Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.rc > #282795 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Benjamin Barenblat <bbaren@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2020-07-24 15:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2020-07-24 15:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.rc
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Bug#966183: abseil FTBFS on !amd64/ppc64: missing symbols Benjamin Barenblat <bbaren@debian.org> - 2020-07-24 15:30 +0200
| From | Benjamin Barenblat <bbaren@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-07-24 15:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#966183: abseil FTBFS on !amd64/ppc64: missing symbols |
| Message-ID | <Aw5VT-7Ps-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Friday, July 24, 2020, at 2:58 PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > When the soname of the library encodes the exact upstream > version as abseil does, there are exactly zero benefits > of using a symbols - every update of abseil will be a > library transition in any case. Makes sense. I was hoping to stick with the symbols infrastructure because it’s what I’m familiar with, but I’m completely convinced at this point that it’s going to be more trouble than it’s worth. I’ll reupload today with shlibs instead.
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.rc
csiph-web