Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #56729

Re: Super Duper v. CCC for rotating/incremental backups.

From me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király)
Newsgroups comp.sys.mac.system
Subject Re: Super Duper v. CCC for rotating/incremental backups.
Date 2014-02-20 03:09 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <le3rm3$343$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <gaednTV_Y74tupjOnZ2dnUVZ_oadnZ2d@giganews.com> <190220141615571025%jimsgibson@gmail.com> <bml154F44o8U1@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
> One thing that always drives me nuts with SuperDuper scheduled backups

I can't use the scheduled backups at all. They require the same user 
account to be logged in, in the foregound, and with the screen lock 
off when the scheduled time arrives. I have no idea what user account 
will be in front at any given time. So I can't use the scheduling 
feature.

> I've asked them (years ago) to address this, and their response was 
> borderline dismissive. 

Ditto.

-- 
K.

Lang may your lum reek.

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-19 16:52 -0500
  Re: Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> - 2014-02-19 16:15 -0800
    Re: Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-20 00:39 +0000
      Re: Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-02-20 03:09 +0000
        Re: Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-20 15:22 +0000
          Re: Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. billy@MIX.COM - 2014-02-20 16:10 +0000
            Re: Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-20 16:33 +0000
            Re: Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-20 17:44 +0000
              Re: Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-20 17:52 +0000
                Re: Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-21 01:32 +0000
                Re: Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-21 17:13 +0000
              Re: Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-20 17:39 -0500
                Re: Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-21 01:33 +0000
                Re: Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-20 20:44 -0500
            Re: Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-20 17:37 -0500
    Re: Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. Ned Mantei <ned.mantei@biol.ethz.ch> - 2014-02-20 09:21 +0100
  Re: Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. billy@MIX.COM - 2014-02-20 16:20 +0000
  Re: Super Duper v.  CCC  for rotating/incremental backups. Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> - 2014-02-25 15:49 -0800

csiph-web