Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.rc > #282795
| From | Benjamin Barenblat <bbaren@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.rc |
| Subject | Bug#966183: abseil FTBFS on !amd64/ppc64: missing symbols |
| Date | 2020-07-24 15:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <Aw5VT-7Ps-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <Aw4Gu-7ag-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Aw4Gu-7ag-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Friday, July 24, 2020, at 2:58 PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > When the soname of the library encodes the exact upstream > version as abseil does, there are exactly zero benefits > of using a symbols - every update of abseil will be a > library transition in any case. Makes sense. I was hoping to stick with the symbols infrastructure because it’s what I’m familiar with, but I’m completely convinced at this point that it’s going to be more trouble than it’s worth. I’ll reupload today with shlibs instead.
Back to linux.debian.bugs.rc | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#966183: abseil FTBFS on !amd64/ppc64: missing symbols Benjamin Barenblat <bbaren@debian.org> - 2020-07-24 15:30 +0200
csiph-web