Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming

comp.programming

15696 articles, 3351 threads (numbers 150 – 16945) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
quick output and slow log (1 reply — unroll) Krzysztof Żelechowski <krzzel@krzzel> 2014-10-05 20:16 +0200
   → Re: quick output and slow log "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> 2014-10-05 20:48 +0200
 
Please read again (1 reply — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-09-14 17:18 -0700
   → Re: Please read again "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> 2014-09-27 14:54 -0700
 
On Risks and Vulnerabilities of Digital Signatures (5 replies — unroll) Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> 2014-06-15 10:38 +0200
   → Re: On Risks and Vulnerabilities of Digital Signatures "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> 2014-06-15 13:02 +0100
     → Re: On Risks and Vulnerabilities of Digital Signatures Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> 2014-06-15 20:44 +0200
   → Re: On Risks and Vulnerabilities of Digital Signatures Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> 2014-06-15 20:34 +0200
   → Re: On Risks and Vulnerabilities of Digital Signatures Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> 2014-06-21 07:48 +0200
   → Re: On Risks and Vulnerabilities of Digital Signatures Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> 2014-09-21 11:41 +0200
 
flat binary (2 replies — unroll) "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> 2014-09-18 16:08 -0400
   → Re: flat binary Jongware <jongware@no-spam.plz> 2014-09-19 11:36 +0200
     → Re: flat binary "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> 2014-09-19 15:50 -0400
 
Two object oriented methods, which is better? (5 replies — unroll) Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> 2014-09-18 21:40 +0300
   → Re: Two object oriented methods, which is better? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> 2014-09-18 20:46 +0200
     → Re: Two object oriented methods, which is better? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> 2014-09-18 18:59 +0000
       → Re: Two object oriented methods, which is better? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> 2014-09-18 21:08 +0200
         → Re: Two object oriented methods, which is better? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> 2014-09-18 19:26 +0000
   → Re: Two object oriented methods, which is better? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> 2014-09-18 19:24 +0000
 
gcc-4.x.x and endianess (22 replies — unroll) "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> 2014-09-13 21:41 -0400
   → Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> 2014-09-14 09:14 +0200
     → Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> 2014-09-14 15:31 -0400
       → Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> 2014-09-14 21:38 +0200
         → Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> 2014-09-14 22:05 +0100
           → Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> 2014-09-15 09:40 +0200
             → Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> 2014-09-15 11:51 +0100
               → Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> 2014-09-15 13:49 +0100
               → Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> 2014-09-15 17:16 +0200
                 → Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> 2014-09-15 22:23 +0100
                 → Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> 2014-09-16 10:44 +0200
                 → Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> 2014-09-16 00:18 +0000
           → Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> 2014-09-15 06:18 -0500
         → Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> 2014-09-15 14:23 -0400
           → Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> 2014-09-15 21:08 +0200
             → Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> 2014-09-15 19:32 -0400
           → Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> 2014-09-15 21:07 +0100
             → Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> 2014-09-15 21:48 -0400
   → Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess Jongware <jongware@no-spam.plz> 2014-09-15 10:57 +0200
   → Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> 2014-09-15 14:06 +0100
     → Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> 2014-09-15 21:50 -0400
       → Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> 2014-09-17 09:54 +0100
         → Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> 2014-09-17 22:29 -0400
 
Online Multiplayer AI/Bot Programmning Game: open to all - Try it now Aude Barral <aude.barral@codingame.com> 2014-09-16 11:35 -0700
 
About my Parallel Sort library (2 replies — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-09-15 14:37 -0700
   → Re: About my Parallel Sort library Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-09-15 14:54 -0700
   → Re: About my Parallel Sort library Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-09-16 10:31 -0700
 
About my Parallel archiver... Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-09-15 14:10 -0700
 
About my SemaCondvar and SemaMonitor... Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-09-15 13:37 -0700
 
Research to Create Automated Buffer Overflow Protection (28 replies — unroll) Heidi Brayer <hap1026@gmail.com> 2014-08-26 09:11 -0700
   → Re: Research to Create Automated Buffer Overflow Protection "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> 2014-08-26 18:54 +0200
     → Re: Research to Create Automated Buffer Overflow Protection Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> 2014-08-26 18:16 +0100
       → Re: Research to Create Automated Buffer Overflow Protection "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> 2014-08-26 19:35 +0200
         → Re: Research to Create Automated Buffer Overflow Protection Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> 2014-08-26 18:59 +0100
           → Re: Research to Create Automated Buffer Overflow Protection "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> 2014-08-26 21:26 +0200
             → Re: Research to Create Automated Buffer Overflow Protection Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> 2014-08-26 20:33 +0100
               → Re: Research to Create Automated Buffer Overflow Protection "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> 2014-08-26 21:50 +0200
                 → Re: Research to Create Automated Buffer Overflow Protection Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> 2014-08-26 21:41 +0100
                 → Re: Research to Create Automated Buffer Overflow Protection "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> 2014-08-27 10:21 +0200
                 → Re: Research to Create Automated Buffer Overflow Protection "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> 2014-08-27 10:27 +0100
                 → Re: Research to Create Automated Buffer Overflow Protection "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> 2014-08-27 11:51 +0200
         → Re: Research to Create Automated Buffer Overflow Protection Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.invalid> 2014-08-26 20:39 +0200
           → Re: Research to Create Automated Buffer Overflow Protection "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> 2014-08-26 20:13 +0100
           → Re: Research to Create Automated Buffer Overflow Protection "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> 2014-08-26 21:38 +0200
             → Re: Research to Create Automated Buffer Overflow Protection Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> 2014-08-26 23:11 +0200
               → Re: Research to Create Automated Buffer Overflow Protection "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> 2014-08-27 09:50 +0200
                 → Re: Research to Create Automated Buffer Overflow Protection "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> 2014-08-27 10:16 +0100
                 → Re: Research to Create Automated Buffer Overflow Protection "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> 2014-08-27 12:15 +0200
                 → Re: Research to Create Automated Buffer Overflow Protection Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> 2014-08-27 14:40 +0100
             → Re: Research to Create Automated Buffer Overflow Protection "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> 2014-08-27 10:13 +0100
               → Re: Research to Create Automated Buffer Overflow Protection "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> 2014-08-27 14:06 +0200
             → Re: Research to Create Automated Buffer Overflow Protection "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> 2014-08-27 10:32 +0100
               → Re: Research to Create Automated Buffer Overflow Protection "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> 2014-08-27 12:14 +0200
         → Re: Research to Create Automated Buffer Overflow Protection "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> 2014-08-26 14:06 -0700
       → Re: Research to Create Automated Buffer Overflow Protection Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.invalid> 2014-08-26 20:16 +0200
         → Re: Research to Create Automated Buffer Overflow Protection Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> 2014-08-30 09:20 -0700
   → Re: Research to Create Automated Buffer Overflow Protection Jongware <jongware@no-spam.plz> 2014-09-15 10:47 +0200
     → Re: Research to Create Automated Buffer Overflow Protection Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> 2014-09-15 10:46 +0100
 
About lock convoy and my scalable MLock .... (1 reply — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-09-14 17:06 -0700
   → Re: About lock convoy and my scalable MLock .... Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-09-14 17:19 -0700
 
Throttling Concurrency Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-09-14 16:50 -0700
 
PC and Mac GUI? (5 replies — unroll) Mark Storkamp <mstorkamp@yahoo.com> 2014-09-04 11:02 -0500
   → Re: PC and Mac GUI? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> 2014-09-04 17:19 +0100
     → Re: PC and Mac GUI? Mark Storkamp <mstorkamp@yahoo.com> 2014-09-08 08:17 -0500
   → Re: PC and Mac GUI? Koneko <Koneko@idontwantspamfrom.net> 2014-09-09 05:58 +0300
     → Re: PC and Mac GUI? Mark Storkamp <mstorkamp@yahoo.com> 2014-09-09 08:19 -0500
   → Re: PC and Mac GUI? August Karlstrom <fusionfile@gmail.com> 2014-09-14 11:24 +0200
 
CFP: ADAPT'15 with a new community-driven paper evaluation gfursin@gmail.com 2014-09-11 06:13 -0700
 
Evolutionary Improvement of Quality Attributes: Performance in Practice Heidi Brayer <hap1026@gmail.com> 2014-09-08 09:33 -0700
 
storing credit card data (5 replies — unroll) b <mike7411@gmail.com> 2014-09-04 22:05 -0700
   → Re: storing credit card data Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> 2014-09-05 01:51 -0500
     → Re: storing credit card data Mark Carroll <mtbc@bcs.org> 2014-09-05 08:26 +0100
       → Re: storing credit card data "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> 2014-09-05 12:41 +0100
         → Re: storing credit card data Mark Carroll <mtbc@bcs.org> 2014-09-05 13:08 +0100
           → Re: storing credit card data "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> 2014-09-05 16:16 +0100
 
Multiple linear regression 1.01 Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-08-29 15:53 -0700
 
So i will explain to you what is exactly my scalable MLock algorithm.. (1 reply — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-08-29 15:26 -0700
   → Re: So i will explain to you what is exactly my scalable MLock algorithm.. Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-08-29 15:29 -0700
 
write back call trace (1 reply — unroll) "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> 2014-08-25 21:17 -0400
   → Re: write back call trace JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> 2014-08-28 00:34 +0700
 
Re: PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT jaggy.ncit@gmail.com 2014-08-26 13:56 -0700
 
Now one of the best of Eric Clapton... Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-08-18 15:37 -0700
 
J.J Cale / Call Me The Breeze Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-08-18 15:19 -0700
 
J J Cale - Devil in Disguise Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-08-18 13:18 -0700
 
Beautiful song Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-08-18 11:28 -0700
 
Another beautiful song... Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-08-18 11:12 -0700
 
A beautiful song... Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-08-18 10:58 -0700
 
icse books (4 replies — unroll) raghucbsc@gmail.com 2014-08-09 04:34 -0700
   → Re: icse books Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> 2014-08-09 13:10 +0100
   → Re: icse books mechinenishyam@gmail.com 2014-08-14 04:02 -0700
     → Re: icse books Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> 2014-08-14 12:28 +0100
       → Re: icse books Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> 2014-08-17 17:46 -0700
 
A beautiful song by J.J Cale... Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-08-17 13:12 -0700
 
Another wonderful song that i want to share with you... Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-08-17 12:59 -0700
 
I want to share with this wonderful song of J.J Cale... Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-08-17 12:32 -0700
 
large integer (7 replies — unroll) b <mike7411@gmail.com> 2014-08-11 16:55 -0700
   → Re: large integer Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> 2014-08-12 00:47 +0000
     → Re: large integer "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> 2014-08-12 12:17 +0100
       → Re: large integer Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> 2014-08-14 12:29 +0100
         → Re: large integer "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> 2014-08-15 09:31 +0100
   → Re: large integer Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll> 2014-08-12 03:39 +0200
     → Re: large integer "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> 2014-08-12 12:23 +0100
   → Re: large integer Mark Storkamp <mstorkamp@yahoo.com> 2014-08-12 09:36 -0500
 
icse books raghucbsc@gmail.com 2014-08-13 02:57 -0700
 
icse books vaasuisc@gmail.com 2014-08-11 04:24 -0700
 
data structure curiosity (3 replies — unroll) b <mike7411@gmail.com> 2014-08-02 22:50 -0700
   → Re: data structure curiosity Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> 2014-08-03 08:16 +0100
   → Re: data structure curiosity Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> 2014-08-04 09:56 -0700
   → Re: data structure curiosity "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> 2014-08-05 00:46 +0100
 
From pseudo to spaghetti (2 replies — unroll) b <mike7411@gmail.com> 2014-08-03 19:43 -0700
   → Re: From pseudo to spaghetti Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> 2014-08-04 04:51 +0000
   → Re: From pseudo to spaghetti Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> 2014-08-04 09:11 -0700
 
HTML5 for Mobile Software Apps at the Edge Heidi Brayer <hap1026@gmail.com> 2014-07-22 06:33 -0700
 
Four Principles for Engineering Scalable, Big Data Systems Heidi Brayer <hap1026@gmail.com> 2014-07-14 08:43 -0700
 
High level programming Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-07-05 17:49 -0700
 
Desavantage of high level programming... (1 reply — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-07-02 20:50 -0700
   → Re: Desavantage of high level programming... Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-07-05 16:42 -0700
 
High level programming languages... (1 reply — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-07-02 18:36 -0700
   → Re: High level programming languages... Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-07-03 19:37 -0700
 
High level programming languages v block level programming environments (7 replies — unroll) Jacob cuffe-soan <cuffesoanjacob@gmail.com> 2014-07-02 13:45 -0700
   → Re: High level programming languages v block level programming environments Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> 2014-07-02 21:08 +0000
   → Re: High level programming languages v block level programming environments Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-07-02 17:25 -0700
     → Re: High level programming languages v block level programming environments Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-07-02 17:53 -0700
   → Re: High level programming languages v block level programming environments Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-07-02 17:53 -0700
     → Re: High level programming languages v block level programming environments Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-07-02 17:55 -0700
       → Re: High level programming languages v block level programming environments Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-07-02 18:05 -0700
   → Re: High level programming languages v block level programming environments Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> 2014-07-03 10:04 +0100
 
High level ways of learning Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-07-02 19:46 -0700
 
Another advantage of high level programming languages... Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-07-02 19:09 -0700
 
FPC 64-bit 2.7.1 (7 replies — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-06-29 13:06 -0700
   → Re: FPC 64-bit 2.7.1 Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-06-29 14:20 -0700
     → Re: FPC 64-bit 2.7.1 Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-06-29 15:14 -0700
   → Re: FPC 64-bit 2.7.1 Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-06-29 14:30 -0700
     → Re: FPC 64-bit 2.7.1 JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> 2014-06-30 02:46 +0700
       → Re: FPC 64-bit 2.7.1 Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-06-29 16:18 -0700
         → Re: FPC 64-bit 2.7.1 JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> 2014-06-30 14:58 +0700
   → Re: FPC 64-bit 2.7.1 Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-06-29 15:14 -0700
 
Parallel Conjugate gradient linear system solver (1 reply — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-06-29 18:41 -0700
   → Re: Parallel Conjugate gradient linear system solver Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-06-29 18:43 -0700
 
Parallel Dual simplex Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-06-29 18:07 -0700
 
About my Parallel Dual Simplex solver... Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-06-29 16:54 -0700
 
FPC 2.6.4 64-it and FPC 2.7.1 64-bit (1 reply — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-06-29 14:51 -0700
   → Re: FPC 2.6.4 64-it and FPC 2.7.1 64-bit Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-06-29 15:14 -0700
 
To Melzzzzz (14 replies — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-06-28 15:51 -0700
   → Re: To Melzzzzz Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.invalid> 2014-06-29 04:10 +0200
     → Re: To Melzzzzz Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-06-29 10:33 -0700
       → Re: To Melzzzzz Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> 2014-06-29 16:39 +0200
         → Re: To Melzzzzz Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-06-29 10:47 -0700
           → Re: To Melzzzzz Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> 2014-06-29 17:00 +0200
             → Re: To Melzzzzz Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-06-29 11:14 -0700
               → Re: To Melzzzzz Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> 2014-06-29 17:20 +0200
               → Re: To Melzzzzz Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-06-29 11:23 -0700
                 → Re: To Melzzzzz Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> 2014-06-29 17:31 +0200
                 → Re: To Melzzzzz Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-06-29 11:32 -0700
                 → Re: To Melzzzzz Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-06-29 11:38 -0700
     → Re: To Melzzzzz Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-06-29 10:41 -0700
       → Re: To Melzzzzz Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.invalid> 2014-06-29 16:46 +0200
         → Re: To Melzzzzz Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-06-29 10:54 -0700

← Newer ~Page 93 of ~120 (articles 4647–4806) Older →


csiph-web