Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming > #4798

Re: Two object oriented methods, which is better?

Show all headers | View raw

On 2014-09-18, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 18:59:34 +0000 (UTC)
> Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2014-09-18, Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 21:40:19 +0300
>> > Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> wrote:
>> >> What is more object oriented? Which is better?
>> >
>> > First can do whatever with array, while second shows clear
>> > intent.
>> > I'll go with second since it is clearer what function does.
>> 
>> It's probably also clear what modify_array does, if you have its
>> definition.
>
> Problem is that modify_array is "dynamic method", what I guess means
> that one probably don;t know what it does ;)

Yes; --- but "I don't know WTF this does" is the essence of object-oriented! :)

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Two object oriented methods, which is better? Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> - 2014-09-18 21:40 +0300
  Re: Two object oriented methods, which is better? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-09-18 20:46 +0200
    Re: Two object oriented methods, which is better? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-09-18 18:59 +0000
      Re: Two object oriented methods, which is better? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-09-18 21:08 +0200
        Re: Two object oriented methods, which is better? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-09-18 19:26 +0000
  Re: Two object oriented methods, which is better? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-09-18 19:24 +0000

csiph-web