Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #13738

Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3 - to unstable now or not?

From	"Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3 - to unstable now or not?
Date	2021-11-28 20:20 +0100
Message-ID	<DoxSq-7RP-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <DlXq1-4iS-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <DmpPk-4DD-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <DnPRn-6Hv-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Di1sd-7oM-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <DnPRn-6Hv-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

After build-testing about half of the reverse dependencies, failures 
that look new-pandas-related are cfgrib #1000726, joypy #1000727, 
python-skbio #1000752, and maybe hyperspy (not filed yet).

python-skbio and hyperspy already FTBFS for unrelated reasons (but fail 
more tests with new pandas), and joypy looks trivially fixable.

Given this and expecting to find a similar number in the other half, 
against pandas 1.3 working on python3.10 while 1.1 doesn't (#1000422), 
would you prefer to have pandas 1.3 in unstable now, or not?

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3 - to unstable now or not? "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2021-11-28 20:20 +0100
  Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3 - to unstable now or not? Scott Talbert <swt@techie.net> - 2021-11-28 23:10 +0100

csiph-web