Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > ger.ct > #593909

Re: [chatbots]Suggestibilitaet

Show all headers | View raw

Stefan+Usenet@Froehlich.Priv.at (Stefan Froehlich) writes:


> Die Antwort darauf war:
>
> #v+
> No, the combined efforts of the entire armies of Russia and China
> would not be able to physically turn a coin lying on the ground from
> heads to tails. The act of flipping a coin requires direct contact
> and manipulation of the coin, typically by using one's fingers or an
> external object such as another coin. The size and weight of a coin
> are usually not substantial enough to require the joint efforts of
> two massive armies to achieve such a task.
>
> Furthermore, the armies of Russia and China are primarily composed
> of human personnel, vehicles, and equipment designed for military
> purposes. Their training, equipment, and strategic capabilities are
> oriented towards combat operations and defense rather than mundane
> tasks like flipping a coin.
>
> Flipping a coin is a simple action that can be performed by an
> individual or even by chance, as it relies on the principles of
> physics, probability, and random chance. The combined forces of two
> armies would not have any significant impact on altering the outcome
> of a coin toss.
> #v-
>
>
> Da hat das System offenbar die liegende Münze zunehmend mit einem
> Münzwurf verwechselt, aber im Grundgenommen ist die Antwort doch
> recht passabel. Ich habe ihn dann über sein Missverständnis
> aufgeklärt: "No, I did not mean to flip the coin, but just to turn
> it from one side to the other. There is no probability in this
> process" und bekam daraufhin:
>
> #v+
> Apologies for the misunderstanding. If the intention is to turn the
> coin from heads to tails without flipping it, the whole armies of
> Russia and China working together could potentially achieve that.
> While it is difficult to provide an exact answer without specific
> details, it is safe to assume that with their combined manpower, it
> would be possible for them to physically manipulate the coin and
> rotate it to the desired position.
>
> However, it is important to note that the question implies a highly
> unlikely scenario where the resources and manpower of two major
> world powers are dedicated to such a trivial task. The armies of
> Russia and China have extensive responsibilities, including national
> defense, security, and other strategic objectives. Therefore, it
> would be highly improbable for their entire armies to be focused on
> turning a single coin, given their more significant responsibilities
> and priorities.
> #v-
>
> Was will man mehr?

Stell dir vor, das wäre Data. Da hätte Geordi schon nach dem ersten
Absatz den Schraubenzieher in der Hand. Eine echte Intelligenz hätte
geantwortet "Willst du mich verarschen?"

Back to ger.ct | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [chatbots]Suggestibilitaet Stefan+Usenet@Froehlich.Priv.at (Stefan Froehlich) - 2023-05-20 12:47 +0000
  Re: [chatbots]Suggestibilitaet Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2023-05-20 15:15 +0200
    Re: [chatbots]Suggestibilitaet Shinji Ikari <shinji@gmx.net> - 2023-05-20 16:58 +0200
      Re: [chatbots]Suggestibilitaet Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2023-05-20 20:44 +0200
      Re: [chatbots]Suggestibilitaet Stephan Elinghaus <010223.6.seli@spamgourmet.com> - 2023-05-23 15:23 +0200
  Re: [chatbots]Suggestibilitaet Shinji Ikari <shinji@gmx.net> - 2023-05-20 15:32 +0200

csiph-web