Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.acorn.programmer > #5783
| From | Paul Oates <oatespaul@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.acorn.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence |
| Date | 2019-06-23 13:17 +0100 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <0f5da0c857.Paul@oatespaul.btinternet.com> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <qeljvl$1i81$1@gioia.aioe.org> <57c8384f3bbasura@invalid.addr.uk> <mpro.ptiowz0137v62032t.news@stevefryatt.org.uk> <57c8955578basura@invalid.addr.uk> <20190623120736.3390b842@ian-460-p050na> |
In message <20190623120736.3390b842@ian-460-p050na>
Ian <Ian.Hamilton@AAUG.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 11:17:26 +0100
> Richard Ashbery <basura@invalid.addr.uk> wrote:
>> In article <mpro.ptiowz0137v62032t.news@stevefryatt.org.uk>,
>> Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> wrote:
>>> On 22 Jun, Richard Ashbery wrote in message
>>> <57c8384f3bbasura@invalid.addr.uk>:
>>
>>>> RND(500)MOD18 for example appears to improve the distribution.
>>>> How can I incorporate this idea with my 18 specific numbers in
>>>> the array?
>>
>>> You don't need to. Just do this:
>>
>>> DIM array%(18)
>>> array%() = 3,4,5,6,8,9,10,12,15,18,20,24,30,36,45,60,90,120
>>> y = RND(-TIME)
>>> FOR loop = 1 TO 5
>>> FOR I% = 0 TO 18
>>> PRINT array%(RND(18))
>>> NEXT I%
>>> NEXT loop
>>
>> That's pretty much what I eventually arrived at. RND(18) makes other
>> variables appear in a more random distribution as other respondents
>> have pointed out earlier. There's only one problem which makes no
>> sense to me in that 3 never appears but 0 does.
>>
>> Can others confirm please?
>>
> The array%() is being initialised from (0) to (17). (18) would contain
> the zero. (0) contains the three.
> Random numbers are 1 to 18. So three doesn't appear, zero does.
> Add '0,' so that array%()=0,3,4,5,6,8 etc. and it should work.
> I haven't tested it.
> HTH,
> Ian
The array has 18 items, but the FOR...NEXT loop has 19. Perhaps it would
be as well to test the program by commenting out the 'PRINT array%
(RND(18))' and inserting 'PRINT loop, I%'. (just out of interest why is
'loop' not an Integer variable like I%?). Then when you are happy that the
loops are working you could revert. If you wanted, as an interim step
after testing the loops, you could replace '(RND(18))' with '(I%)' to
ensure all the entries in the array are produced.
regards
--
Paul Oates
oatespaul@btinternet.com
Back to comp.sys.acorn.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Specific numbers but in a random sequence Richard Ashbery <basura@invalid.addr.uk> - 2019-06-21 21:31 +0100
Re:Specific numbers but in a random sequence Gavin Crawford <gc@dentrassis.com> - 2019-06-21 22:27 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2019-06-22 11:48 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Richard Ashbery <basura@invalid.addr.uk> - 2019-06-22 12:03 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Richard Ashbery <basura@invalid.addr.uk> - 2019-06-22 16:46 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Someone Somewhere <nntpac@gmail.com> - 2019-06-22 17:11 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Richard Ashbery <basura@invalid.addr.uk> - 2019-06-22 18:21 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> - 2019-06-22 21:29 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Richard Ashbery <basura@invalid.addr.uk> - 2019-06-23 11:17 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Ian <Ian.Hamilton@AAUG.net> - 2019-06-23 12:07 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Paul Oates <oatespaul@btinternet.com> - 2019-06-23 13:17 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> - 2019-06-23 13:51 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Richard Ashbery <basura@invalid.addr.uk> - 2019-06-23 14:10 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Steve Fryatt <news@stevefryatt.org.uk> - 2019-06-23 15:59 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Richard Ashbery <basura@invalid.addr.uk> - 2019-06-23 17:14 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Richard Ashbery <basura@invalid.addr.uk> - 2019-06-23 14:01 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Paul Oates <oatespaul@btinternet.com> - 2019-06-22 17:52 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Julian Fry <julianfry@orpheusmail.co.uk> - 2019-06-22 17:56 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Julian Fry <JulianFry@compuserve.com> - 2019-06-22 18:05 +0100
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Sebastian Barthel <naitsabes@freenet.de> - 2019-06-24 07:37 +0000
Re: Specific numbers but in a random sequence Richard Ashbery <basura@invalid.addr.uk> - 2019-06-24 20:13 +0100
csiph-web