Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> |
| Newsgroups | comp.std.c, comp.arch.embedded |
| Subject | Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations |
| Date | Wed, 6 May 2020 19:16:16 +0200 |
| Organization | solani.org |
| Message-ID | <r8urd0$7el$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | <r8uo2j$4l2$1@solani.org> <r8upn1$89t$1@reader2.panix.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Wed, 6 May 2020 17:16:16 -0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | solani.org; logging-data="7637"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 |
| Autocrypt | addr=pkk@spth.de; keydata= mQGiBD+wIQ0RBAD5IkcgQQIAPO93xBBvviI0htuoaeb++GqG51BImx+rnWIS+1z+r3y5jQU5 IRYS8eDC3eR5PFtde/f7/3zxaJIB0bgXB1eMPot5CaN7mpUySVNh9bzH/UP7rVH0Ut7Bx/CI 7EXxhvYE23F/TAf+gS4flFqQ/GdK+MME+dg8J5nFbwCg92xq6iuAvyz7vSho9qbKHsCD3AkE AMbuLLBvk4mPvs19aRGZvT/pows1uzkeNq8fpmzvryb4UxUbU89qlNzA2Bg8ztVZGX9x5drb C4tFE29ZFAHn2bojx2ADxG85+2as8yfcz6sPG4HMzeTtugzPGCeRAXaSknZHsw6AC6LrtsEU sjEZMElfvu8uU4dthfhXOIDVNRHmA/446GsHRLosDHFuDjHpBQJPJSBnFDyRSCge2Q0gup96 GGhNc7KkYeIB8Dh7dCN3h5RYXflVTspxmgANUa+RFpL4pynsF16rtkfeh0UR8uLdoaGwMChw GyWIdRhX8MLQ8v3WHPCUrB/1f5xhRypQgF0/c8y4w5BarGQXy7AM0PljBbQxUGhpbGlwcCBL cmF1c2UgKFN0YW5kYXJkc2NobMO8c3NlbCkgPHBra0BzcHRoLmRlPohbBBMRAgAbBQI/sCEN BgsJCAcDAgMVAgMDFgIBAh4BAheAAAoJEG7VFfsbKC6a31wAni0szX2x9jjNqqch2fE5zOkd IJsSAKCuZaayyxtHPb6rpQtbDMUTS7rXe7kCDQQ/sCFjEAgAknletShOrS5UeFH6V09TksPL 5w8S1SaQThvdberD74Uaq5Weoeu5fCzeDlhRvTC+wQFxL5W2wdM3ZhqRpZIri7X3ab/WUsqv 0FCK8LB9HfioafjNg7uQbyUannvyBkj4WAfHrTDgDbNw8EJMehab9MUeCUZEkhXrk9b3rp3r /uoic1pymK0aZX+wUfayXGANAAk75HAruEWxpGObjcJ587tTOsfDAFnJlXKXLVXuqJDSraym ankbEfyX1CmfhetYn+s1fCpAHX/GOIQPEG2BCdeLdy8ApN0l6MIrRkJKbBnvnc8HsUI7Elfu huemyI/Nvhxk5+tuOS5kZBIyZKe8CwADBQf+InHwn00dafe8XNod9jRsHgCqE259ocEiL0Zs rw3NfwbckR6YVGtoovHna6I3+o4F4GPS/869WFw/w1HGGsa9t6SRjWeoH221bxYc+aTstGbA hd9OuDXnXFi9Mokh34cXQexvrVYjfOdbAl9TRezPBRygzr6XvUdUtIpZjZhW0WSdhdF67Obl F+S9kCX7v3Q0kSqnjzk05Qs5kHyaE+7BKiGQhvCz51J++CTCc/g16eOVVabHNLalAEInq1jn jAB15+JxDcA3HFup7+sHkkscAEQPPi8aNnWR32su0w9hfE1qQkvyHhOiPX2GVhm/Lt0C1vGr ZCB9Bve3r8M+Z7uMaohGBBgRAgAGBQI/sCFjAAoJEG7VFfsbKC6aQ4oAnibaEjyIlrRMTmyL K76lqhloK0EPAKCQsgCELscmeJnxyjV1zZt6AJ6ctQ== |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:gYgSCwt/MwJE3zbjCl58CUsiaVo= |
| In-Reply-To | <r8upn1$89t$1@reader2.panix.com> |
| Content-Language | en-US |
| X-User-ID | eJwFwQEBACAIA7BKivxoHEDfP4IbFic7nKBD0I2x1Zk8jvLAVnnZC2ta4hJlzDLojTOh+COyETg= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.std.c:6077 comp.arch.embedded:29613 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
Am 06.05.20 um 18:47 schrieb Grant Edwards: >> >> Do you see any reason those could not be provided on some C >> implementation? > > Memory size. Could you elaborate? I do not see a problem there: If the programmer doesn't use e.g. memcpy(), no memcpy() will be linked in, so memory size would not be affected. And if the programmer needs the functionality of memcpy(), I don't see why using it would be worse than the programmer rollinghteir own version. Philipp
Back to comp.std.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2020-05-06 18:19 +0200
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2020-05-06 16:47 +0000
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2020-05-06 19:16 +0200
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2020-05-06 18:10 +0000
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2020-05-06 15:10 -0400
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2020-05-06 16:08 -0400
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-05-06 13:22 -0700
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2020-05-06 22:29 -0400
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-05-07 15:43 +0200
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2020-05-07 06:08 -0700
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2020-05-06 22:36 +0200
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2020-05-06 20:57 +0000
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@t-online.de> - 2020-05-06 23:25 +0200
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2020-05-06 21:34 +0000
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2020-05-07 10:17 +0200
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2020-05-07 18:45 +0300
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2020-05-07 10:16 +0200
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@t-online.de> - 2020-05-07 21:39 +0200
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2020-05-07 21:44 +0200
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2020-05-07 12:54 -0700
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2020-05-08 08:38 -0700
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2020-05-08 21:30 +0200
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2020-05-30 02:04 -0700
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2020-08-04 10:58 +0200
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-04 07:35 -0700
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2020-05-06 22:34 +0200
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations upsidedown@downunder.com - 2020-05-07 09:13 +0300
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2020-05-07 18:47 +0300
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2020-05-07 15:51 +0000
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2020-05-08 10:09 +0300
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> - 2020-05-08 18:48 +0200
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Andrew Smallshaw <andrews@sdf.org> - 2020-05-08 17:01 +0000
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2020-05-08 20:05 +0200
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations upsidedown@downunder.com - 2020-05-07 08:59 +0300
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2020-05-07 06:14 -0700
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2020-05-07 21:38 +0200
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2020-05-08 12:03 -0700
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2020-05-08 21:15 +0200
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2020-05-08 21:27 +0200
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com.invalid> - 2020-05-15 15:13 +0200
Re: Making more of the C standard library mandatory for freestanding implementations David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-05-09 00:25 +0200
csiph-web