Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #60593

Re: armel/marvell kernel size

Path csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.ports.arm, linux.debian.kernel
Subject Re: armel/marvell kernel size
Date Wed, 28 Mar 2018 11:30:01 +0200
Message-ID <vyfz3-1gO-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <uCG9P-4Kh-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <v99ZT-mH-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <vaKNH-5y0-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <vbbEf-5Ms-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <vka6d-72h-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <vw6Tg-80p-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <vwGDo-6Sy-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <vwGDo-6Sy-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <vxPEC-7UM-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <vxW3o-3UW-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <vy3od-VQ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <vy3Hz-15Z-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <vy4ki-1A9-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-arm-request@lists.debian.org Wed Mar 28 09:23:13 2018
Old-Return-Path <rbthomas@pobox.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-7.11 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -8.1
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=subject :mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=sasl; bh= Mlm3m7Wtem1ruHW61NdEQL5ZMjY=; b=GgNR1iOterEtSbAL+QIE38Pjcfo8qUPb Dc1t3C2/Dpp80LWHDhEWr/ekqCJ5kj2LOUGU/Icu41MOoKmES4LTQ8fZ5SYyblS8 JVEgrKvHmfpFYekJNEt1AqJua03hCZc+KIbR04ySGtX7MvCObp2STs6t+nvSHgOv Z33vRfIkAds=
Domainkey-Signature a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=subject :mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s= sasl; b=GWQNGobVSbIhTSEtYOP1galsSbxVTMdYZYB+//Thn+ruem1j+pXqJXkL p2k13jBBWHq+o3D69Y/GBA0/1C8DIFvOi0Ce3X1ATFqCescnZOK9gKRyAaRl2EvR Q57ZXvk22BSU8lAEHrtxMdQVuC8ekIexn/1OleaX1J5n+oB1aVM=
MIME-Version 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
X-Mailer Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-Pobox-Relay-ID 8F898ED2-3269-11E8-A9B3-B479894C8D7C-02150157!pb-sasl2.pobox.com
X-Mailing-List <debian-arm@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/21058
List-ID <debian-arm.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/81FCE08E-1EA1-4D42-806E-40D0090501D9@pobox.com
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 47
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>, Arm List Debian <debian-arm@lists.debian.org>, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date Wed, 28 Mar 2018 02:22:35 -0700
X-Original-Message-ID <81FCE08E-1EA1-4D42-806E-40D0090501D9@pobox.com>
X-Original-References <1508508423.2721.34.camel@decadent.org.uk> <1516249342.5097.25.camel@decadent.org.uk> <CAEQ9gEnGTv+VhBMw4K2dvvcVJQsJWZHkwy_To7hF87_R+oqqwg@mail.gmail.com> <1516732223.5097.105.camel@decadent.org.uk> <20180217124851.GA1056@eldamar.local> <20180322031228.GA14629@ime.usp.br> <20180323211530.GA19598@ime.usp.br> <1521856248.2495.257.camel@decadent.org.uk> <CAOtrxKN1WxkZAWBgD-HfkgD2FzPofSj-2GtfnPaP0benC72fzg@mail.gmail.com> <jwvo9j9r95r.fsf-monnier+gmane.linux.debian.ports.arm@gnu.org> <5c79d8f3-a590-4a5e-aa71-1947657d70aa@ime.usp.br> <46C3CC97-3210-423E-AC36-C865B76005F7@pobox.com> <9334f91d-e66c-2d33-686e-21339c36e65b@ime.usp.br>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.ports.arm:10750 linux.debian.kernel:60593

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


On Mar 27, 2018, at 2:08 PM, Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br> wrote:

> On 2018-03-27 17:29, Rick Thomas wrote:
>> On Mar 27, 2018, at 1:04 PM, Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br> wrote:
>>> As a related subject, I could compile a more stripped down version of
>>> the armel kernel, put it for people to download and ask people to
>>> comment if it works for them, so that we can gauge what people actually
>>> need from such a kernel...
>> 
>> Please do!  I have an OpenRD box and a SheevaPlug that I’ll be happy to test on.
> 
> You're welcome. I don't know much about the OpenRD nor about the
> SheevaPlug, but are they able to run the -marvell kernels? What was the
> last version of the kernel that worked for you?
> 
> What filesystems do you use? Do you use any (para)virtualization? What
> about addon hardware that you have? Any USB dongles? Anything that you
> can think of? Sound?
> 
> Do you use NFS? (I do) What kind of compressed ramdisk do you use? The
> loaded modules that you have with lsmod would be nice to know.

A lot of questions…  I’ll do my best to answer them as best I can sometime this weekend (There are an equally large lot of things on my to-do list this week!  /-: )

In the mean time here’s a start:

OpenRD Client
> rbthomas@client:~$ uname -a
> Linux client 4.9.0-6-marvell #1 Debian 4.9.82-1+deb9u3 (2018-03-02) armv5tel GNU/Linux

SheevaPlug
> rbthomas@sheeva:~$ uname -a
> Linux sheeva 4.9.0-6-marvell #1 Debian 4.9.82-1+deb9u3 (2018-03-02) armv5tel GNU/Linux

Both are running the latest Stretch.

Rick

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: armel/marvell kernel size Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-01-18 05:30 +0100
  Re: armel/marvell kernel size Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com> - 2018-01-22 15:00 +0100
    Re: armel/marvell kernel size Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-01-23 19:40 +0100
      Re: armel/marvell kernel size Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-01-26 19:00 +0100
      Re: armel/marvell kernel size Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2018-02-17 13:50 +0100
        Re: armel/marvell kernel size Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2018-02-17 14:20 +0100
          Re: armel/marvell kernel size Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com> - 2018-03-22 13:00 +0100
        Re: armel/marvell kernel size Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com> - 2018-03-22 13:00 +0100
          Re: armel/marvell kernel size Rogério Brito <rbrito@gmail.com> - 2018-03-22 19:20 +0100
        Re: armel/marvell kernel size Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-03-23 00:10 +0100
        Re: armel/marvell kernel size Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-03-24 03:00 +0100
          Re: armel/marvell kernel size Rogério Brito <rbrito@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 07:50 +0200
            Re: armel/marvell kernel size Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2018-03-27 14:40 +0200
              Re: armel/marvell kernel size Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br> - 2018-03-27 22:30 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com> - 2018-03-27 22:50 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br> - 2018-03-27 23:30 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com> - 2018-03-28 11:30 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Federico Pietro Briata <federico@briata.org> - 2018-03-28 14:30 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com> - 2018-04-01 15:30 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br> - 2018-04-03 08:00 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 16:20 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 17:00 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com> - 2018-04-13 02:10 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com> - 2018-04-15 18:30 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com> - 2018-04-02 01:50 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2018-03-27 23:30 +0200
            Re: armel/marvell kernel size Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-03-27 21:10 +0200
              Re: armel not to be released anymore? (was: armel/marvell kernel  size) Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-03-27 21:30 +0200
              armel not to be released anymore? (was: armel/marvell kernel size) "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2018-03-27 21:40 +0200
                Re: armel not to be released anymore? (was: armel/marvell kernel size) Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2018-03-28 06:40 +0200
              Re: armel/marvell kernel size Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br> - 2018-03-27 22:50 +0200

csiph-web