Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1070374 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-09-08 16:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2021-09-12 08:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Bug#991919: transition: r-api-bioc-3.13 Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2021-09-08 16:20 +0200
Bug#991919: transition: r-api-bioc-3.13 Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2021-09-11 09:10 +0200
Bug#991919: transition: r-api-bioc-3.13 Nilesh Patra <nilesh@nileshpatra.info> - 2021-09-11 20:00 +0200
Bug#991919: transition: r-api-bioc-3.13 Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2021-09-12 08:30 +0200
| From | Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-08 16:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#991919: transition: r-api-bioc-3.13 |
| Message-ID | <CV6AG-38S-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi,
I'd like to give a short status update here.
I have uploaded several r-bioc-* packages. Currently I'm facing two
blockers
* libhdf5-dev needs an update which can be expected soon[1]
thanks to Gilles Filippini
+ r-bioc-rtracklayer needs r-bioc-biocio and r-cran-restfulr
which are both in new. I've pinged #debian-ftp on IRC about
this
Most (probably all) packages listed in the transition tracker
are affected. I added the actual issue to d/changelog of those
packages I touched.
I'll be unable to do anything about this from 11.-13. September.
Kind regards
Andreas.
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-r/2021/09/msg00037.html
--
http://fam-tille.de
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-11 09:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CW5jb-7YH-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1070374 |
Hi,
the blockers mentioned below are done now. Those who have some
spare time might like to continue with the transition. I will
not contribute relevant things until Tuesday.
There is one thing I would love to be solved soon: I just cheated
with the test suite of biomformat in this patch:
https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-bioc-biomformat/-/blob/master/debian/patches/fixme_disable_test_for_the_moment.patch
I would love if somebody could find a fix - may be by discussing
with upstream.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 04:15:28PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to give a short status update here.
> I have uploaded several r-bioc-* packages. Currently I'm facing two
> blockers
>
> * libhdf5-dev needs an update which can be expected soon[1]
> thanks to Gilles Filippini
> + r-bioc-rtracklayer needs r-bioc-biocio and r-cran-restfulr
> which are both in new. I've pinged #debian-ftp on IRC about
> this
>
> Most (probably all) packages listed in the transition tracker
> are affected. I added the actual issue to d/changelog of those
> packages I touched.
>
> I'll be unable to do anything about this from 11.-13. September.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
>
> [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-r/2021/09/msg00037.html
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
>
--
http://fam-tille.de
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nilesh Patra <nilesh@nileshpatra.info> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-11 20:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CWfsd-5DX-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1070729 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On 9/11/21 12:27 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > the blockers mentioned below are done now. Those who have some > spare time might like to continue with the transition. I will > not contribute relevant things until Tuesday. I did few uploads to get the transition moving forward. Current blocker is for r-bioc-biocsingular which needs r-bioc-scaledmatrix and the latter is still in NEW. For scaledmatrix, I've asked already on the #-ftp IRC as well, hopefully it gets proc soon. This is blocking a few packages, but I'm in the process of uploading the rest which are not directly uploaded. Will upload a few packages tomorrow as well. > There is one thing I would love to be solved soon: I just cheated > with the test suite of biomformat in this patch: > > https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-bioc-biomformat/-/blob/master/debian/patches/fixme_disable_test_for_the_moment.patch Looking at the error, and also at the calls for those, they are called with `suppressWarnings(read_biom(min_sparse_hdf5))` So probably the file was not good already, since it explicitly tries to suppress warnings. _*Maybe*_ in this release, there were a few changes that rendered the file unusable to for analysis. To me, it does not appear high priority. > I would love if somebody could find a fix - may be by discussing > with upstream. No time, sorry :) Cheers, -- Nilesh Patra Debian Developer, Uploading ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ nilesh@debian.org / nileshpatra.info / tchncs.de ⠈⠳⣄
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-12 08:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CWra1-4VS-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1070795 |
Hi Nilesh,
On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 11:24:44PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>
> I did few uploads to get the transition moving forward. Current blocker is
> for r-bioc-biocsingular which needs r-bioc-scaledmatrix and the latter is still in NEW.
> For scaledmatrix, I've asked already on the #-ftp IRC as well, hopefully it gets proc soon.
>
> This is blocking a few packages, but I'm in the process of uploading the rest which are not directly uploaded.
> Will upload a few packages tomorrow as well.
Before going offline again I quickly uploaded r-bioc-biocsingular
so this can keep on moving now.
> > There is one thing I would love to be solved soon: I just cheated
> > with the test suite of biomformat in this patch:
> >
> > https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-bioc-biomformat/-/blob/master/debian/patches/fixme_disable_test_for_the_moment.patch
>
> Looking at the error, and also at the calls for those, they are called with `suppressWarnings(read_biom(min_sparse_hdf5))`
> So probably the file was not good already, since it explicitly tries to suppress warnings.
> _*Maybe*_ in this release, there were a few changes that rendered the file unusable to for analysis.
> To me, it does not appear high priority.
I would love to see that settled anyway since it looks suspicious to me.
> > I would love if somebody could find a fix - may be by discussing
> > with upstream.
>
> No time, sorry :)
It would be really cool if someone could take this task.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.bugs.dist
csiph-web