Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.acorn.programmer > #5786
| From | Richard Ashbery <basura@invalid.addr.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.acorn.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence |
| Date | 2019-06-23 14:10 +0100 |
| Organization | None |
| Message-ID | <57c8a5327abasura@invalid.addr.uk> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <57c8384f3bbasura@invalid.addr.uk> <mpro.ptiowz0137v62032t.news@stevefryatt.org.uk> <57c8955578basura@invalid.addr.uk> <20190623120736.3390b842@ian-460-p050na> <mpro.ptjyef01sni5u02sz.news@stevefryatt.org.uk> |
In article <mpro.ptjyef01sni5u02sz.news@stevefryatt.org.uk>, Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> wrote: > On 23 Jun, Ian wrote in message > <20190623120736.3390b842@ian-460-p050na>: > > The array%() is being initialised from (0) to (17). (18) would > > contain the zero. (0) contains the three. > > > > Random numbers are 1 to 18. So three doesn't appear, zero does. > > > > Add '0,' so that array%()=0,3,4,5,6,8 etc. and it should work. > > > > I haven't tested it. > > > > HTH, Ian > It would be better to leave > array%()=3,4,5,6,8 ... > and then do > PRINT array%(RND(18) - 1) No that doesn't work - it fails to take into account the last number in the array (120). Ian's method does work with all numbers being randomly displayed, albeit with some numbers displayed consecutively. Regards Richard
Back to comp.sys.acorn.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Specific numbers but in a random sequence Richard Ashbery <basura@invalid.addr.uk> - 2019-06-21 21:31 +0100
Re:Specific numbers but in a random sequence Gavin Crawford <gc@dentrassis.com> - 2019-06-21 22:27 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2019-06-22 11:48 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Richard Ashbery <basura@invalid.addr.uk> - 2019-06-22 12:03 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Richard Ashbery <basura@invalid.addr.uk> - 2019-06-22 16:46 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Someone Somewhere <nntpac@gmail.com> - 2019-06-22 17:11 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Richard Ashbery <basura@invalid.addr.uk> - 2019-06-22 18:21 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> - 2019-06-22 21:29 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Richard Ashbery <basura@invalid.addr.uk> - 2019-06-23 11:17 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Ian <Ian.Hamilton@AAUG.net> - 2019-06-23 12:07 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Paul Oates <oatespaul@btinternet.com> - 2019-06-23 13:17 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> - 2019-06-23 13:51 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Richard Ashbery <basura@invalid.addr.uk> - 2019-06-23 14:10 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> - 2019-06-23 15:59 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Richard Ashbery <basura@invalid.addr.uk> - 2019-06-23 17:14 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Richard Ashbery <basura@invalid.addr.uk> - 2019-06-23 14:01 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Paul Oates <oatespaul@btinternet.com> - 2019-06-22 17:52 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Julian Fry <julianfry@orpheusmail.co.uk> - 2019-06-22 17:56 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Julian Fry <JulianFry@compuserve.com> - 2019-06-22 18:05 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Sebastian Barthel <naitsabes@freenet.de> - 2019-06-24 07:37 +0000
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Richard Ashbery <basura@invalid.addr.uk> - 2019-06-24 20:13 +0100
csiph-web