Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #12691

Re: Maintaining all of the testing-cabal packages under the OpenStack team

Path csiph.com!4.us.feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: Maintaining all of the testing-cabal packages under the OpenStack team
Date Mon, 29 Jun 2020 13:00:01 +0200
Message-ID <AmZG1-3Ec-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <AmJrA-2fD-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <AmVVL-1mk-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <AmZG1-3Ec-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Mon Jun 29 10:58:55 2020
Old-Return-Path <debian@kitterman.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-7.2 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -5.5
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903e; t=1593428319; h=date : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : subject : to : from : message-id : from; bh=lQ0Ia4Nl7lzSUNtvQ8mrU7q5Z0LoO0UKjVGe5TatwU0=; b=vyQ6qJK7ickmOtViWrSYTQJGNjlmQahK+7MYpQbIhWHxzm1caWc4I9ys4BG5nXzBoIzzJ 28RWaaLWCe921/RDw==
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903r; t=1593428319; h=date : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : subject : to : from : message-id : from; bh=lQ0Ia4Nl7lzSUNtvQ8mrU7q5Z0LoO0UKjVGe5TatwU0=; b=UzjWZMD7+UTNPrYJsVQOmS0urOvJYGtvCf0CHgVXo5e1bpWiXXKiYywAmYwz53IQ7OnBU q5s8qHJTfzCOL0+i+SwhjUJrgQ+0be2+E7OY67YmIwnH87nCmcx+N4vvSYsW8Kr8aqevXX2 vFvWJN+E8XqXoOlBZIt1Z1E/0yAL1eCqZK91ZZ9kq57VOEc5fWohvh/YJiufijxBdslhnSi 5ZqybTFM2wOX8LJ0PsOZaTl+TD12PLV704tCGpPt20G5DuHF56qZaYCBMztjhC5+GuIRFVo bMEgqAdcnYLZBFFqJTnC/XEoXIRIE8Bu6yoJnIuDIU+ib1lTVnro93YlDp8Q==
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/18411
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/C8785EF9-E258-4FD9-9031-BD26D48C3BF5@kitterman.com
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 34
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:58:36 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID <C8785EF9-E258-4FD9-9031-BD26D48C3BF5@kitterman.com>
X-Original-References <10f32e46-e9e5-acbe-739f-fe563da025e3@debian.org> <CAOO6c=zpH3iirXjfmkKVTPWmAcMkQCvz+8uBkuSq31_hDZ-XBw@mail.gmail.com> <e7e12d85-e550-6e2c-1d32-3936787052c0@debian.org>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:12691

Show key headers only | View raw



On June 29, 2020 10:12:49 AM UTC, Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> wrote:
>On 6/29/20 8:34 AM, Ondrej Novy wrote:
...
>>     More over, mock debhelper was upgraded to 13, for no apparent
>reason
>>     (yet another "cosmetic fix" that isn't helping?). I'd like to
>remind
>>     everyone that, increasing debhelper compat version to a number
>that
>>     isn't in stable, without a specific reason (like the need of a
>specific
>>     feature that wasn't there before) is just annoying for anyone
>>     maintaining backports. That's truth even for when debhelper
>itself is
>>     backported to oldstable (it's always nicer to be able to build a
>>     backport without requiring another backport at build time).
>> 
>> nope, this is not true. Using the newest debhelper compat level is
>> recommended, see man page. There is no reason to __not__ upgrade
>> debhelper compat level. I will always upgrade debhelper in my
>packages
>> to the newest debhelper as soon as possible. Please newer downgrade
>> debhelper in my packages again without asking.
>
>I don't agree this is best practice when backports are to be expected.

I'm substantially less enthusiastic about bumping compat levels than Ondrej, but since debhelper 13 is available in buster-backports, backporting is unrelated to whether it's a good idea or not.

Scott K

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Maintaining all of the testing-cabal packages under the OpenStack team Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2020-06-29 09:00 +0200
  Re: Maintaining all of the testing-cabal packages under the OpenStack team Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2020-06-29 13:00 +0200
    Re: Maintaining all of the testing-cabal packages under the OpenStack  team Scott Talbert <swt@techie.net> - 2020-06-29 16:20 +0200
      Re: Maintaining all of the testing-cabal packages under the OpenStack team Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2020-06-29 16:40 +0200
        Re: Maintaining all of the testing-cabal packages under the OpenStack  team Jean-Philippe MENGUAL <jpmengual@debian.org> - 2020-08-12 19:00 +0200
    Re: Maintaining all of the testing-cabal packages under the OpenStack team Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2020-06-29 16:50 +0200
  Re: pybuild vs os-pkg-tools [was: Maintaining all of the  testing-cabal packages under the OpenStack team] Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2020-07-07 08:40 +0200
    Re: pybuild vs os-pkg-tools [was: Maintaining all of the  testing-cabal packages under the OpenStack team] Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2020-07-08 13:10 +0200

csiph-web