Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #24185 > unrolled thread
| Started by | TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft@me.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-04-21 22:35 -0500 |
| Last post | 2012-04-23 10:56 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 56 — 23 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system
Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft@me.com> - 2012-04-21 22:35 -0500
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2012-04-22 05:27 +0000
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2012-04-21 22:58 -0700
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2012-04-23 08:31 +1200
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> - 2012-04-22 16:12 -0700
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done HelpfulHarry@BusyWorking.com (Helpful Harry) - 2012-04-22 17:57 +1200
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft@me.com> - 2012-04-22 07:51 -0500
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2012-04-23 08:31 +1200
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done HelpfulHarry@BusyWorking.com (Helpful Harry) - 2012-04-23 13:42 +1200
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2012-04-23 06:47 +1000
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done HelpfulHarry@BusyWorking.com (Helpful Harry) - 2012-04-23 13:32 +1200
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2012-04-23 13:30 +1000
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-04-22 12:19 -0400
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2012-04-23 06:50 +1000
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done HelpfulHarry@BusyWorking.com (Helpful Harry) - 2012-04-23 13:39 +1200
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> - 2012-04-22 16:21 -0700
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done HelpfulHarry@BusyWorking.com (Helpful Harry) - 2012-04-23 13:47 +1200
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> - 2012-04-22 18:58 -0700
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done HelpfulHarry@BusyWorking.com (Helpful Harry) - 2012-04-23 18:48 +1200
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2012-04-23 18:38 +1200
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done Michelle <michelle@michelle.org> - 2012-04-22 18:21 +0000
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done Koralatov <usenet@koralatov.com> - 2012-04-22 23:24 +0000
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done Paul Sture <paul@sture.ch> - 2012-04-23 16:26 +0200
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done Sara <saramerriman@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2012-04-23 15:52 +0100
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2012-04-24 07:32 +1200
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done Paul Sture <paul@sture.ch> - 2012-04-24 11:18 +0200
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> - 2012-04-26 00:47 -0400
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done HelpfulHarry@BusyWorking.com (Helpful Harry) - 2012-04-26 18:59 +1200
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> - 2012-04-26 19:14 -0400
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done Paul Sture <paul@sture.ch> - 2012-04-26 11:20 +0200
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2012-04-26 20:24 +1000
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done Invid Fan <invid@loclanet.com> - 2012-04-22 14:44 -0400
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done nospam@see.signature (Richard Maine) - 2012-04-22 13:17 -0700
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2012-04-23 06:55 +1000
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-04-22 17:42 -0400
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done Invid Fan <invid@loclanet.com> - 2012-04-22 20:26 -0400
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done Ed Anson <EdAnson@comcast.net> - 2012-04-22 21:48 -0400
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> - 2012-04-22 18:59 -0700
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2012-04-22 18:23 -0400
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done Koralatov <usenet@koralatov.com> - 2012-04-22 23:22 +0000
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2012-04-23 16:43 -0600
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> - 2012-04-26 00:54 -0400
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done HelpfulHarry@BusyWorking.com (Helpful Harry) - 2012-04-26 18:51 +1200
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2012-04-26 06:59 -0400
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done HelpfulHarry@BusyWorking.com (Helpful Harry) - 2012-04-27 09:31 +1200
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2012-04-26 21:37 -0400
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done nospam@see.signature (Richard Maine) - 2012-04-26 18:47 -0700
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2012-04-27 21:26 +1000
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done David Spencer <spencer@panix.com> - 2012-04-27 14:08 +0000
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2012-04-27 15:26 +0100
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2012-04-27 16:12 -0400
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done russotto@grace.speakeasy.net (Matthew Russotto) - 2012-05-08 03:25 +0000
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done Paul Sture <paul@sture.ch> - 2012-04-26 11:24 +0200
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2012-04-23 08:31 +1200
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done Koralatov <usenet@koralatov.com> - 2012-04-22 23:28 +0000
Re: Backing Up - Why So Often Not Done jdear64 <jdear64@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-23 10:56 -0700
Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →
| From | Michelle <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-22 18:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1864496730356804412.540856michelle-michelle.org@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #24185 |
TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft@me.com> wrote: > I recently spent some time with a person who although a Mac user for > about 20 years had never performed a backup of his system but finally > decided to do so. His thought was to do a backup once a month but I > convinced him to do one late each evening. I had him install SuperDuper! > to backup to a newly purchased external hard drive. The choice of > SuperDuper! over other alternatives was simply that it is the one with > which I am most familiar. Everything is now running fine. > > This incident was by no means the first time I have helped a person set > up a backup routine. My curiosity is what is it that seems to make people > not realize the importance of regular backups? I had a customer back in the late 80s who never saved a file on his apple //c. He used only AppleWorks and printed each document after finishing it. -- Michelle -- Sent from my iPad
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Koralatov <usenet@koralatov.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-22 23:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <jn2403$97h$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #24203 |
On 2012-04-22, Michelle <michelle@michelle.org> wrote:
> I had a customer back in the late 80s who never saved a file on his
> apple //c. He used only AppleWorks and printed each document after
> finishing it.
Well, that takes care of the bit-rot/demagnetisation problem, but did
they take an off-site backup of the hardcopies? :P
--
Mike | <http://koralatov.com>
"A camel is a horse designed
by a committee." -- Larry Wall
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Sture <paul@sture.ch> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-23 16:26 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <fd5g69-epd.ln1@news.sture.ch> |
| In reply to | #24203 |
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 18:21:07 +0000, Michelle wrote: > I had a customer back in the late 80s who never saved a file on his > apple //c. He used only AppleWorks and printed each document after > finishing it. I had a boss like that in the early 90s. After printing he either deleted his computer copy or edited it for his next document. He didn't see the need for any backups except for his accounting software. -- Paul Sture
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sara <saramerriman@blueyonder.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-23 15:52 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <saramerriman-F3F215.15520023042012@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #24256 |
In article <fd5g69-epd.ln1@news.sture.ch>, Paul Sture <paul@sture.ch> wrote: > On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 18:21:07 +0000, Michelle wrote: > > > I had a customer back in the late 80s who never saved a file on his > > apple //c. He used only AppleWorks and printed each document after > > finishing it. > > I had a boss like that in the early 90s. After printing he either > deleted his computer copy or edited it for his next document. > > He didn't see the need for any backups except for his accounting software. I worked at a place once where a bloke got very antsy when he saw someone faxing a document that hadn't been copied yet :) -- Sara Peeps squeaks, Billy is silly and as for Armageddon...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-24 07:32 +1200 |
| Message-ID | <1kj1orc.1w5jfhvstjzcmN%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> |
| In reply to | #24257 |
Sara <saramerriman@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > In article <fd5g69-epd.ln1@news.sture.ch>, Paul Sture <paul@sture.ch> > wrote: > > > On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 18:21:07 +0000, Michelle wrote: > > > > > I had a customer back in the late 80s who never saved a file on his > > > apple //c. He used only AppleWorks and printed each document after > > > finishing it. > > > > I had a boss like that in the early 90s. After printing he either > > deleted his computer copy or edited it for his next document. > > > > He didn't see the need for any backups except for his accounting software. > > I worked at a place once where a bloke got very antsy when he saw > someone faxing a document that hadn't been copied yet :) A family member once came home from work and exclaimed that their fax machine had stopped working, and they had to call the help desk who came around to discover it was simply out of paper, and did I realise that faxes needed paper??? I think they'd thought the paper somehow magically came through the phone line or something :-D -- If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Sture <paul@sture.ch> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-24 11:18 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tn7i69-ldk.ln1@news.sture.ch> |
| In reply to | #24269 |
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 07:32:06 +1200, Jamie Kahn Genet wrote: > Sara <saramerriman@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > >> In article <fd5g69-epd.ln1@news.sture.ch>, Paul Sture <paul@sture.ch> >> wrote: >> >> > On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 18:21:07 +0000, Michelle wrote: >> > >> > > I had a customer back in the late 80s who never saved a file on his >> > > apple //c. He used only AppleWorks and printed each document >> > > after finishing it. >> > >> > I had a boss like that in the early 90s. After printing he either >> > deleted his computer copy or edited it for his next document. >> > >> > He didn't see the need for any backups except for his accounting >> > software. >> >> I worked at a place once where a bloke got very antsy when he saw >> someone faxing a document that hadn't been copied yet :) > > A family member once came home from work and exclaimed that their fax > machine had stopped working, and they had to call the help desk who came > around to discover it was simply out of paper, and did I realise that > faxes needed paper??? > > I think they'd thought the paper somehow magically came through the > phone line or something :-D I recall a tale about a musician (Stefan Grapelli?) who, as some artists are, was completely clueless about cars. He was persuaded to buy one and when it ran out of fuel thought that "Well it was fun, but it didn't last very long". He didn't realise he had to fill the thing up. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St%C3%A9phane_Grappelli> A very distinctive sound. IIRC he had a regular spot on a BBC radio chat morning chat show when I was young; he and a few others would basically have a jam sessionn at intervals throughout the show. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Pb-1XGUkNM&feature=related> I recall Diz Disley from those BBC shows too. -- Paul Sture
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-26 00:47 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <jnak17$dvd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #24257 |
On 04-23-2012 10:52, Sara wrote:
> I worked at a place once where a bloke got very antsy when he saw
> someone faxing a document that hadn't been copied yet :)
I once saw let someone with an extremely urgent job go ahead of me on
the copier. He slapped a sheet on the glass, made one copy, and then
tossed the original into the trash bin.
--
Wes Groleau
“Isn't embarrassing to quote something you didn't read
and then attack what it didn't say?”
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HelpfulHarry@BusyWorking.com (Helpful Harry) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-26 18:59 +1200 |
| Message-ID | <HelpfulHarry-2604121859580001@203-118-187-174.dsl.dyn.ihug.co.nz> |
| In reply to | #24400 |
In article <jnak17$dvd$1@dont-email.me>, none.of@your.biz wrote: > On 04-23-2012 10:52, Sara wrote: > > > > I worked at a place once where a bloke got very antsy when he saw > > someone faxing a document that hadn't been copied yet :) Given the number of times I seen a fax machine or photocopier feeder chew up a document, he probably wasn't too wrong being worried about it. :o) > I once saw let someone with an extremely urgent job go ahead of me on > the copier. He slapped a sheet on the glass, made one copy, and then > tossed the original into the trash bin. One possibility: Perhaps parts of the document had been "corrected" or "censored" and he wanted a copy so it was more difficult to see the "correction" or 'uncensor' it. (Maybe he had increased your salary on the document and was going to keep the difference. ;o)) In the old days you could use a dark highlighter (blue or green) to censor documents since the highlighted parts would not photocopy. These days highlighters are designed to be photocopied / scanned. Helpful Harry :o)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-26 19:14 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <jnckt3$l7l$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #24404 |
On 04-26-2012 02:59, Helpful Harry wrote: >> > I once saw let someone with an extremely urgent job go ahead of me on >> > the copier. He slapped a sheet on the glass, made one copy, and then >> > tossed the original into the trash bin. > One possibility: Perhaps parts of the document had been "corrected" or > "censored" and he wanted a copy so it was more difficult to see the > "correction" or 'uncensor' it. (Maybe he had increased your salary on the > document and was going to keep the difference. ;o)) Possible, but if he had something to hide, he left the evidence right next to the copier. This was the same guy who, if I was sick on a workday (Naval Reserve) made me drive out to the station so that he could hand me a paper directing me to drive to the V.A. medical center near my house. Where they told me to wait in a room that had a football game on TV. At half-time, someone come out and asked me a few questions and told me to wait for the doctor. When the game was over, a doctor came out and told me to go home and rest. -- Wes Groleau Change is inevitable. We need to learn that “inevitable" is neither a synonym for “good" nor for “bad.”
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Sture <paul@sture.ch> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-26 11:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <gjgn69-164.ln1@news.sture.ch> |
| In reply to | #24400 |
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 00:47:34 -0400, Wes Groleau wrote: > On 04-23-2012 10:52, Sara wrote: >> I worked at a place once where a bloke got very antsy when he saw >> someone faxing a document that hadn't been copied yet :) > > I once saw let someone with an extremely urgent job go ahead of me on > the copier. He slapped a sheet on the glass, made one copy, and then > tossed the original into the trash bin. I've lost count of the number of times I've found originals still in a photocopier. Personal stuff too, and a colleague once rang me, having already left work for the day, asking me to retrieve his CV from the photocopier so the boss didn't see it :-) -- Paul Sture
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-26 20:24 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <dorayme-343A1B.20244726042012@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #24406 |
In article <gjgn69-164.ln1@news.sture.ch>, Paul Sture <paul@sture.ch> wrote: > On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 00:47:34 -0400, Wes Groleau wrote: > > > On 04-23-2012 10:52, Sara wrote: > >> I worked at a place once where a bloke got very antsy when he saw > >> someone faxing a document that hadn't been copied yet :) > > > > I once saw let someone with an extremely urgent job go ahead of me on > > the copier. He slapped a sheet on the glass, made one copy, and then > > tossed the original into the trash bin. > > I've lost count of the number of times I've found originals still in a > photocopier. Personal stuff too, and a colleague once rang me, having > already left work for the day, asking me to retrieve his CV from the > photocopier so the boss didn't see it :-) Why, I have found hands, feet, once a buttock even, left behind. Pretty gruesome actually. -- dorayme
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Invid Fan <invid@loclanet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-22 14:44 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <220420121444223654%invid@loclanet.com> |
| In reply to | #24185 |
In article <9vhcjmFs7eU1@mid.individual.net>, TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft@me.com> wrote: > This incident was by no means the first time I have helped a person set > up a backup routine. My curiosity is what is it that seems to make > people not realize the importance of regular backups? In the end, for many of us what's on the computer is disposable. Seriously, there's nothing that can't just be reinstalled, no data that I REALLY can't do without. I do have a Time Machine backup drive now, but before that would just occasionally drag my iTunes library onto an extra drive if I happened to have one. I don't bother "backing up" anything else in my life, so don't really see the need with the computer. -- Chris Mack "If we show any weakness, the monsters will get cocky!" 'Invid Fan' - 'Yokai Monsters Along With Ghosts'
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@see.signature (Richard Maine) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-22 13:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1kiyewc.1ytil121y7dgqwN%nospam@see.signature> |
| In reply to | #24204 |
Invid Fan <invid@loclanet.com> wrote: > In article <9vhcjmFs7eU1@mid.individual.net>, TaliesinSoft > <taliesinsoft@me.com> wrote: > > > This incident was by no means the first time I have helped a person set > > up a backup routine. My curiosity is what is it that seems to make > > people not realize the importance of regular backups? > > In the end, for many of us what's on the computer is disposable. Maybe for you. Maybe for many others as well. Certainly not for me. And, alas, also not for many of the people who don't do backups. I know this because I've been in the position of helping plenty of them out as a result, both in my personal and professional life. Sometimes it has even been people who claimed, as you mention above, that there was nothing on their computer that needed backing up.... until the after the crash actually happened. I've helped enough people who were in that position that I've come to take the "disposable" argument with a rather large grain of salt. Most often, though, it has just been people who never thought about it at all, or if they did, just figured that "it wouldn't happen to them". A few times it has been people who thought they had backups, but turned out not to have useable ones for one reason or other (insert here rant about some incompetent sysadmins). One time it was a fellow NASA employee who explained that the data on the crashed system was worth about $100k and that the contractor responsable for the system had been contractually obligated to back it up, but... guess that was one of the corners that got cut in terms of actually doing what the contract required. I recommended he seek professional data recovery services for the head-crashed disk drive. He didn't know about such services existing. I believe they did get the data off as a result, but those services aren't cheap and they don't guarantee always suceeding. -- Richard Maine | Good judgment comes from experience; email: last name at domain . net | experience comes from bad judgment. domain: summertriangle | -- Mark Twain
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-23 06:55 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <dorayme-20FBAF.06550323042012@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #24204 |
In article <220420121444223654%invid@loclanet.com>, Invid Fan <invid@loclanet.com> wrote: > In the end, for many of us what's on the computer is disposable. In the end, everything is disposable. When one of the assassins was being remorseful in Unforgiven about having killed his target and added something like "But he had it coming!", Clint Eastwood stood staring darkly into the distance and replied, "We all have it coming, kid." -- dorayme
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-22 17:42 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <OK6dnTU6AJGx5gnSnZ2dnUVZ_jKdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #24204 |
On 2012-04-22 14:44 , Invid Fan wrote:
> In article<9vhcjmFs7eU1@mid.individual.net>, TaliesinSoft
> <taliesinsoft@me.com> wrote:
>
>> This incident was by no means the first time I have helped a person set
>> up a backup routine. My curiosity is what is it that seems to make
>> people not realize the importance of regular backups?
>
> In the end, for many of us what's on the computer is disposable.
> Seriously, there's nothing that can't just be reinstalled, no data that
> I REALLY can't do without. I do have a Time Machine backup drive now,
I have many 10's of thousands of photos (that I've taken). Many film
(laboriously scanned). They have to be backed up or it's a lot of work
to recover.
Many "living" documents on my computer (financial, project).
Programs I've written.
etc...
> but before that would just occasionally drag my iTunes library onto an
> extra drive if I happened to have one. I don't bother "backing up"
> anything else in my life, so don't really see the need with the
> computer.
It depends on the nature of the data and what you use/need the computer for.
--
"I was gratified to be able to answer promptly, and I did.
I said I didn't know."
-Samuel Clemens.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Invid Fan <invid@loclanet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-22 20:26 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <220420122026104153%invid@loclanet.com> |
| In reply to | #24215 |
In article <OK6dnTU6AJGx5gnSnZ2dnUVZ_jKdnZ2d@giganews.com>, Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote: > On 2012-04-22 14:44 , Invid Fan wrote: > > In article<9vhcjmFs7eU1@mid.individual.net>, TaliesinSoft > > <taliesinsoft@me.com> wrote: > > > >> This incident was by no means the first time I have helped a person set > >> up a backup routine. My curiosity is what is it that seems to make > >> people not realize the importance of regular backups? > > > > In the end, for many of us what's on the computer is disposable. > > Seriously, there's nothing that can't just be reinstalled, no data that > > I REALLY can't do without. I do have a Time Machine backup drive now, > > I have many 10's of thousands of photos (that I've taken). Many film > (laboriously scanned). They have to be backed up or it's a lot of work > to recover. > Yes, but do you back up your REAL photos as well? Those aren't as easy to have destroyed, obviously, but I have no backup if the photo albums are under a leaky roof or damaged in afire. > Many "living" documents on my computer (financial, project). > > Programs I've written. > Obviously, you use your computer for things that, in the real world, would need backups even if they weren't done on the computer. > > but before that would just occasionally drag my iTunes library onto an > > extra drive if I happened to have one. I don't bother "backing up" > > anything else in my life, so don't really see the need with the > > computer. > > It depends on the nature of the data and what you use/need the computer for. Exactly. I'm just suggesting that for many, this is why they don't backup anything. -- Chris Mack "If we show any weakness, the monsters will get cocky!" 'Invid Fan' - 'Yokai Monsters Along With Ghosts'
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ed Anson <EdAnson@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-22 21:48 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <LeGdnXKIWa9AKQnSnZ2dnUVZ_qSdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #24223 |
On 4/22/12 8:26 PM, Invid Fan wrote: > Yes, but do you back up your REAL photos as well? Those aren't as easy > to have destroyed, obviously, but I have no backup if the photo albums > are under a leaky roof or damaged in afire. That's a good point. About six years ago, my family lost decades worth of irreplaceable photographs in a flood. > Obviously, you use your computer for things that, in the real world, > would need backups even if they weren't done on the computer. I have since started digitizing my most important records, including photographs -- even if they aren't originally digital. Because I back up my disks regularly, I am confident that my records are much more secure on disk than anywhere else.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-22 18:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <jn2d1s$ibm$2@reader1.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #24230 |
On 2012-04-23 01:48:10 +0000, Ed Anson said: > On 4/22/12 8:26 PM, Invid Fan wrote: >> Yes, but do you back up your REAL photos as well? Those aren't as easy >> to have destroyed, obviously, but I have no backup if the photo albums >> are under a leaky roof or damaged in afire. > > That's a good point. About six years ago, my family lost decades worth > of irreplaceable photographs in a flood. One of the reasons I've been slowly but surely scanning in all the family photos and converting the old family movies. It's *vastly* easier to back up digital copies than the older formats.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Davoud <star@sky.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-22 18:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <220420121823100127%star@sky.net> |
| In reply to | #24204 |
Invid Fan: > In the end, for many of us what's on the computer is disposable. > Seriously, there's nothing that can't just be reinstalled, no data that > I REALLY can't do without. I do have a Time Machine backup drive now, > but before that would just occasionally drag my iTunes library onto an > extra drive if I happened to have one. I don't bother "backing up" > anything else in my life, so don't really see the need with the > computer. If that works for you, don't let anyone tell you you're wrong. It wouldn't work for me because I have photographs that are financially or artistically valuable; writings that are financially or artistically important. Astronomical research that I would not wish to re-do from scratch. Other photos and writings that are personally valuable. Family documents going back 200 years that I enjoy looking at from time to time, but the originals of which I store in a fireproof bank vault. I have financial records that could be reconstructed only with the expenditure of much time (= money). One-of-a-kind audio and video recordings that could not be reproduced at any price. And so on. -- I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that you will say in your entire life. usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Koralatov <usenet@koralatov.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-04-22 23:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <jn23s5$97h$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #24204 |
On 2012-04-22, Invid Fan <invid@loclanet.com> wrote:
> In article <9vhcjmFs7eU1@mid.individual.net>, TaliesinSoft
><taliesinsoft@me.com> wrote:
>
> In the end, for many of us what's on the computer is disposable.
> Seriously, there's nothing that can't just be reinstalled, no data
> that I REALLY can't do without.
You're right in a "life-and-death-we-need-it-to-survive" way, but we've
moved so heavily onto computers that a lot of our really important stuff
is on there. The most obvious example of that is photos. Apart from
the handful of Instaxes I take every so often, *every* photo I've taken
in the last 5+ years has been digital. Every single one. I know people
who have countless photos of weddings, babies, deceased family members
that are digital and not backed up beyond the occasional hardcopy print.
That stuff isn't "essential" in a survival sense, but that stuff is
priceless to them, and they would be devastated if they lost it. *That*
is why I find it absolutely incredible that people don't back up
properly as a matter of course.
--
Mike | <http://koralatov.com>
"A camel is a horse designed
by a committee." -- Larry Wall
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system
csiph-web