Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > de.sci.electronics > #212390

Re: 10 = 1 +1

From "horst-d.winzler" <horst.d.winzler@web.de>
Newsgroups de.sci.electronics
Subject Re: 10 = 1 +1
Date 2016-08-09 05:13 +0200
Message-ID <e0t01sF2lraU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <nnahug$ksj$1@news.albasani.net> <nkohpbl03urjtjqo1ln2gt4v49lejuscf6@4ax.com> <nniv4o$ets$1@news.albasani.net> <b9arpbpj5a8utc982jjk596pmpmacj50ii@4ax.com> <noamiv$jrr$2@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


Am 08.08.2016 um 21:29 schrieb Rolf Bombach:
> Peter B�sche schrieb:
>>
>> 10 = 1 + 1
>> binäre Addition
>
> Nein. Addition im Dualsystem. Binär bezieht sich auf
> die Symbolmenge. Die olle IBM 1620 hat z.B. in BCD
> gerechnet.
>

Danke, jetzt wird mir klar was mich gestört hat.

-- 
---hdw---

Back to de.sci.electronics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

10 = 1 +1 Peter Bösche <myself@domain.invalid> - 2016-07-27 07:09 +0200
  Re: 10 = 1 +1 gunther nanonüm <g-h-w@gmx.de> - 2016-07-27 16:53 +0200
    Re: 10 = 1 +1 Peter Bösche <myself@domain.invalid> - 2016-07-27 18:40 +0200
      Re: 10 = 1 +1 gunther nanonüm <g-h-w@gmx.de> - 2016-07-30 21:28 +0200
        Re: 10 = 1 +1 Peter Bösche <myself@domain.invalid> - 2016-07-31 09:37 +0200
          Re: 10 = 1 +1 Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2016-08-08 21:29 +0200
            Re: 10 = 1 +1 "horst-d.winzler" <horst.d.winzler@web.de> - 2016-08-09 05:13 +0200
              Re: 10 = 1 +1 Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2016-08-09 22:36 +0200
            Re: 10 = 1 +1 Sieghard Schicktanz <Sieghard.Schicktanz@SchS.de> - 2016-08-09 22:37 +0200
  Re: 10 = 1 +1 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-08-06 17:04 +0200
    Re: 10 = 1 +1 Markus Loch <M@rkusLo.ch> - 2016-08-08 09:19 +0200
  Re: 10 = 1 +1 "Lund-Nielsen, Jorgen" <jorgen.lund-nielsen@xyz123desy.de> - 2016-08-08 09:09 +0200
  Re: 10 = 1 +1 Andreas Weber <info@tech-chat.de> - 2016-08-08 10:20 +0200
    Re: 10 = 1 +1 Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2016-08-08 21:31 +0200
      Re: 10 = 1 +1 Andreas Weber <info@tech-chat.de> - 2016-08-10 09:55 +0200
  Re: 10 = 1 +1 "Chr. Maercker" <Zweistein@gmx-topmail.de> - 2016-08-09 09:35 +0200

csiph-web