Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > edm.general > #117458 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ted <ted@sam.street> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-11-24 14:28 -0500 |
| Last post | 2019-11-27 11:38 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 450 — 23 participants |
Back to article view | Back to edm.general
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-24 14:28 -0500
Re: My Husband's Books Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-11-24 22:13 +0000
Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-11-24 15:20 -0700
Re: My Husband's Books Scooter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2019-11-24 15:29 -0700
Re: My Husband's Books "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." <greghall@høme.fake> - 2019-11-24 17:25 -0500
Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-11-25 06:14 +0200
Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-26 10:43 -0500
Re: My Husband's Books "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." <greghall@høme.fake> - 2019-11-26 11:06 -0500
Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-26 12:29 -0500
Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-11-26 11:35 -0700
Re: My Husband's Books Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-11-26 22:13 +0000
Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-26 18:43 -0500
Re: My Husband's Books Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-11-27 02:04 +0000
Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-27 12:57 -0500
Re: My Husband's Books Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-11-27 21:49 +0000
Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-27 17:47 -0500
Re: My Husband's Books Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-11-27 23:39 +0000
Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-27 20:42 -0500
Re: My Husband's Books Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-11-28 02:07 +0000
Re: My Husband's Books Scooter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2019-11-27 19:48 -0700
Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-27 22:15 -0500
Re: My Husband's Books Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-11-28 04:50 +0000
Re: My Husband's Books Scooter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2019-11-27 22:22 -0700
Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-28 01:09 -0500
Re: My Husband's Books Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-11-27 22:30 -0800
Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-28 19:19 -0500
Re: My Husband's Books Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-11-27 20:23 -0800
Re: My Husband's Books Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-11-28 05:00 +0000
Re: My Husband's Books Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-11-27 22:04 -0800
Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-24 18:56 -0500
Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-11-24 17:05 -0700
Re: My Husband's Books Scooter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2019-11-24 17:11 -0700
Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-11-24 17:42 -0700
Re: My Husband's Books Scooter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2019-11-24 17:08 -0700
Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-25 17:37 -0500
Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-11-25 06:28 +0200
Re: My Husband's Books Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-11-25 04:44 +0000
Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-25 17:51 -0500
Re: My Husband's Books Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-11-25 23:03 +0000
Re: My Husband's Books Scooter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2019-11-25 16:14 -0700
Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-26 10:28 -0500
Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-11-26 11:35 -0700
Re: My Husband's Books vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-11-27 20:47 +0000
Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-27 15:51 -0500
Re: My Husband's Books vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-11-28 03:39 +0000
Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-28 12:14 -0500
Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-11-28 10:17 -0700
Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-25 19:08 -0500
Re: My Husband's Books Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-11-26 03:01 +0000
Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-11-25 20:05 -0700
Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-26 01:40 -0500
NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-11-26 10:45 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2019-11-26 09:16 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-11-26 22:16 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2019-11-27 08:27 +0000
NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-26 08:10 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-11-26 11:34 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-11-26 10:59 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-11-26 12:06 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-26 15:17 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-11-26 13:23 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-11-26 22:26 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-11-26 22:25 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-26 18:42 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-11-27 02:11 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Scooter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2019-11-26 19:36 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2019-11-27 08:30 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-11-27 21:51 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-27 17:50 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-11-27 16:08 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-11-27 23:42 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-27 21:03 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-11-28 02:09 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-27 21:51 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-11-27 20:49 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-11-28 02:53 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Scooter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2019-11-27 20:15 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-27 22:41 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-11-28 07:05 +0200
NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-11-28 05:58 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-11-27 22:07 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Scooter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2019-11-28 00:08 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-28 19:44 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-28 19:43 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-11-29 05:54 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-29 13:02 -0500
TED PROVES ATHEISTS ARE TROLLS % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-11-29 11:08 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-11-30 05:51 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-30 00:42 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-11-30 09:09 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-30 11:20 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-01 05:47 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-01 04:43 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-12-02 08:29 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-03 15:29 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-12-04 06:08 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-04 16:25 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-04 14:29 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-04 16:42 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-04 14:47 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-04 17:29 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." <greghall@høme.fake> - 2019-12-04 17:44 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-04 17:48 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." <greghall@høme.fake> - 2019-12-04 17:54 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-04 18:16 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." <greghall@høme.fake> - 2019-12-04 18:21 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-04 19:18 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-04 15:49 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-04 17:57 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-12-05 09:08 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-05 11:53 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." <greghall@høme.fake> - 2019-12-05 14:17 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-05 12:18 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." <greghall@høme.fake> - 2019-12-05 14:25 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-05 12:29 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-12-05 20:27 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-12-05 20:38 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-12-05 21:01 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-12-05 22:53 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Sharx335 <sharx35@telus.net> - 2019-12-05 13:55 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Scooter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2019-12-05 14:46 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-05 18:37 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Sharx335 <sharx35@telus.net> - 2019-12-05 16:40 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Sharx335 - 2019-12-05 16:43 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-05 16:41 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-05 18:48 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-06 07:34 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Scooter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2019-12-06 08:38 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-07 22:10 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2019-12-08 09:09 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-08 15:32 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." <greghall@høme.fake> - 2019-12-08 12:27 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2019-12-08 19:53 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-08 15:32 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." <greghall@høme.fake> - 2019-12-06 11:10 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-07 22:11 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-08 12:46 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-08 15:34 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-09 05:38 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-09 03:33 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-12-09 20:39 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." <greghall@høme.fake> - 2019-12-09 15:45 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-09 20:11 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-09 21:36 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-10 05:54 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-10 20:18 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-11 05:36 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-12-10 22:24 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-11 02:18 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-12-11 22:41 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-11 19:01 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-12 05:24 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-11 20:46 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-12 15:13 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-13 05:58 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-13 03:57 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Sharx335 <sharx35@telus.net> - 2019-12-13 10:01 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-13 15:42 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Sharx335 <sharx35@telus.net> - 2019-12-13 15:10 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books !valid@!valid.invalid (Ï) - 2019-12-13 22:17 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-13 17:26 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-12-13 22:00 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-13 18:48 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Scooter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2019-12-13 16:56 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-13 20:57 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Checkmate <More.Bull.Schiff@gmail.com> - 2019-12-13 20:50 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-14 14:04 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-14 12:11 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-14 15:30 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-14 13:39 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-14 15:46 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-14 13:52 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-14 16:04 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-14 14:15 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-14 16:25 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-14 16:13 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-14 20:01 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Scooter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2019-12-14 18:05 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Scooter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2019-12-14 17:59 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-14 18:44 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-14 21:12 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-14 19:20 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-14 21:32 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-14 19:45 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-14 22:28 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-14 20:34 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-14 23:08 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-14 21:20 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-14 23:22 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-15 07:40 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street.> - 2019-12-15 03:15 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." <greghall@høme.fake> - 2019-12-15 11:43 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street.> - 2019-12-19 15:45 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-19 06:16 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street.> - 2019-12-19 15:57 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2019-12-19 21:03 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street.> - 2019-12-19 17:38 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2019-12-19 22:53 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street.> - 2019-12-19 18:59 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Checkmate <More.Bull.Schiff@gmail.com> - 2019-12-15 09:53 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." <greghall@høme.fake> - 2019-12-15 16:53 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Checkmate <More.Bull.Schiff@gmail.com> - 2019-12-15 16:08 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-19 06:18 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-12-20 22:01 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Scooter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2019-12-20 15:55 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-24 16:39 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Scooter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2019-12-14 17:58 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-14 18:32 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-14 20:52 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-14 18:57 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-14 21:38 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-14 19:47 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-14 22:30 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-14 20:37 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-14 23:41 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-14 21:43 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street.> - 2019-12-19 17:05 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-19 15:09 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street.> - 2019-12-19 17:31 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-19 15:50 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street.> - 2019-12-19 18:47 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-19 16:59 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street.> - 2019-12-19 19:09 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-19 17:12 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street.> - 2019-12-20 15:31 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-12-20 22:05 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-20 15:10 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street.> - 2019-12-20 18:02 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-20 16:07 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street.> - 2019-12-20 20:58 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-20 19:12 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-21 23:57 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-22 06:32 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-22 10:23 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Checkmate <More.Bull.Schiff@gmail.com> - 2019-12-21 11:31 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Scooter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2019-12-14 21:53 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-14 22:01 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street.> - 2019-12-19 17:07 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Checkmate <More.Bull.Schiff@gmail.com> - 2019-12-15 09:56 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-12-12 14:40 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-12-08 03:19 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-08 15:36 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-06 15:49 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-05 18:43 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Sharx335 <sharx35@telus.net> - 2019-12-05 16:46 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-05 16:56 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-05 19:08 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2019-12-05 23:56 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Sharx335 <sharx35@telus.net> - 2019-12-05 17:07 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2019-12-06 00:22 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-05 17:24 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2019-12-06 00:29 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-07 22:03 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-07 22:02 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-07 22:01 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-05 19:08 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Sharx35 - 2019-12-05 17:10 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Sharx335 <sharx35@telus.net> - 2019-12-05 17:11 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-05 17:13 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-05 19:26 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-05 17:30 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-05 19:36 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-05 17:42 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-06 15:50 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Scooter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2019-12-05 17:47 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-06 15:52 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2019-12-06 00:27 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-05 17:31 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-12-06 01:38 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-05 18:50 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-05 19:05 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Sharx335 <sharx35@telus.net> - 2019-12-05 17:10 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-05 17:14 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-05 19:19 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Scooter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2019-12-05 17:49 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-05 18:03 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Sharx335 <sharx35@telus.net> - 2019-12-05 18:35 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-05 18:48 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-06 15:08 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Sharx335 <sharx35@telus.net> - 2019-12-06 13:10 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-06 13:20 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2019-12-06 20:25 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-06 13:32 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Scooter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2019-12-06 14:20 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-06 16:19 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Scooter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2019-12-05 17:48 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Scooter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2019-12-05 17:45 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2019-12-05 21:24 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-05 18:42 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Scooter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2019-12-05 14:45 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-05 18:38 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-05 16:53 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-05 19:07 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-05 17:15 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-05 18:34 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." <greghall@høme.fake> - 2019-12-05 19:04 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-05 17:14 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2019-12-04 21:46 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-04 14:53 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Scooter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2019-12-04 15:00 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." <greghall@høme.fake> - 2019-12-04 17:13 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-04 15:38 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2019-12-04 22:44 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-04 15:46 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-12-06 02:07 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-04 17:44 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-05 10:46 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-05 17:11 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-06 07:40 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-06 15:56 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-12-05 09:07 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-05 11:52 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-05 18:32 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-06 07:44 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-06 15:48 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-05 18:31 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-06 07:42 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-12-06 01:56 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-06 12:50 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-07 22:12 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-12-08 03:24 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." <greghall@høme.fake> - 2019-12-08 12:21 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-12-08 13:07 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-12-08 21:47 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." <greghall@høme.fake> - 2019-12-08 17:43 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-09 05:40 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." <greghall@høme.fake> - 2019-12-09 10:01 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-12-09 20:41 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-12-09 23:07 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-11 05:38 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-12-10 22:22 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-12-11 22:42 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-11 19:14 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-12 05:25 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-12 15:19 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-13 05:59 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-13 04:03 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-12-13 22:02 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-13 17:53 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-14 05:20 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-13 20:34 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-14 11:56 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-15 07:43 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Checkmate <More.Bull.Schiff@gmail.com> - 2019-12-15 10:03 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Checkmate <More.Bull.Schiff@gmail.com> - 2019-12-13 20:53 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-14 14:09 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-15 07:43 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Checkmate <More.Bull.Schiff@gmail.com> - 2019-12-15 10:02 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-12-12 14:42 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-08 15:38 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-12-08 13:47 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-08 17:27 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-12-06 15:25 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books invalid@!nvalid.invalid (Ï) - 2019-12-06 16:59 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-11-28 08:19 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-11-27 22:32 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-28 19:48 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-11-28 17:52 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-11-29 05:56 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-11-29 09:26 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-01 05:51 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-01 04:51 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-02 05:56 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." <greghall@høme.fake> - 2019-12-02 10:06 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-02 18:35 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-03 05:56 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-03 02:26 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-03 11:44 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-03 15:28 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-04 05:44 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-04 16:23 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-05 10:50 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-05 17:17 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-12-05 09:08 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-05 18:40 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." <greghall@høme.fake> - 2019-12-05 18:59 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-05 19:25 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-06 07:45 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Scooter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2019-12-06 08:39 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-06 16:11 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Scooter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2019-12-06 14:24 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-07 23:14 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-29 13:45 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-11-28 07:20 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2019-11-28 08:29 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-28 19:46 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-11-27 22:06 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-11-27 19:42 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2019-11-28 08:27 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Scooter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2019-11-28 04:54 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-28 19:53 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Kernal Korn <vet@invalid.com> - 2019-11-27 16:22 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-27 22:43 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-11-27 20:50 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-11-28 05:06 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-11-27 21:45 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-28 19:18 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-11-28 17:22 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-11-29 05:58 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-11-29 09:27 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-11-30 05:54 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-29 23:10 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-11-30 06:42 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-30 10:34 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-11-30 18:02 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-30 13:42 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-11-30 11:46 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-01 05:52 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-01 04:53 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-02 05:58 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." <greghall@høme.fake> - 2019-11-30 10:54 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-30 14:21 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-11-30 12:28 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-11-30 22:19 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-30 17:21 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted - 2019-11-30 15:26 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Peter Pan <pan@172.16.1.1> - 2019-12-02 00:40 +0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-02 06:00 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." <greghall@høme.fake> - 2019-12-02 10:09 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Peter Pan <pan@172.16.1.1> - 2019-12-03 06:53 +0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." <greghall@høme.fake> - 2019-12-02 18:43 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-02 16:57 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-03 05:58 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." <greghall@høme.fake> - 2019-12-03 10:19 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-03 16:36 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-03 16:20 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-03 14:25 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-03 17:43 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-03 16:19 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-03 16:17 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-03 16:15 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-03 14:21 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-03 17:29 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-04 05:46 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-04 15:47 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-12-03 14:24 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-01 05:55 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-01 04:55 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-12-02 08:31 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." <greghall@høme.fake> - 2019-12-02 10:12 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-03 16:30 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-12-04 05:48 +0200
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-12-04 15:52 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-29 13:07 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-27 13:01 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Scooter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2019-11-27 11:25 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-27 14:21 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Scooter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2019-11-27 16:20 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books Ted <ted@sam.street> - 2019-11-27 18:29 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: My Husband's Books % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-11-27 11:38 -0700
Page 1 of 23 [1] 2 3 … 23 Next page →
| From | Ted <ted@sam.street> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-24 14:28 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: My Husband's Books |
| Message-ID | <almarsoft.4614232601755264891@us.news.astraweb.com> |
On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 06:18:56 +0200, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > On 11/23/2019 9:26 PM, Ted wrote: > > Dichotomy fallacy, Nadega. Ya see, the right has had 100 years ,(and > > almost limitless funds) to perfect their propaganda. As a result, you > > libtards are more solidly right-wing than the deplorables who voted for > > Trump, many of whom would have been leftists if that option existed. > > Both the Republican and the Democratic parties are right-wing, with the > > "left" having been redefined for them to keep in control. > This is weirdly full of half-truths. But it ignores several key facts: > 1. Nadegda and I are both genuine leftists: we want more taxation, > workplace democracy (beyond mere unionization if possible), and a > greatly expanded social safety net, as well as more government > investment in infrastructure, housing, and health care. Those concessions are granted in proportion to the threat from Communism. Almost immediately after the Soviet Union collapsed, the Democratic Party shifter sharply to the right and, in a sleight of hand worthy of Houdini, substituted other social issues in exchange for their previous support for labor. They now champion solely those issues that meet two criteria, (1) they have to be economically neutral and (2) ideally, they should ensure that the working class remains divided. And both parties have been gradually removing freedoms since Reagan. > 2. So are a growing number of Democrats, notably Bernie Sanders and > Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. A lot of us had high hopes for Bernie, but he showed us his colors when, after the DNC screwed him out of the primary, he supported Hillary. It was the left's best chance for a third party and he threw it away. Bernie and AOC serve the establishment as sheepdogs to herd leftists back into the Democratic Party. > 3. You are conflating centrists with the genuine left more generally. A bit, perhaps, but even the "genuine" leftists are brainwashed against their own self interests. > > I was born dirt poor, actually. And I worked in a coal mine until I was > > 35 yo. The only time in my life I voted Republican was when the UMWA > > endorsed Santorum during the 80s. > And yet here you are slinging schoolyard name-calling at anyone who > vocally criticizes the Trump regime, which is so far right it is scary. The working class who tipped the scales to elect Trump. It was either believe him or vote for a proven backstabber. If his campaign promises had been fulfilled, the common folk would have indeed benefitted and that's one of the reasons the establishment hated him almost from the beginning. The other reason is that he was outside of their approved circle of presidential candidates. So they've been lying about him since 2016 and most of you idiots swallow their lies.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-24 22:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <qrev9o$rfo$14@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #117458 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 14:28:18 -0500, Ted wrote: > On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 06:18:56 +0200, kensi > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> On 11/23/2019 9:26 PM, Ted wrote: >> > Dichotomy fallacy, Nadega. Ya see, the right has had 100 years > ,(and >> > almost limitless funds) to perfect their propaganda. As a result, > you >> > libtards are more solidly right-wing than the deplorables who > voted for >> > Trump, many of whom would have been leftists if that option > existed. >> > Both the Republican and the Democratic parties are right-wing, > with the >> > "left" having been redefined for them to keep in control. > > >> This is weirdly full of half-truths. But it ignores several key > facts: > > >> 1. Nadegda and I are both genuine leftists: we want more taxation, >> workplace democracy (beyond mere unionization if possible), and > a >> greatly expanded social safety net, as well as more government >> investment in infrastructure, housing, and health care. > > Those concessions are granted in proportion to the threat from > Communism. Almost immediately after the Soviet Union collapsed, the > Democratic Party shifter sharply to the right and, in a sleight of hand > worthy of Houdini, substituted other social issues in exchange for their > previous support for labor. > > They now champion solely those issues that meet two criteria, (1) they > have to be economically neutral and (2) ideally, they should ensure that > the working class remains divided. And both parties have been gradually > removing freedoms since Reagan. That does not contradict what kensi said. >> 2. So are a growing number of Democrats, notably Bernie Sanders and >> Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. > > A lot of us had high hopes for Bernie, but he showed us his colors when, > after the DNC screwed him out of the primary, he supported Hillary. It > was the left's best chance for a third party and he threw it away. > Bernie and AOC serve the establishment as sheepdogs to herd leftists > back into the Democratic Party. Based on the noises coming from some of the other candidates on the debate stages, I'm not sure they're not in fact herding centrist Dems back into the FDR compact. >> 3. You are conflating centrists with the genuine left more > generally. > > A bit, perhaps, but even the "genuine" leftists are brainwashed against > their own self interests. I'd say "speak for yourself", except that I doubt you're a genuine leftist. >> > I was born dirt poor, actually. And I worked in a coal mine until > I was >> > 35 yo. The only time in my life I voted Republican was when the > UMWA >> > endorsed Santorum during the 80s. >> And yet here you are slinging schoolyard name-calling at anyone who >> vocally criticizes the Trump regime, which is so far right it is > scary. > > The working class who tipped the scales to elect Trump. Wrong: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/06/05/its- time-to-bust-the-myth-most-trump-voters-were-not-working-class/ https://solidarity-us.org/atc/186/p4859/ ---------- The relatively high-income levels of much of Trump's vote point toward a majority petty bourgeois and middle-class base for Trump ---------- > It was either believe him or vote for a proven backstabber. If his > campaign promises had been fulfilled, the common folk would have indeed > benefitted From a giant boondoggle of a useless wall? From racist immigration bans? From even more giant tax cuts for the rich? The only remotely good thing I ever heard him promise was a $1.5 trillion infrastructure spend, which of course never happened and which of course he had no intention of ever doing. > and that's one of the reasons the establishment hated him almost from the > beginning. The other reason is that he was outside of their approved > circle of presidential candidates. The fact that he's a fascist might also have something to do with it. Surely it didn't escape your notice when he tacitly endorsed that Nazi march in Charlottesville? The one during which one of the Nazis murdered a woman? > So they've been lying about him since 2016 and most of you idiots > swallow their lies. The lies being told about Trump are the self-flattering narcissistic babblings of Trump himself, and similar burblefroth emitted by his sycophants. Every nasty thing that has been said about Trump has proven to be true: that he's a racist, that he's a fascist, that he's a rapist ... -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-24 15:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <cnbl85.tt9.17.29@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #118217 |
On 2019-11-24 3:13 p.m., Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 14:28:18 -0500, Ted wrote: > >> On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 06:18:56 +0200, kensi >> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> On 11/23/2019 9:26 PM, Ted wrote: >>>> Dichotomy fallacy, Nadega. Ya see, the right has had 100 years >> ,(and >>>> almost limitless funds) to perfect their propaganda. As a result, >> you >>>> libtards are more solidly right-wing than the deplorables who >> voted for >>>> Trump, many of whom would have been leftists if that option >> existed. >>>> Both the Republican and the Democratic parties are right-wing, >> with the >>>> "left" having been redefined for them to keep in control. >> >> >>> This is weirdly full of half-truths. But it ignores several key >> facts: >> >> >>> 1. Nadegda and I are both genuine leftists: we want more taxation, >>> workplace democracy (beyond mere unionization if possible), and >> a >>> greatly expanded social safety net, as well as more government >>> investment in infrastructure, housing, and health care. >> >> Those concessions are granted in proportion to the threat from >> Communism. Almost immediately after the Soviet Union collapsed, the >> Democratic Party shifter sharply to the right and, in a sleight of hand >> worthy of Houdini, substituted other social issues in exchange for their >> previous support for labor. >> >> They now champion solely those issues that meet two criteria, (1) they >> have to be economically neutral and (2) ideally, they should ensure that >> the working class remains divided. And both parties have been gradually >> removing freedoms since Reagan. > > That does not contradict what kensi said. > >>> 2. So are a growing number of Democrats, notably Bernie Sanders and >>> Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. >> >> A lot of us had high hopes for Bernie, but he showed us his colors when, >> after the DNC screwed him out of the primary, he supported Hillary. It >> was the left's best chance for a third party and he threw it away. >> Bernie and AOC serve the establishment as sheepdogs to herd leftists >> back into the Democratic Party. > > Based on the noises coming from some of the other candidates on the debate > stages, I'm not sure they're not in fact herding centrist Dems back into > the FDR compact. > >>> 3. You are conflating centrists with the genuine left more >> generally. >> >> A bit, perhaps, but even the "genuine" leftists are brainwashed against >> their own self interests. > > I'd say "speak for yourself", except that I doubt you're a genuine leftist. > >>>> I was born dirt poor, actually. And I worked in a coal mine until >> I was >>>> 35 yo. The only time in my life I voted Republican was when the >> UMWA >>>> endorsed Santorum during the 80s. >>> And yet here you are slinging schoolyard name-calling at anyone who >>> vocally criticizes the Trump regime, which is so far right it is >> scary. >> >> The working class who tipped the scales to elect Trump. > > Wrong: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/06/05/its- > time-to-bust-the-myth-most-trump-voters-were-not-working-class/ > > https://solidarity-us.org/atc/186/p4859/ > > ---------- > The relatively high-income levels of much of Trump's vote point toward a > majority petty bourgeois and middle-class base for Trump > ---------- > >> It was either believe him or vote for a proven backstabber. If his >> campaign promises had been fulfilled, the common folk would have indeed >> benefitted > > From a giant boondoggle of a useless wall? From racist immigration bans? > From even more giant tax cuts for the rich? > > The only remotely good thing I ever heard him promise was a $1.5 trillion > infrastructure spend, which of course never happened and which of course > he had no intention of ever doing. > >> and that's one of the reasons the establishment hated him almost from the >> beginning. The other reason is that he was outside of their approved >> circle of presidential candidates. > > The fact that he's a fascist might also have something to do with it. > Surely it didn't escape your notice when he tacitly endorsed that Nazi > march in Charlottesville? The one during which one of the Nazis murdered a > woman? > >> So they've been lying about him since 2016 and most of you idiots >> swallow their lies. > > The lies being told about Trump are the self-flattering narcissistic > babblings of Trump himself, and similar burblefroth emitted by his > sycophants. > > Every nasty thing that has been said about Trump has proven to be true: > that he's a racist, that he's a fascist, that he's a rapist ... > so he's a typical guy , big deal
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Scooter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-24 15:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <221mte5vgaunidr092c7mmav0ecteqprmj@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #118218 |
On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 15:20:18 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2019-11-24 3:13 p.m., Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 14:28:18 -0500, Ted wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 06:18:56 +0200, kensi >>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> On 11/23/2019 9:26 PM, Ted wrote: >>>>> Dichotomy fallacy, Nadega. Ya see, the right has had 100 years >>> ,(and >>>>> almost limitless funds) to perfect their propaganda. As a result, >>> you >>>>> libtards are more solidly right-wing than the deplorables who >>> voted for >>>>> Trump, many of whom would have been leftists if that option >>> existed. >>>>> Both the Republican and the Democratic parties are right-wing, >>> with the >>>>> "left" having been redefined for them to keep in control. >>> >>> >>>> This is weirdly full of half-truths. But it ignores several key >>> facts: >>> >>> >>>> 1. Nadegda and I are both genuine leftists: we want more taxation, >>>> workplace democracy (beyond mere unionization if possible), and >>> a >>>> greatly expanded social safety net, as well as more government >>>> investment in infrastructure, housing, and health care. >>> >>> Those concessions are granted in proportion to the threat from >>> Communism. Almost immediately after the Soviet Union collapsed, the >>> Democratic Party shifter sharply to the right and, in a sleight of hand >>> worthy of Houdini, substituted other social issues in exchange for their >>> previous support for labor. >>> >>> They now champion solely those issues that meet two criteria, (1) they >>> have to be economically neutral and (2) ideally, they should ensure that >>> the working class remains divided. And both parties have been gradually >>> removing freedoms since Reagan. >> >> That does not contradict what kensi said. >> >>>> 2. So are a growing number of Democrats, notably Bernie Sanders and >>>> Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. >>> >>> A lot of us had high hopes for Bernie, but he showed us his colors when, >>> after the DNC screwed him out of the primary, he supported Hillary. It >>> was the left's best chance for a third party and he threw it away. >>> Bernie and AOC serve the establishment as sheepdogs to herd leftists >>> back into the Democratic Party. >> >> Based on the noises coming from some of the other candidates on the debate >> stages, I'm not sure they're not in fact herding centrist Dems back into >> the FDR compact. >> >>>> 3. You are conflating centrists with the genuine left more >>> generally. >>> >>> A bit, perhaps, but even the "genuine" leftists are brainwashed against >>> their own self interests. >> >> I'd say "speak for yourself", except that I doubt you're a genuine leftist. >> >>>>> I was born dirt poor, actually. And I worked in a coal mine until >>> I was >>>>> 35 yo. The only time in my life I voted Republican was when the >>> UMWA >>>>> endorsed Santorum during the 80s. >>>> And yet here you are slinging schoolyard name-calling at anyone who >>>> vocally criticizes the Trump regime, which is so far right it is >>> scary. >>> >>> The working class who tipped the scales to elect Trump. >> >> Wrong: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/06/05/its- >> time-to-bust-the-myth-most-trump-voters-were-not-working-class/ >> >> https://solidarity-us.org/atc/186/p4859/ >> >> ---------- >> The relatively high-income levels of much of Trump's vote point toward a >> majority petty bourgeois and middle-class base for Trump >> ---------- >> >>> It was either believe him or vote for a proven backstabber. If his >>> campaign promises had been fulfilled, the common folk would have indeed >>> benefitted >> >> From a giant boondoggle of a useless wall? From racist immigration bans? >> From even more giant tax cuts for the rich? >> >> The only remotely good thing I ever heard him promise was a $1.5 trillion >> infrastructure spend, which of course never happened and which of course >> he had no intention of ever doing. >> >>> and that's one of the reasons the establishment hated him almost from the >>> beginning. The other reason is that he was outside of their approved >>> circle of presidential candidates. >> >> The fact that he's a fascist might also have something to do with it. >> Surely it didn't escape your notice when he tacitly endorsed that Nazi >> march in Charlottesville? The one during which one of the Nazis murdered a >> woman? >> >>> So they've been lying about him since 2016 and most of you idiots >>> swallow their lies. >> >> The lies being told about Trump are the self-flattering narcissistic >> babblings of Trump himself, and similar burblefroth emitted by his >> sycophants. >> >> Every nasty thing that has been said about Trump has proven to be true: >> that he's a racist, that he's a fascist, that he's a rapist ... >> >so he's a typical guy , big deal All those accusations and yet no proof.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." <greghall@høme.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-24 17:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <uk0mtedlca0q3peurs5t8h4i636fglofcm@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #118217 |
On Sun, 24 Nov 2019, Nadegda <nadzi318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >Wrong: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/06/05/its- >time-to-bust-the-myth-most-trump-voters-were-not-working-class/ Link is wrapped and borked, as usual. One would thing a cunt who claims to code for a living would be able to avoid being and looking so stupid in public. The Washington Post is a liberal/leftist/communist rag. What else would you expect from them but bias and lies? Expecting political accuracy out of them is tantamount to expecting you to be able to post a link that isn't wrapped and borked. -- Yours Truly, Sir Gregory Nadegda, kensi, Fran, Pandora » these are easily ignøred misandrists and anti-American, leftist liars.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-25 06:14 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qrfkev$1k2q$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #118221 |
On 11/24/2019 5:25 PM, "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." wrote: > The Washington Post is a liberal/leftist/communist rag. *titter* It's owned by a fucking billionaire capitalist, you moron. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ted <ted@sam.street> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-26 10:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <almarsoft.5132517050128098226@us.news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #118260 |
On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 06:14:22 +0200, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > On 11/24/2019 5:25 PM, "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." wrote: > > The Washington Post is a liberal/leftist/communist rag. > *titter* > It's owned by a fucking billionaire capitalist, you moron. The terms 'left' and 'right' have deliberately been redefined. According to the 2019 definition, WaPo is leftist.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." <greghall@høme.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-26 11:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <t9jqte5kbajmbes2c0rso9ajpl7a6n96fk@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #118334 |
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 10:43:33 -0500, Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: >On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 06:14:22 +0200, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> On 11/24/2019 5:25 PM, "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." wrote: >> > The Washington Post is a liberal/leftist/communist rag. > > >> *titter* > > >> It's owned by a fucking billionaire capitalist, you moron. > > >The terms 'left' and 'right' have deliberately been redefined. >According to the 2019 definition, WaPo is leftist. That's why it's known in intelligent circles as the Washington "Compost". -- Yours Truly, Sir Gregory Nadegda, kensi, Fran, Pandora » these are easily ignøred misandrists and anti-American, leftist liars.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ted <ted@sam.street> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-26 12:29 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <almarsoft.3511713509904345779@us.news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #118337 |
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 11:06:06 -0500, "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq."<greghall@h?me.fake> wrote: > On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 10:43:33 -0500, Ted <ted@sam.street> wrote: > >On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 06:14:22 +0200, kensi = > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > >> On 11/24/2019 5:25 PM, "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." wrote: > >> > The Washington Post is a liberal/leftist/communist rag. > > > > > >> *titter* > > > > > >> It's owned by a fucking billionaire capitalist, you moron. > > > > > >The terms 'left' and 'right' have deliberately been redefined. > >According to the 2019 definition, WaPo is leftist. > That's why it's known in intelligent circles as the > Washington "Compost". LOL. > -- > Yours Truly, Sir Gregory > Nadegda, kensi, Fran, Pandora » these are easily > ignøred misandrists and anti-American, leftist liars. Fran the austard?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-26 11:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <cnggre.p2j.19.7@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #118334 |
On 2019-11-26 8:43 a.m., Ted wrote: > On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 06:14:22 +0200, kensi > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> On 11/24/2019 5:25 PM, "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." wrote: >> > The Washington Post is a liberal/leftist/communist rag. > > >> *titter* > > >> It's owned by a fucking billionaire capitalist, you moron. > > > The terms 'left' and 'right' have deliberately been redefined. According > to the 2019 definition, WaPo is leftist. you don't believe there's a god so nothing you say counts
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-26 22:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <qrk82t$rfo$29@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #118334 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 10:43:33 -0500, Ted wrote: > On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 06:14:22 +0200, kensi > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> On 11/24/2019 5:25 PM, "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." wrote: >> > The Washington Post is a liberal/leftist/communist rag. > > >> *titter* > > >> It's owned by a fucking billionaire capitalist, you moron. > > > The terms 'left' and 'right' have deliberately been redefined. > According to the 2019 definition, WaPo is leftist. It's center-right. You'd like it. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ted <ted@sam.street> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-26 18:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <almarsoft.8395935744455817684@us.news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #118346 |
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 22:13:49 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 10:43:33 -0500, Ted wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 06:14:22 +0200, kensi > > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > >> On 11/24/2019 5:25 PM, "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." wrote: > >> > The Washington Post is a liberal/leftist/communist rag. > > > > > >> *titter* > > > > > >> It's owned by a fucking billionaire capitalist, you moron. > > > > > > The terms 'left' and 'right' have deliberately been redefined. > > According to the 2019 definition, WaPo is leftist. > It's center-right. You'd like it. > -- > FNVWe Nadegda You haven't the slightest clue.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-27 02:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <qrklin$dkv$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #118351 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:43:49 -0500, Ted wrote: > On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 22:13:49 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > melt! >> On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 10:43:33 -0500, Ted wrote: > > >> > On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 06:14:22 +0200, kensi >> > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> >> On 11/24/2019 5:25 PM, "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." wrote: >> >> > The Washington Post is a liberal/leftist/communist rag. >> > >> > >> >> *titter* >> > >> > >> >> It's owned by a fucking billionaire capitalist, you moron. >> > >> > >> > The terms 'left' and 'right' have deliberately been redefined. >> > According to the 2019 definition, WaPo is leftist. > > >> It's center-right. You'd like it. > >> -- >> FNVWe Nadegda > > > You haven't the slightest clue. ... says the snipping coward who hasn't the slightest clue. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ted <ted@sam.street> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-27 12:57 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <almarsoft.6791432478913312252@us.news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #118352 |
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 02:04:07 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:43:49 -0500, Ted wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 22:13:49 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > > melt! > >> On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 10:43:33 -0500, Ted wrote: > > > > > >> > On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 06:14:22 +0200, kensi > >> > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > >> >> On 11/24/2019 5:25 PM, "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." wrote: > >> >> > The Washington Post is a liberal/leftist/communist rag. > >> > > >> > > >> >> *titter* > >> > > >> > > >> >> It's owned by a fucking billionaire capitalist, you moron. > >> > > >> > > >> > The terms 'left' and 'right' have deliberately been redefined. > >> > According to the 2019 definition, WaPo is leftist. > > > > > >> It's center-right. You'd like it. > > > >> -- > >> FNVWe Nadegda > > > > > > You haven't the slightest clue. > ... says the snipping coward who hasn't the slightest clue. > FNVWe Nadegda LOL. You're such a contemptible little liar. Snipping is your MO, not mine.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-27 21:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <qrmr0n$dkv$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #118383 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 12:57:19 -0500, Ted wrote: > On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 02:04:07 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > melt! >> On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:43:49 -0500, Ted wrote: > > >> > On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 22:13:49 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >> > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, > snowflakes, >> > melt! >> >> On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 10:43:33 -0500, Ted wrote: >> > >> > >> >> > On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 06:14:22 +0200, kensi >> >> > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> >> >> On 11/24/2019 5:25 PM, "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." wrote: >> >> >> > The Washington Post is a liberal/leftist/communist rag. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> *titter* >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> It's owned by a fucking billionaire capitalist, you moron. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > The terms 'left' and 'right' have deliberately been redefined. >> >> > According to the 2019 definition, WaPo is leftist. >> > >> > >> >> It's center-right. You'd like it. >> > >> >> -- >> >> FNVWe Nadegda >> > >> > >> > You haven't the slightest clue. > > >> ... says the snipping coward who hasn't the slightest clue. > > >> FNVWe Nadegda > > > LOL. You're such a contemptible little liar. Snipping is your MO, not > mine. Proof, kook? -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ted <ted@sam.street> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-27 17:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <almarsoft.7535853284862287621@us.news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #118401 |
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 21:49:12 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 12:57:19 -0500, Ted wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 02:04:07 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > > melt! > >> On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:43:49 -0500, Ted wrote: > > > > > >> > On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 22:13:49 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > >> > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, > > snowflakes, > >> > melt! > >> >> On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 10:43:33 -0500, Ted wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> >> > On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 06:14:22 +0200, kensi > >> >> > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > >> >> >> On 11/24/2019 5:25 PM, "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." wrote: > >> >> >> > The Washington Post is a liberal/leftist/communist rag. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >> *titter* > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >> It's owned by a fucking billionaire capitalist, you moron. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > The terms 'left' and 'right' have deliberately been redefined. > >> >> > According to the 2019 definition, WaPo is leftist. > >> > > >> > > >> >> It's center-right. You'd like it. > >> > > >> >> -- > >> >> FNVWe Nadegda > >> > > >> > > >> > You haven't the slightest clue. > > > > > >> ... says the snipping coward who hasn't the slightest clue. > > > > > >> FNVWe Nadegda > > > > > > LOL. You're such a contemptible little liar. Snipping is your MO, not > > mine. > Proof, kook? > -- > FNVWe Nadegda Sure. This thread (and the "nomination" branch). Can I be more specific? Yes, but you've already taught me that won't matter. So keep lying.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-27 23:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <qrn1g1$dkv$7@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #118413 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 17:47:42 -0500, Ted wrote: > On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 21:49:12 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > melt! >> On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 12:57:19 -0500, Ted wrote: > > >> > On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 02:04:07 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >> > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, > snowflakes, >> > melt! >> >> On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:43:49 -0500, Ted wrote: >> > >> > >> >> > On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 22:13:49 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >> >> > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >> > snowflakes, >> >> > melt! >> >> >> On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 10:43:33 -0500, Ted wrote: >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> > On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 06:14:22 +0200, kensi >> >> >> > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 11/24/2019 5:25 PM, "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." wrote: >> >> >> >> > The Washington Post is a liberal/leftist/communist rag. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> *titter* >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> It's owned by a fucking billionaire capitalist, you moron. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > The terms 'left' and 'right' have deliberately been > redefined. >> >> >> > According to the 2019 definition, WaPo is leftist. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> It's center-right. You'd like it. >> >> > >> >> >> -- >> >> >> FNVWe Nadegda >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > You haven't the slightest clue. >> > >> > >> >> ... says the snipping coward who hasn't the slightest clue. >> > >> > >> >> FNVWe Nadegda >> > >> > >> > LOL. You're such a contemptible little liar. Snipping is your MO, > not >> > mine. > > >> Proof, kook? >> -- >> FNVWe Nadegda > > > Sure. This thread (and the "nomination" branch). Can I be more > specific? Yes, but you've already taught me that won't matter. So > keep lying. Translation: "I don't have any proof, but that won't stop me from blowing smoke." Par for the course from you. <snicker> -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ted <ted@sam.street> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-27 20:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <almarsoft.6948289109267086108@us.news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #118426 |
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 23:39:46 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 17:47:42 -0500, Ted wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 21:49:12 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > > melt! > >> On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 12:57:19 -0500, Ted wrote: > > > > > >> > On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 02:04:07 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > >> > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, > > snowflakes, > >> > melt! > >> >> On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:43:49 -0500, Ted wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> >> > On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 22:13:49 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > >> >> > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, > >> > snowflakes, > >> >> > melt! > >> >> >> On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 10:43:33 -0500, Ted wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >> > On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 06:14:22 +0200, kensi > >> >> >> > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On 11/24/2019 5:25 PM, "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." wrote: > >> >> >> >> > The Washington Post is a liberal/leftist/communist rag. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> *titter* > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> It's owned by a fucking billionaire capitalist, you moron. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > The terms 'left' and 'right' have deliberately been > > redefined. > >> >> >> > According to the 2019 definition, WaPo is leftist. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >> It's center-right. You'd like it. > >> >> > > >> >> >> -- > >> >> >> FNVWe Nadegda > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > You haven't the slightest clue. > >> > > >> > > >> >> ... says the snipping coward who hasn't the slightest clue. > >> > > >> > > >> >> FNVWe Nadegda > >> > > >> > > >> > LOL. You're such a contemptible little liar. Snipping is your MO, > > not > >> > mine. > > > > > >> Proof, kook? > >> -- > >> FNVWe Nadegda > > > > > > Sure. This thread (and the "nomination" branch). Can I be more > > specific? Yes, but you've already taught me that won't matter. So > > keep lying. > Translation: "I don't have any proof, but that won't stop me from blowing > smoke." > Par for the course from you. > <snicker> > -- > FNVWe Nadegda Actually, Nadegda, I've already graciously given you a basic outline of the truth, which you've chosen to disregard because your dogma* is your life. (And I'll tell you why that's so upon request.) BUT, my time is in high demand from industry and if you're willing to pay my consulting fee then yes, I'll take the time to lay everything out for you, with proof. (But I'm sure you don't earn even an eighth of what I earn, and so I won't be holding my breath.) *your dogma that's defined for you by the right wing establishment that owns you wannabe leftist imbeciles
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-28 02:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <qrna5t$dkv$11@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #118436 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 20:42:59 -0500, Ted wrote: > On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 23:39:46 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > melt! >> On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 17:47:42 -0500, Ted wrote: > > >> > On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 21:49:12 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >> > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, > snowflakes, >> > melt! >> >> On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 12:57:19 -0500, Ted wrote: >> > >> > >> >> > On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 02:04:07 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >> >> > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >> > snowflakes, >> >> > melt! >> >> >> On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:43:49 -0500, Ted wrote: >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> > On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 22:13:49 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >> >> >> > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> >> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >> >> > snowflakes, >> >> >> > melt! >> >> >> >> On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 10:43:33 -0500, Ted wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 06:14:22 +0200, kensi >> >> >> >> > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On 11/24/2019 5:25 PM, "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." wrote: >> >> >> >> >> > The Washington Post is a liberal/leftist/communist > rag. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> *titter* >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> It's owned by a fucking billionaire capitalist, you > moron. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > The terms 'left' and 'right' have deliberately been >> > redefined. >> >> >> >> > According to the 2019 definition, WaPo is leftist. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> It's center-right. You'd like it. >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> FNVWe Nadegda >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > You haven't the slightest clue. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> ... says the snipping coward who hasn't the slightest clue. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> FNVWe Nadegda >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > LOL. You're such a contemptible little liar. Snipping is your > MO, >> > not >> >> > mine. >> > >> > >> >> Proof, kook? >> >> -- >> >> FNVWe Nadegda >> > >> > >> > Sure. This thread (and the "nomination" branch). Can I be more >> > specific? Yes, but you've already taught me that won't matter. So >> > keep lying. > > >> Translation: "I don't have any proof, but that won't stop me from > blowing >> smoke." > > >> Par for the course from you. > > >> <snicker> > > >> -- >> FNVWe Nadegda > > > Actually, Nadegda, I've already graciously given you a basic outline > of the truth, which you've chosen to disregard because your dogma* is > your life. (And I'll tell you why that's so upon request.) BUT, my > time is in high demand from industry and if you're willing to pay my > consulting fee then yes, I'll take the time to lay everything out for > you, with proof. (But I'm sure you don't earn even an eighth of what > I earn, and so I won't be holding my breath.) > > *your dogma that's defined for you by the right wing establishment > that owns you wannabe leftist imbeciles Ridiculous puffery. But not very surprising coming from you. "My daddy makes more money than yours does!" is straight out of any 8-year-old's insult playbook. I'm just surprised you didn't resort to it sooner. <snicker> One small victory: I got you to spell my name correctly. Next step is getting you to publicly expose yourself as the white supremacist I'm sure you secretly are ... no, wait, I've also already done *that*, with your ridiculous bit of historical revisionism in that other thread. OK, I guess we skip straight to the "make you melt down big-time and then flounce" step. <snicker> -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Scooter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-27 19:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bbdute1tnpsbhmof2hgru250ffgs3gf62g@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #118438 |
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 02:07:58 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 20:42:59 -0500, Ted wrote: > >> On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 23:39:46 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! >>> On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 17:47:42 -0500, Ted wrote: >> >> >>> > On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 21:49:12 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>> > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >> snowflakes, >>> > melt! >>> >> On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 12:57:19 -0500, Ted wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> >> > On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 02:04:07 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>> >> > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>> > snowflakes, >>> >> > melt! >>> >> >> On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:43:49 -0500, Ted wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> >> > On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 22:13:49 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>> >> >> > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> >> >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>> >> > snowflakes, >>> >> >> > melt! >>> >> >> >> On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 10:43:33 -0500, Ted wrote: >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 06:14:22 +0200, kensi >>> >> >> >> > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> >> >> >> >> On 11/24/2019 5:25 PM, "Sir Hømer Hall, Esq." wrote: >>> >> >> >> >> > The Washington Post is a liberal/leftist/communist >> rag. >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> *titter* >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> It's owned by a fucking billionaire capitalist, you >> moron. >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > The terms 'left' and 'right' have deliberately been >>> > redefined. >>> >> >> >> > According to the 2019 definition, WaPo is leftist. >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> It's center-right. You'd like it. >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> -- >>> >> >> >> FNVWe Nadegda >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > You haven't the slightest clue. >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> >> ... says the snipping coward who hasn't the slightest clue. >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> >> FNVWe Nadegda >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > LOL. You're such a contemptible little liar. Snipping is your >> MO, >>> > not >>> >> > mine. >>> > >>> > >>> >> Proof, kook? >>> >> -- >>> >> FNVWe Nadegda >>> > >>> > >>> > Sure. This thread (and the "nomination" branch). Can I be more >>> > specific? Yes, but you've already taught me that won't matter. So >>> > keep lying. >> >> >>> Translation: "I don't have any proof, but that won't stop me from >> blowing >>> smoke." >> >> >>> Par for the course from you. >> >> >>> <snicker> >> >> >>> -- >>> FNVWe Nadegda >> >> >> Actually, Nadegda, I've already graciously given you a basic outline >> of the truth, which you've chosen to disregard because your dogma* is >> your life. (And I'll tell you why that's so upon request.) BUT, my >> time is in high demand from industry and if you're willing to pay my >> consulting fee then yes, I'll take the time to lay everything out for >> you, with proof. (But I'm sure you don't earn even an eighth of what >> I earn, and so I won't be holding my breath.) >> >> *your dogma that's defined for you by the right wing establishment >> that owns you wannabe leftist imbeciles > >Ridiculous puffery. But not very surprising coming from you. "My daddy >makes more money than yours does!" is straight out of any 8-year-old's >insult playbook. I'm just surprised you didn't resort to it sooner. > ><snicker> > >One small victory: I got you to spell my name correctly. Next step is >getting you to publicly expose yourself as the white supremacist I'm sure >you secretly are ... no, wait, I've also already done *that*, with your >ridiculous bit of historical revisionism in that other thread. OK, I guess >we skip straight to the "make you melt down big-time and then flounce" >step. > ><snicker> Ted smacked your ass good. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 23 [1] 2 3 … 23 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | edm.general
csiph-web