Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #56759
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.system |
| Subject | Re: Super Duper v. CCC for rotating/incremental backups. |
| Date | 20 Feb 2014 16:33:44 GMT |
| Organization | People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates |
| Lines | 19 |
| Message-ID | <bmmp37Fevf5U7@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <gaednTV_Y74tupjOnZ2dnUVZ_oadnZ2d@giganews.com> <190220141615571025%jimsgibson@gmail.com> <bml154F44o8U1@mid.individual.net> <le3rm3$343$1@dont-email.me> <slrnlgc7e9.ku.g.kreme@oswin.local> <le59du$6ig$1@reader2.panix.com> |
| X-Trace | individual.net rmsmr9MnG6OCb3ZV46PYdAbs8biFDFjKUHYIHiS8ZW7UMb9YT2 |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:k4zd+llXQijyY3hE9LEt0qr5K/w= |
| X-Face | _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1<n@LQ!aZ7vLO_nWbK~@T'XIS0,oAJcU.qLM dk/j8Udo?O"o9B9Jyx+ez2:B<nx(k3EdHnTvB]'eoVaR495,Rv~/vPa[e^JI+^h5Zk*i`Q;ezqDW< ZFs6kmAJWZjOH\8[$$7jm,Ogw3C_%QM'|H6nygNGhhl+@}n30Nz(^vWo@h>Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) |
| User-Agent | slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:56759 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 2014-02-20, billy@MIX.COM <billy@MIX.COM> wrote: > Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> writes: > >> And my screen is *never* unlocked unless I am using the machine. Not on >> any machine I've ever used. > > For those unaware of it, run Keychain Access, open its Preferences, > and check the "Show keychain status in menu bar" box. Then, when you > want to lock your screen, just click on the lock icon and select Lock > Screen. Great tip. That's one of the first things I do when setting up any Mac. Very handy! -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Super Duper v. CCC for rotating/incremental backups. Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-19 16:52 -0500
Re: Super Duper v. CCC for rotating/incremental backups. Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-19 16:15 -0800
Re: Super Duper v. CCC for rotating/incremental backups. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-20 00:39 +0000
Re: Super Duper v. CCC for rotating/incremental backups. me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-02-20 03:09 +0000
Re: Super Duper v. CCC for rotating/incremental backups. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-20 15:22 +0000
Re: Super Duper v. CCC for rotating/incremental backups. billy@MIX.COM - 2014-02-20 16:10 +0000
Re: Super Duper v. CCC for rotating/incremental backups. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-20 16:33 +0000
Re: Super Duper v. CCC for rotating/incremental backups. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-20 17:44 +0000
Re: Super Duper v. CCC for rotating/incremental backups. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-20 17:52 +0000
Re: Super Duper v. CCC for rotating/incremental backups. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-21 01:32 +0000
Re: Super Duper v. CCC for rotating/incremental backups. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-21 17:13 +0000
Re: Super Duper v. CCC for rotating/incremental backups. Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-20 17:39 -0500
Re: Super Duper v. CCC for rotating/incremental backups. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-21 01:33 +0000
Re: Super Duper v. CCC for rotating/incremental backups. Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-20 20:44 -0500
Re: Super Duper v. CCC for rotating/incremental backups. Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-20 17:37 -0500
Re: Super Duper v. CCC for rotating/incremental backups. Ned Mantei <ned.mantei@biol.ethz.ch> - 2014-02-20 09:21 +0100
Re: Super Duper v. CCC for rotating/incremental backups. billy@MIX.COM - 2014-02-20 16:20 +0000
Re: Super Duper v. CCC for rotating/incremental backups. Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> - 2014-02-25 15:49 -0800
csiph-web