Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #12695

Re: Maintaining all of the testing-cabal packages under the OpenStack team

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon, 29 Jun 2020, Scott Kitterman wrote:

>>>     More over, mock debhelper was upgraded to 13, for no apparent
>> reason
>>>     (yet another "cosmetic fix" that isn't helping?). I'd like to
>> remind
>>>     everyone that, increasing debhelper compat version to a number
>> that
>>>     isn't in stable, without a specific reason (like the need of a
>> specific
>>>     feature that wasn't there before) is just annoying for anyone
>>>     maintaining backports. That's truth even for when debhelper
>> itself is
>>>     backported to oldstable (it's always nicer to be able to build a
>>>     backport without requiring another backport at build time).
>>>
>>> nope, this is not true. Using the newest debhelper compat level is
>>> recommended, see man page. There is no reason to __not__ upgrade
>>> debhelper compat level. I will always upgrade debhelper in my
>> packages
>>> to the newest debhelper as soon as possible. Please newer downgrade
>>> debhelper in my packages again without asking.
>>
>> I don't agree this is best practice when backports are to be expected.
>
> I'm substantially less enthusiastic about bumping compat levels than 
> Ondrej, but since debhelper 13 is available in buster-backports, 
> backporting is unrelated to whether it's a good idea or not.

Can you elaborate on other reasons not the upgrade the compat levels?

Scott

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Maintaining all of the testing-cabal packages under the OpenStack team Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2020-06-29 09:00 +0200
  Re: Maintaining all of the testing-cabal packages under the OpenStack team Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2020-06-29 13:00 +0200
    Re: Maintaining all of the testing-cabal packages under the OpenStack  team Scott Talbert <swt@techie.net> - 2020-06-29 16:20 +0200
      Re: Maintaining all of the testing-cabal packages under the OpenStack team Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2020-06-29 16:40 +0200
        Re: Maintaining all of the testing-cabal packages under the OpenStack  team Jean-Philippe MENGUAL <jpmengual@debian.org> - 2020-08-12 19:00 +0200
    Re: Maintaining all of the testing-cabal packages under the OpenStack team Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2020-06-29 16:50 +0200
  Re: pybuild vs os-pkg-tools [was: Maintaining all of the  testing-cabal packages under the OpenStack team] Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2020-07-07 08:40 +0200
    Re: pybuild vs os-pkg-tools [was: Maintaining all of the  testing-cabal packages under the OpenStack team] Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2020-07-08 13:10 +0200

csiph-web