Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #58036 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Davoud <star@sky.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-03-21 18:23 -0400 |
| Last post | 2014-03-23 14:34 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 71 — 23 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system
Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2014-03-21 18:23 -0400
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-03-22 10:19 +1100
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away ErikRS <mac-dane@is.invalid> - 2014-03-22 00:45 +0100
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-21 23:55 +0000
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2014-03-21 20:04 -0400
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-03-21 20:53 -0400
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2014-03-21 21:19 -0400
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-22 01:35 +0000
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-03-22 07:58 -0400
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-22 01:22 +0000
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2014-03-22 19:29 +0000
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2014-03-23 10:38 -0400
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-03-23 08:12 -0700
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-23 15:19 +0000
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-03-23 08:46 -0700
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-23 15:16 +0000
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-03-23 21:23 +0000
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2014-03-23 23:00 -0400
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-24 22:58 +0000
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-03-24 22:52 +0000
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-03-23 21:21 +0000
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> - 2014-03-24 19:09 -0700
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-25 13:11 +0000
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-03-31 15:58 -0400
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-04-01 13:01 +0000
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> - 2014-04-02 18:34 -0700
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-03-25 10:29 -0400
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-03-25 13:52 -0400
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-03-25 14:00 -0400
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-03-25 14:53 -0400
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-03-26 08:14 +1200
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-03-25 19:01 -0400
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-03-26 08:22 -0400
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2014-03-26 09:13 -0400
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-03-26 09:36 -0400
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2014-03-26 16:02 -0700
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> - 2014-03-27 04:58 -0500
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-03-27 08:52 -0400
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-03-28 08:00 +1100
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> - 2014-03-27 13:12 -0800
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-28 06:10 +0000
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-03-28 16:51 -0400
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2014-03-30 17:58 -0400
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-03-27 17:28 -0400
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2014-03-27 17:48 -0400
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-03-27 20:01 -0400
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-03-27 20:14 -0400
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away John White <jccw@comcast.net> - 2014-03-27 23:34 -0400
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-03-27 21:15 -0700
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-03-28 16:49 -0400
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-03-28 08:51 +1200
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-03-31 15:58 -0400
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft@me.com> - 2014-03-31 21:53 -0500
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-04-01 16:15 +1200
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-03-31 23:16 -0400
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft@me.com> - 2014-03-31 22:36 -0500
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-04-01 18:25 +1200
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> - 2014-04-02 18:30 -0700
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-03-31 15:58 -0400
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2014-03-22 13:43 +1200
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> - 2014-03-22 10:51 +1100
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-21 16:54 -0700
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2014-03-21 20:07 -0400
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Mandy Liefbowitz <mandyliefbowitz@the.port.side> - 2014-03-22 00:39 +0000
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2014-03-21 21:22 -0400
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-03-22 14:18 +0000
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away ErikRS <mac-dane@is.invalid> - 2014-03-22 02:44 +0100
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2014-03-21 21:35 -0700
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> - 2014-03-22 16:53 -0700
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2014-03-22 20:54 -0700
Re: Free PowerMac If You Can Carry It Away Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-23 14:34 +0000
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-28 06:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnlja4j2.8b8.g.kreme@amelia.local> |
| In reply to | #58168 |
In message <c138i3ibwm.fsf@ethel.the.log> Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovethis@gmail.com> wrote: > dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> writes: >> In article <53341f00$0$32752$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com>, >> Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Ontario moves in a sluggish manner. You can't even buy beer in the >> > grocery stores here, you have to go to the "Beer Store" which is owned >> > believe-it-or-don't by some fucking eurotrash consortium >> >> Yeah, well, ... they make (or at least did make) the best beer in the >> world over in Europe. > As may be, but Ontario's "Beer Store" is owned by Molson/Coors and > Anhueser-Busch. > These are both huge companies. It is possible that one or both of > them accidentally make some good beer, though I doubt either makes the > best beer in the world. > (Michelob Pumpkin Spice Ale, anyone? Bud Light Lime? Coors Light Iced > T? yum.) I hate to admit it, but Bud Lite Lime is actually very good. It doesn't taste like beer, but it tastes really good. I refuse to buy it on general principle, or anything made by Coors, though I do take every opportunity to stop along the banks of Clear Creek and pee in it. -- Disorder is merely the order you were not looking for." Henri Bergson
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-28 16:51 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <y7SdnQGc9MYhfajOnZ2dnUVZ_umdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #58182 |
On 2014.03.28, 02:10 , Lewis wrote:
> I refuse to buy it on general principle, or anything made by Coors,
> though I do take every opportunity to stop along the banks of Clear
> Creek and pee in it.
Coors is like making love in canoe.
--
... it may be that "in the cloud" really isn't the best term
for the services these companies offer. What they really
want is to have us "on the leash."
-David Pogue, Scientific American, 2014.02
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-30 17:58 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <proto-AED0B9.17583030032014@news.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #58182 |
In article <slrnlja4j2.8b8.g.kreme@amelia.local>, Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote: > I refuse to buy it on general principle, or anything made by Coors, > though I do take every opportunity to stop along the banks of Clear > Creek and pee in it. Isn't that a lot of trouble just to improve the taste of Coors? -- Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greed. Me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-27 17:28 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <QKKdnSu7gfOcBanOnZ2dnUVZ_sKdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #58159 |
On 2014.03.27, 08:52 , Warren Oates wrote:
> In article <super70s-01B2F4.04584127032014@bonxibon.datemas.de>,
> super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
>
>> In article <5332c66e$0$32701$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com>,
>> Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Anyway, > our yearly registration stickers go on the back plate, so we
>> can't > really do that (well, I could, I suppose, as long as I didn't
>> do it more > than once't a year, but I guess I'm not that anal).
>>
>> Front plates are kind of a dumb idea really both practically and
>> economically, my state hasn't required them for several decades.
>
> Ontario moves in a sluggish manner.
Yeah. Annual stickers. Really?
Another smart time saver in Quebec is that the photo for your driver's
license and for your prov. medical ins. is taken at the SAAQ (the
"DMV"). So one visit there every 4 years and they re-issue new cards
good for 4 years for both. (Of course you also have to send in about
$80 per year for the driver's license - the large part of that being
no-fault insurance ...)
(This sounds like merely efficient administration but a special law had
to be passed to allow the two departments to communicate even the most
superficial personal data).
--
Those who have reduced our privacy, whether they are state
or commercial actors, prefer that we do not reduce theirs.
- Jaron Lanier, Scientific American, 2013.11.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Davoud <star@sky.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-27 17:48 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <270320141748222023%star@sky.net> |
| In reply to | #58159 |
Warren Oates: > Ontario moves in a sluggish manner. You can't even buy beer in the > grocery stores here, you have to go to the "Beer Store" which is owned > believe-it-or-don't by some fucking eurotrash consortium in Belgium or > some such godfersaken eurotrash country. They also own the toll freeway > across northern Toronto. It's the way of the world. The Washington, DC subway system, "The Metro," is operated by a Canadian company. United Statesians take this to be further evidence that we no longer know how to run a railroad. As for alcohol, our 50 states and various territories all have their own laws. In Pennsylvania, for example, one may only buy wine and spirits from the "State Store," which is state-owned. Beer may only be purchased from a "beer distributor." In Maryland, all alcoholic beverages are sold only in liquor stores. In Iowa, where 99.999% of the population are staid, upright Methodists*, one may buy distilled spirits at petrol stations. I'm not entirely certain that that is a good thing. *Hyperbole. -- I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that you will say in your entire life. usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-27 20:01 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <5334bbf0$0$49632$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #58173 |
In article <270320141748222023%star@sky.net>, Davoud <star@sky.net> wrote: > Warren Oates: > > Ontario moves in a sluggish manner. You can't even buy beer in the > > grocery stores here, you have to go to the "Beer Store" which is owned > > believe-it-or-don't by some fucking eurotrash consortium in Belgium or > > some such godfersaken eurotrash country. They also own the toll freeway > > across northern Toronto. > > It's the way of the world. The Washington, DC subway system, "The > Metro," is operated by a Canadian company. United Statesians take this > to be further evidence that we no longer know how to run a railroad. > > As for alcohol, our 50 states and various territories all have their > own laws. In Pennsylvania, for example, one may only buy wine and > spirits from the "State Store," which is state-owned. Beer may only be > purchased from a "beer distributor." In Maryland, all alcoholic > beverages are sold only in liquor stores. In Iowa, where 99.999% of the > population are staid, upright Methodists*, one may buy distilled > spirits at petrol stations. I'm not entirely certain that that is a > good thing. > > *Hyperbole. The difference between the "state stores" and the equivalent in Canada is that in Canada, the government controls the pricing. I shopped at state stores in Maine and Vermont, and the while the states run the stores, the prices are set and controlled by the distillers. I used to get a pretty good nouveau beaujolais at the gas station in Richford Vt. -- Where's the Vangelis music? Pris' tongue is sticking out in in the wide shot after Batty has kissed her. They have put back more tits into the Zhora dressing room scene. -- notes for Blade Runner
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-27 20:14 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <EuWdnVwV9PNuI6nOnZ2dnUVZ_uudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #58175 |
On 2014.03.27, 20:01 , Warren Oates wrote:
> In article <270320141748222023%star@sky.net>, Davoud <star@sky.net> wrote:
>
>> Warren Oates:
>> > Ontario moves in a sluggish manner. You can't even buy beer in the >
>> grocery stores here, you have to go to the "Beer Store" which is owned
>> > believe-it-or-don't by some fucking eurotrash consortium in Belgium
>> or > some such godfersaken eurotrash country. They also own the toll
>> freeway > across northern Toronto.
>>
>> It's the way of the world. The Washington, DC subway system, "The
>> Metro," is operated by a Canadian company. United Statesians take this
>> to be further evidence that we no longer know how to run a railroad.
>>
>> As for alcohol, our 50 states and various territories all have their
>> own laws. In Pennsylvania, for example, one may only buy wine and
>> spirits from the "State Store," which is state-owned. Beer may only be
>> purchased from a "beer distributor." In Maryland, all alcoholic
>> beverages are sold only in liquor stores.
I've bought over the counter beer in MD at a store adjoining a bar.
Separate section with its own employee, fridges and cash register.
Perhaps you're allowed to carry unopened bottles from bars there and
that's how they manage it.
> The difference between the "state stores" and the equivalent in Canada
> is that in Canada, the government controls the pricing.
Beer in Quebec is more competitive than most provinces because it's sold
in convenience and grocery stores. So it's often on sale at just above
the "legal minimum". I've seen Sleeman small cases (12) as low as
$11.71 (and bought a pile when I saw it). Usually I can buy it for
$12.99 - $13.99, so I'll pick up 4 cases when it's in that range.
Wine is more expensive in Quebec because the SAQ executives receive
their bonus based on sales figures. So they have no incentive to pass
on savings from good deals they may make in overseas markets. We drive
to Hawkesbury and buy 4 or 5 cases of wine ever once in a while. (It's
technically illegal to do so...)
750 ml of fricken Bowmore 12 is now at $58.00 in Quebec.
--
Those who have reduced our privacy, whether they are state
or commercial actors, prefer that we do not reduce theirs.
- Jaron Lanier, Scientific American, 2013.11.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John White <jccw@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-27 23:34 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <jccw-DE8F8D.23340127032014@mx05.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #58175 |
In article <5334bbf0$0$49632$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com>, Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> wrote: > > The difference between the "state stores" and the equivalent in Canada > is that in Canada, the government controls the pricing. I shopped at > state stores in Maine and Vermont, and the while the states run the > stores, the prices are set and controlled by the distillers. I used to > get a pretty good nouveau beaujolais at the gas station in Richford Vt. In Virginia, distilled spirits are sold only in state stores, which control the prices (and everything else).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-27 21:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <270320142115103486%michelle@michelle.org> |
| In reply to | #58178 |
In article <jccw-DE8F8D.23340127032014@mx05.eternal-september.org>, John White <jccw@comcast.net> wrote: > In article <5334bbf0$0$49632$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com>, > Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > The difference between the "state stores" and the equivalent in Canada > > is that in Canada, the government controls the pricing. I shopped at > > state stores in Maine and Vermont, and the while the states run the > > stores, the prices are set and controlled by the distillers. I used to > > get a pretty good nouveau beaujolais at the gas station in Richford Vt. > > In Virginia, distilled spirits are sold only in state stores, which > control the prices (and everything else). When I was in my mid 20s, I bought some booze at a state ABC store in Arlington; they didn't ask for ID. Then I went next door to a drug store and bought a six-pack of beer. The teenage cashier asked for ID.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-28 16:49 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <y7SdnQac9MbpfajOnZ2dnUVZ_umdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #58180 |
On 2014.03.28, 00:15 , Michelle Steiner wrote:
> When I was in my mid 20s, I bought some booze at a state ABC store in
> Arlington; they didn't ask for ID. Then I went next door to a drug
> store and bought a six-pack of beer. The teenage cashier asked for ID.
I was in some state along the US eastern seaboard where when I bought
beer (in a grocery store) the teenage cashier had to get someone over 21
to pass the beer over the scanner.
--
Privacy has become an essential personal chore that most
people are not trained to perform.
- Jaron Lanier, Scientific American, 2013.11.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-28 08:51 +1200 |
| Message-ID | <280320140851490606%YourName@YourISP.com> |
| In reply to | #58156 |
In article <super70s-01B2F4.04584127032014@bonxibon.datemas.de>, super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote: > In article <5332c66e$0$32701$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com>, > Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> wrote: > > In article <S4-dnQQI3dF_l6_OnZ2dnUVZ_qednZ2d@giganews.com>, > > Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote: > > > On 2014.03.25, 16:14 , Your Name wrote: > > > > > > > flat / cross head screwdriver). It's also a bit of a pain for people > > > > like me who sawp the front and back plates every so often to even out > > > > the road wear that occurs, > > > > > > Do I really understand that you change the plates fore and aft because > > > the front plate begins showing wear? > > > > I was wondering about that. Maybe he lives in the Sahara desert. Anyway, > > our yearly registration stickers go on the back plate, so we can't > > really do that (well, I could, I suppose, as long as I didn't do it more > > than once't a year, but I guess I'm not that anal). > > Front plates are kind of a dumb idea really both practically and > economically, my state hasn't required them for several decades. So all the criminals just drive in reverse gear so they can't be identified. ;-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-31 15:58 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <310320141558128692%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #58156 |
In article <super70s-01B2F4.04584127032014@bonxibon.datemas.de>, super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote: > Front plates are kind of a dumb idea really both practically and > economically, my state hasn't required them for several decades. front plates are required because of the proliferation of photo radar and red light cameras.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-31 21:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <bpuo22Fka8gU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #58249 |
On 2014-03-31 19:58:12 +0000, nospam said: > In article <super70s-01B2F4.04584127032014@bonxibon.datemas.de>, > super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote: > >> Front plates are kind of a dumb idea really both practically and >> economically, my state hasn't required them for several decades. > > front plates are required because of the proliferation of photo radar > and red light cameras. If front plates are required why don't the car manufacturers provide a proper mounting place, one which is set back from the front of the front bumper so that the plate doesn't act as a scratching item if the front bumper toudhes another parked car. -- James Leo Ryan - Austin, Texas
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-04-01 16:15 +1200 |
| Message-ID | <010420141615220660%YourName@YourISP.com> |
| In reply to | #58259 |
In article <bpuo22Fka8gU1@mid.individual.net>, TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft@me.com> wrote: > On 2014-03-31 19:58:12 +0000, nospam said: > > > > In article <super70s-01B2F4.04584127032014@bonxibon.datemas.de>, > > super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote: > > > >> Front plates are kind of a dumb idea really both practically and > >> economically, my state hasn't required them for several decades. > > > > front plates are required because of the proliferation of photo radar > > and red light cameras. > > If front plates are required why don't the car manufacturers provide a > proper mounting place, one which is set back from the front of the > front bumper Few cars have mounting points for roof-racks, extra front lights, etc., but that doesn't stop some people adding these things. Some cars actually do have a place for a front plate, although it has become rare these days. Even if there's no actual inset moulded into the bumper, there will be mounting points underneath the bumper because many countries do require front plates on cars / buses / vans / trucks. In some places it is legal to have a sticker / decal version on the front instead of an actual plate. > so that the plate doesn't act as a scratching item if the > front bumper toudhes another parked car. You shouldn't be touching another parked car with any part of your car anyway. I've got plastic surrounds on my car's licence plates. You can buy them from "any good car parts store", but mine were free from the dealer / workshop (with their small logo on them of course). The first pair broke after years in the weather, so they gave me a new pair.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-31 23:16 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <310320142316568105%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #58259 |
In article <bpuo22Fka8gU1@mid.individual.net>, TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft@me.com> wrote: > >> Front plates are kind of a dumb idea really both practically and > >> economically, my state hasn't required them for several decades. > > > > front plates are required because of the proliferation of photo radar > > and red light cameras. > > If front plates are required why don't the car manufacturers provide a > proper mounting place, one which is set back from the front of the > front bumper so that the plate doesn't act as a scratching item if the > front bumper toudhes another parked car. the bigger question is why are the bumpers making contact at all. learn to not hit things.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-31 22:36 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <bpuqikFkp4hU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #58261 |
[in response to the following regarding the placement of front license plates and the bumping of bumpers when parking] > the bigger question is why are the bumpers making contact at all. > > learn to not hit things. I can remember when the bumpers on cars were metal and were capable of taking a reasonable bump without there being a problem. It often happened when you were backing into a small parking spot that you tapped your rear bumper with the front bumper of the car behind you. And when this happened there was no damage to either car. I have seen quite a few bumpers which have been damaged from having encountered a slight bump from a parking car. I think that this is an example of where style takes precedence over function! -- James Leo Ryan - Austin, Texas
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-04-01 18:25 +1200 |
| Message-ID | <010420141825112137%YourName@YourISP.com> |
| In reply to | #58265 |
In article <bpuqikFkp4hU1@mid.individual.net>, TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft@me.com> wrote: > [in response to the following regarding the placement of front license > plates and the bumping of bumpers when parking] > > > the bigger question is why are the bumpers making contact at all. > > > > learn to not hit things. > > I can remember when the bumpers on cars were metal and were capable of > taking a reasonable bump without there being a problem. It often > happened when you were backing into a small parking spot that you > tapped your rear bumper with the front bumper of the car behind you. > And when this happened there was no damage to either car. I have seen > quite a few bumpers which have been damaged from having encountered a > slight bump from a parking car. I think that this is an example of > where style takes precedence over function! Bumpers in the good old days were simply there as protection stop your car's bodywork from damage. Bumpers these days are designed to do things like partially and slowly collapse on impact to absorb some of the momentum, protect pedestrians, etc. Even a light impact can damage the underlying "foam" even when the plastic outer casing still looks fine. Like most things these days, cars are designed as throw away items when "broken", instead of designed to actually last decades and be easily repairable like they used to. :-(
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-04-02 18:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <SalmonEgg-9500D7.18300402042014@news80.forteinc.com> |
| In reply to | #58268 |
In article <010420141825112137%YourName@YourISP.com>, Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote: > Bumpers these days are designed to do things like partially and slowly > collapse on impact to absorb some of the momentum, protect pedestrians, > etc. Even a light impact can damage the underlying "foam" even when the > plastic outer casing still looks fine. As a nit-picker, I know (algebraic) momentum is conserved. What you want is a reduction of collision forces (acceleration) by making collisions take longer to complete. The absorption is that of energy. I is also conserved but converted into heat so that riders do not get banged up. -- Sam Conservatives are against Darwinism but for natural selection. Liberals are for Darwinism but totally against any selection.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-31 15:58 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <310320141558118647%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #58125 |
In article <533192b3$0$9659$c3e8da3$e408f015@news.astraweb.com>, Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> wrote: > > I also remember Click an Clacks suggesting leaving dad cars unlocked in > > a bad section of town. > > Cars are registered via the VIN. If it gets used in a bank robbery, say, > the cops will come to _your_ door. Or in this case, your dad's door. and they'll quickly figure out that you weren't involved.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-22 13:43 +1200 |
| Message-ID | <220320141343245245%YourName@YourISP.com> |
| In reply to | #58039 |
In article <lgiiu9$c7g$1@solani.org>, ErikRS <mac-dane@is.invalid> wrote: > Davoud wrote: > > It breaks my heart to take this Dual 2GHz G5 to the recycle bin, but > > that's what I'm going to do on Monday, 24 March, if no one picks it up > > in Gambrills, Maryland, about 12 miles west of Annapolis, by that date. > > Why not give it to some second-hand aid store instead? > > ...Sadly it's such a long walk from Denmark to Maryland - else I'd > gladly take it.:-) There would be quite a few people who would happily *buy* it from all the usual second-hand places (eBay, Craigslist, etc.). At worst it could be sold as parts.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system
csiph-web