAq7+JOS8NM+9MkC5HCe+DkDMeS90Z4StrsQROVKJhE=
Arc-Authentication-Results	i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=zoho.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rebecca_palmer@zoho.com; dmarc=pass header.from=<rebecca_palmer@zoho.com>
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language	en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Zohomailclient	External
X-Debian-Message	from BTS
X-Mailing-List	<debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/1693074
List-ID	<debian-bugs-dist.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-bugs-dist/>
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	10
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Sun, 28 Nov 2021 19:12:18 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID	<de0c5d4b-8be1-6e77-2e04-e3cd8a49fed6@zoho.com>
X-Original-References	<YYv921oVEMm+s0Qm@an3as.eu> <c06879b7-a7a4-61e2-d229-3675f166c9ed@zoho.com> <c06879b7-a7a4-61e2-d229-3675f166c9ed@zoho.com> <CAM8zJQtxWuL1BGrH5xsJPysdhJRt4qNFxQiOQ0a3xW54enNSgg@mail.gmail.com> <d8316dd8-85ac-53f1-fccc-df21a442bbb8@zoho.com> <61874db3-3f9d-cdc6-8acc-821d148d12a6@zoho.com> <1f952bf8-8eb9-e810-5ac9-bd9ba891a170@zoho.com> <5f975766-b826-c686-9a77-88ddbb20a5cd@zoho.com> <c06879b7-a7a4-61e2-d229-3675f166c9ed@zoho.com> <5f975766-b826-c686-9a77-88ddbb20a5cd@zoho.com>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:1083398 linux.debian.maint.python:13738

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

After build-testing about half of the reverse dependencies, failures 
that look new-pandas-related are cfgrib #1000726, joypy #1000727, 
python-skbio #1000752, and maybe hyperspy (not filed yet).

python-skbio and hyperspy already FTBFS for unrelated reasons (but fail 
more tests with new pandas), and joypy looks trivially fixable.

Given this and expecting to find a similar number in the other half, 
against pandas 1.3 working on python3.10 while 1.1 doesn't (#1000422), 
would you prefer to have pandas 1.3 in unstable now, or not?

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3 - to unstable now or not? "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2021-11-28 20:20 +0100
  Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3 - to unstable now or not? Scott Talbert <swt@techie.net> - 2021-11-28 23:10 +0100

csiph-web