Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1083201

Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3

From "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist
Subject Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3
Date 2021-11-26 21:20 +0100
Message-ID <DnPRn-6Hv-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <DlSTn-1Si-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <DlXq1-4iS-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <DmpPk-4DD-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <Di1sd-7oM-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <DmpPk-4DD-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


The pandas package currently in Salsa should fix the test failures on 
all release architectures (except mips* which haven't attempted a build 
yet), but hasn't yet been tested (anywhere).  It's still missing one 
page of the documentation, but I'm willing to accept that for now to 
unblock Python 3.10.

I mostly wasted my first rdeps testing run by accidentally using 
stable's source packages (causing most of them to fail).  I have started 
another run.

Of the autopkgtest failures in 
https://release.debian.org/britney/pseudo-excuses-experimental.html#pandas 
, python-feather-format and python-geotiepoints look like "not built for 
Python 3.10 yet", python-skbio looks like a real bug.

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3 "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2021-11-10 20:30 +0100
  Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3 Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> - 2021-11-21 07:40 +0100
    Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3 "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2021-11-21 12:10 +0100
      Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3 "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2021-11-21 17:00 +0100
        Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3 "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2021-11-22 23:20 +0100
          Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3 "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2021-11-26 21:20 +0100
            Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3 - to unstable now or not? "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2021-11-28 20:20 +0100
              Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3 - to unstable now or not? Scott Talbert <swt@techie.net> - 2021-11-28 23:10 +0100
              Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3 "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2021-11-29 22:00 +0100
                Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3 "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2021-12-09 23:00 +0100

csiph-web