Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #56726

Re: Super Duper v. CCC for rotating/incremental backups.

From Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups comp.sys.mac.system
Subject Re: Super Duper v. CCC for rotating/incremental backups.
Date 2014-02-20 00:39 +0000
Organization People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Message-ID <bml154F44o8U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <gaednTV_Y74tupjOnZ2dnUVZ_oadnZ2d@giganews.com> <190220141615571025%jimsgibson@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Just a note: 

One thing that always drives me nuts with SuperDuper scheduled backups
is that it rewrites all cron table entries (even ones that have nothing
at all to do with SD) using tab characters as delimiters, which means
things are extremely wide, spanning multiple lines. I've asked them
(years ago) to address this, and their response was borderline dismissive. 

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-19 16:52 -0500
  Re: Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-19 16:15 -0800
    Re: Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-20 00:39 +0000
      Re: Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-02-20 03:09 +0000
        Re: Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-20 15:22 +0000
          Re: Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. billy@MIX.COM - 2014-02-20 16:10 +0000
            Re: Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-20 16:33 +0000
            Re: Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-20 17:44 +0000
              Re: Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-20 17:52 +0000
                Re: Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-21 01:32 +0000
                Re: Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-21 17:13 +0000
              Re: Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-20 17:39 -0500
                Re: Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-21 01:33 +0000
                Re: Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-20 20:44 -0500
            Re: Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-20 17:37 -0500
    Re: Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. Ned Mantei <ned.mantei@biol.ethz.ch> - 2014-02-20 09:21 +0100
  Re: Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. billy@MIX.COM - 2014-02-20 16:20 +0000
  Re: Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> - 2014-02-25 15:49 -0800

csiph-web