Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > de.sci.electronics > #228131

Re: MJ10012 von ISC Inchange Semiconductor Company Limited: Okay?

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From "horst.d.winzler" <horst.d.winzler@web.de>
Newsgroups de.sci.electronics
Subject Re: MJ10012 von ISC Inchange Semiconductor Company Limited: Okay?
Date Mon, 29 May 2017 11:20:15 +0200
Lines 21
Message-ID <ep27efFipcoU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <eotnimFi18mU1@mid.individual.net> <592BB46A.45C1AF89@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de> <oggo2r$vr$1@gwaiyur.mb-net.net>
Reply-To horst.d.winzler@web.de
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Trace individual.net /vDbLG0v8+S1yj46UP5BowedqyHuEihCFvbnDgBTO0uHfN0o3M
Cancel-Lock sha1:ju32Gwth7vsn+U27lVXQeruiCBs=
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1
In-Reply-To <oggo2r$vr$1@gwaiyur.mb-net.net>
Content-Language de-DE
Xref csiph.com de.sci.electronics:228131

Show key headers only | View raw

Am 29.05.2017 um 11:02 schrieb Bernd Mayer:
> Am 29.05.2017 um 07:40 schrieb Hans-Jürgen Schneider:
>> Reinhard Zwirner schrieb:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> ich suche für Ersatzbestückung (lin. Netzteil 400 V) Transistoren vom
>>> Typ MJ10012.
>>
>> Schnäppchenartikel beim Reichelt: BUX 48A STM.
> 
> Hallo,
> 
> die BUX48A sind allerdings keine Darlingtons. Die MJ10012 haben dazu 
> auch noch eine Rückwärtsdiode.

Es wäre, zumindest eine Überlegung wert, ob nicht ein diskret 
aufgebauter Darlington vorteilhafter wäre?

-- 
---hdw---

Back to de.sci.electronics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

MJ10012 von ISC Inchange Semiconductor Company Limited: Okay? Reinhard Zwirner <reinhard.zwirner@t-online.de> - 2017-05-27 18:25 +0200
  Re: MJ10012 von ISC Inchange Semiconductor Company Limited: Okay? Dieter Wiedmann <dieter.wiedmann@t-online.de> - 2017-05-27 19:33 +0200
    Re: MJ10012 von ISC Inchange Semiconductor Company Limited: Okay? Marcel Mueller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2017-05-27 19:51 +0200
    Re: MJ10012 von ISC Inchange Semiconductor Company Limited: Okay? Reinhard Zwirner <reinhard.zwirner@t-online.de> - 2017-05-27 23:18 +0200
      Re: MJ10012 von ISC Inchange Semiconductor Company Limited: Okay? Dieter Wiedmann <dieter.wiedmann@t-online.de> - 2017-05-27 23:36 +0200
  Re: MJ10012 von ISC Inchange Semiconductor Company Limited: Okay? Marcel Mueller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2017-05-27 19:45 +0200
    Re: MJ10012 von ISC Inchange Semiconductor Company Limited: Okay? Reinhard Zwirner <reinhard.zwirner@t-online.de> - 2017-05-28 15:07 +0200
      Re: MJ10012 von ISC Inchange Semiconductor Company Limited: Okay? Dieter Wiedmann <dieter.wiedmann@t-online.de> - 2017-05-28 15:34 +0200
      Re: MJ10012 von ISC Inchange Semiconductor Company Limited: Okay? "horst.d.winzler" <horst.d.winzler@web.de> - 2017-05-28 15:48 +0200
  Re: MJ10012 von ISC Inchange Semiconductor Company Limited: Okay? Hans-Jürgen Schneider <echo@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de> - 2017-05-29 07:40 +0200
    Re: MJ10012 von ISC Inchange Semiconductor Company Limited: Okay? Dieter Wiedmann <dieter.wiedmann@t-online.de> - 2017-05-29 09:06 +0200
    Re: MJ10012 von ISC Inchange Semiconductor Company Limited: Okay? Bernd Mayer <beam.bam.boom@knuut.de> - 2017-05-29 11:02 +0200
      Re: MJ10012 von ISC Inchange Semiconductor Company Limited: Okay? "horst.d.winzler" <horst.d.winzler@web.de> - 2017-05-29 11:20 +0200
        Re: MJ10012 von ISC Inchange Semiconductor Company Limited: Okay? Bernd Mayer <beam.bam.boom@knuut.de> - 2017-05-29 11:33 +0200

csiph-web