Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #118474
| Path | csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.system |
| Subject | Re: Dark Mode |
| Date | 28 Sep 2018 14:47:09 GMT |
| Organization | People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates |
| Lines | 36 |
| Message-ID | <g16t7dF16f5U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <pogmqk$o7f$1@news.albasani.net> <slrnpqoght.glb.timmcn@sugaree.local> <pohn18$1m37$1@gioia.aioe.org> <grZqD.94114$vJ1.78614@fx05.iad> <slrnpqqmrb.1i3.timmcn@tennessee-jed.local> <280920180926253078%timstreater@greenbee.net> |
| X-Trace | individual.net f9F7sba+KFaHzULi80XRCwuLpS2tPO5AQJSzvTQ2QbiKZNyInN |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:fGtgqiHW75W/GcAWXtbmQcNjEO8= |
| X-No-Archive | Yes |
| MMail-Copies-To | nobody |
| X-Face | _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1<n@LQ!aZ7vLO_nWbK~@T'XIS0,oAJcU.qLM dk/j8Udo?O"o9B9Jyx+ez2:B<nx(k3EdHnTvB]'eoVaR495,Rv~/vPa[e^JI+^h5Zk*i`Q;ezqDW< ZFs6kmAJWZjOH\8[$$7jm,Ogw3C_%QM'|H6nygNGhhl+@}n30Nz(^vWo@h>Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) |
| User-Agent | slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:118474 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 2018-09-28, Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> wrote: > In article <slrnpqqmrb.1i3.timmcn@tennessee-jed.local>, Tim McNamara ><timmcn@bitstream.net> wrote: >>On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 00:57:48 -0400, JF Mezei >><jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: >>> >>> The point is that it was Apple that argued dark mode was bad and that >>> its black on white background was far superior, and now it does the >>> opposite. "WAHHH!!! Apple did something I don't like!!!! WAHHHHHHHH!!!!" Get over yourself. >>Well, no. Have you tried it? Some things are light text on a dark >>background, some things are not. The intent seems to be to recede the >>interface in favor of the content. I'm not sure I like it so far. > > I suspect that is exactly where it will turn out to fail. One needs the > interface to stand out enough, so that you know what is interface and > what is content. The original aqua was very glossy, too much IMO, so > that when it was toned down that was an improvement and is the reason > I'm still on Mavericks. Then they toned it down to next to nothing with > the flat look we see in versions after Mavericks. > > If the interface recedes too much then it becomes unusable. Funny. I don't find the interface of macOS to be unusable at all. And I actually prefer the flatter appearance. I find macOS *way* more usable than Windows 10 and the slew of Linux window managers I've used. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Dark Mode Wade Garrett <wade@cooler.net> - 2018-09-26 15:31 -0400
Re: Dark Mode "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2018-09-26 22:05 +0000
Re: Dark Mode Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2018-09-27 00:50 +0000
Re: Dark Mode Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2018-09-26 21:36 -0500
Re: Dark Mode Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2018-09-27 16:41 +1200
Re: Dark Mode JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2018-09-27 00:57 -0400
Re: Dark Mode nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 01:05 -0400
Re: Dark Mode Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2018-09-27 18:37 +1200
Re: Dark Mode Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2018-09-27 17:36 -0500
Re: Dark Mode Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2018-09-28 09:26 +0100
Re: Dark Mode Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2018-09-28 14:47 +0000
Re: Dark Mode Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2018-09-28 21:54 +0100
Re: Dark Mode Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2018-09-28 23:24 +0000
Re: Dark Mode Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2018-09-28 17:19 +0000
csiph-web