Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.rc > #282795

Bug#966183: abseil FTBFS on !amd64/ppc64: missing symbols

Path csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Benjamin Barenblat <bbaren@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.rc
Subject Bug#966183: abseil FTBFS on !amd64/ppc64: missing symbols
Date Fri, 24 Jul 2020 15:30:01 +0200
Message-ID <Aw5VT-7Ps-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <Aw4Gu-7ag-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Aw4Gu-7ag-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-bugs-rc-request@lists.debian.org Fri Jul 24 13:27:08 2020
Old-Return-Path <debbugs@buxtehude.debian.org>
X-Spam-Flag NO
X-Spam-Score -0.7
Reply-To Benjamin Barenblat <bbaren@debian.org>, 966183@bugs.debian.org
Resent-To debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
X-Debian-Pr-Message followup 966183
X-Debian-Pr-Package src:abseil
X-Debian-Pr-Keywords ftbfs
X-Debian-Pr-Source abseil
X-Spam-Bayes score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 11; hammy, 127; neutral, 35; spammy, 5. spammytokens:0.936-+--benefits, 0.931-+--today, 0.910-+--trouble, 0.909-+--july, 0.892-+--July hammytokens:0.000-+--soname, 0.000-+--H*r:key-exchange, 0.000-+--H*r:RSA-PSS, 0.000-+--H*r:server-digest, 0.000-+--H*r:SHA256
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
X-Greylist delayed 489 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at buxtehude; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 13:25:34 UTC
X-Debian-Message from BTS
X-Mailing-List <debian-bugs-rc@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/629137
List-ID <debian-bugs-rc.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-bugs-rc/>
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 12
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc 966183@bugs.debian.org
X-Original-Date Fri, 24 Jul 2020 09:17:19 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID <87ft9hkq74.jfx@summerland.benjamin.barenblat.name>
X-Original-References <159559193488.14190.3266350499781797529.reportbug@localhost> <159559193488.14190.3266350499781797529.reportbug@localhost>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.rc:282795

Show key headers only | View raw


On Friday, July 24, 2020, at  2:58 PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> When the soname of the library encodes the exact upstream
> version as abseil does, there are exactly zero benefits
> of using a symbols - every update of abseil will be a
> library transition in any case.

Makes sense. I was hoping to stick with the symbols infrastructure
because it’s what I’m familiar with, but I’m completely convinced at
this point that it’s going to be more trouble than it’s worth. I’ll
reupload today with shlibs instead.

Back to linux.debian.bugs.rc | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#966183: abseil FTBFS on !amd64/ppc64: missing symbols Benjamin Barenblat <bbaren@debian.org> - 2020-07-24 15:30 +0200

csiph-web