Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming

comp.programming

15696 articles, 3351 threads (numbers 150 – 16945) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
Threadpool with priorities version 1.5 (stable version) has been ported to Delphi XE-XE4. aminer <aminer@toto.net> 2013-07-01 19:41 -0700
 
More information... (1 reply — unroll) aminer <aminer@toto.net> 2013-06-30 15:11 -0700
   → Re: More information... aminer <aminer@toto.net> 2013-06-30 16:00 -0700
 
Scalable and relaxed MPMC priority Queue to ,version 1.02 aminer <aminer@toto.net> 2013-06-30 14:53 -0700
 
Re: I am a socialist Chris Vine <chris@cvine--nospam--.freeserve.co.uk> 2013-06-28 14:46 +0100
 
Re: Read the following about the... Jongware <jongware@no-spam.plz> 2013-06-28 10:11 +0200
 
Re: I will updated soon Jongware <jongware@no-spam.plz> 2013-06-27 11:44 +0200
 
Re: A presentation on concurrency Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> 2013-06-26 06:28 -0400
 
JADE-S, a block cipher with authentication (integrity check) based on use of permutation polynomials mod 2**n Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> 2013-06-24 20:35 +0200
 
Generating multi-level associative arrays (8 replies — unroll) Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> 2013-06-22 21:19 +0300
   → Re: Generating multi-level associative arrays Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> 2013-06-23 08:30 +0100
     → Re: Generating multi-level associative arrays Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> 2013-06-23 15:16 +0300
       → Re: Generating multi-level associative arrays Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> 2013-06-23 16:02 +0100
         → Re: Generating multi-level associative arrays Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> 2013-06-23 18:06 +0300
           → Re: Generating multi-level associative arrays Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> 2013-06-23 18:52 +0100
             → Re: Generating multi-level associative arrays Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> 2013-06-24 14:52 +0300
               → Re: Generating multi-level associative arrays Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> 2013-06-24 14:53 +0300
   → Solved: Generating multi-level associative arrays Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> 2013-06-24 20:36 +0300
 
Iterating leaf tree nodes Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> 2013-06-24 14:51 +0300
 
A practical alternative of the method of random perumtation of Fisher & Yates (1 reply — unroll) Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> 2013-06-22 14:10 +0200
   → Re: A practical alternative of the method of random perumtation of Fisher & Yates Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> 2013-06-24 09:30 +0200
 
Re: Lockfreee algorithms... (1 reply — unroll) "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> 2013-06-21 14:24 -0700
   → Re: Lockfreee algorithms... "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> 2013-06-21 22:03 -0700
 
Re: Lockfree algorithms are good for small number of cores "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> 2013-06-20 22:11 -0700
 
Re: Dmitry Vyukov's distributed rwlock 2 (1 reply — unroll) "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> 2013-06-20 13:26 -0700
   → Re: Dmitry Vyukov's distributed rwlock 2 "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> 2013-06-20 14:01 -0700
 
Re: Asymmetric rwmutex algorithm "Julio Di Egidio" <julio@diegidio.name> 2013-06-20 19:24 +0100
 
Re: Object Pascal with generics make my programming easier (1 reply — unroll) robin.vowels@gmail.com 2013-06-18 15:41 -0700
   → Re: Object Pascal with generics make my programming easier Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> 2013-06-20 18:51 +0200
 
Looking for a SAP CRM consultant naresh p <naresh.requirements@gmail.com> 2013-06-20 08:21 -0700
 
Re: Intel SCC 48-core x86 Processor (1 reply — unroll) "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> 2013-06-19 17:58 -0700
   → Re: Intel SCC 48-core x86 Processor "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> 2013-06-19 18:57 -0700
 
A block encryption processing idea taken from linear algebra (7 replies — unroll) Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> 2013-06-17 09:41 +0200
   → Re: A block encryption processing idea taken from linear algebra JJ <duh@nah.meh> 2013-06-17 17:13 +0700
     → Re: A block encryption processing idea taken from linear algebra Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> 2013-06-17 16:01 +0200
       → Re: A block encryption processing idea taken from linear algebra JJ <duh@nah.meh> 2013-06-18 13:03 +0700
         → Re: A block encryption processing idea taken from linear algebra Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> 2013-06-18 08:43 +0200
           → Re: A block encryption processing idea taken from linear algebra JJ <duh@nah.meh> 2013-06-18 18:12 +0700
             → Re: A block encryption processing idea taken from linear algebra Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> 2013-06-18 15:08 +0200
               → Re: A block encryption processing idea taken from linear algebra JJ <duh@nah.meh> 2013-06-19 15:53 +0700
 
Re: SemCondvar version 1.1... (4 replies — unroll) Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> 2013-06-14 01:47 +0200
   → Re: SemCondvar version 1.1... Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> 2013-06-14 02:12 +0200
     → Re: SemCondvar version 1.1... Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> 2013-06-14 02:20 +0200
       → Re: SemCondvar version 1.1... Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> 2013-06-14 02:40 +0200
       → Re: SemCondvar version 1.1... Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> 2013-06-14 02:56 +0200
 
SPOJ Problem HOTELS (1 reply — unroll) singh13490mayank@gmail.com 2013-05-31 09:26 -0700
   → Re: SPOJ Problem HOTELS jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) 2013-06-11 21:36 +0000
 
Object oriented programming? (23 replies — unroll) root <NoEMail@home.org> 2013-05-29 14:25 +0000
   → Re: Object oriented programming? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> 2013-05-29 18:19 +0200
     → Re: Object oriented programming? root <NoEMail@home.org> 2013-05-30 13:51 +0000
       → Re: Object oriented programming? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> 2013-05-30 19:48 +0200
   → Re: Object oriented programming? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> 2013-05-29 09:21 -0700
     → Re: Object oriented programming? root <NoEMail@home.org> 2013-05-30 13:56 +0000
   → Re: Object oriented programming? James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> 2013-05-29 13:05 -0700
     → Re: Object oriented programming? root <NoEMail@home.org> 2013-05-30 14:07 +0000
       → Re: Object oriented programming? "osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> 2013-05-30 10:49 -0500
       → Re: Object oriented programming? James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> 2013-06-01 12:18 -0700
   → Re: Object oriented programming? Kicer <a@b.c> 2013-05-29 22:13 +0200
     → Re: Object oriented programming? root <NoEMail@home.org> 2013-05-30 14:22 +0000
       → Re: Object oriented programming? Kicer <a@b.c> 2013-06-01 02:54 +0200
         → Re: Object oriented programming? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> 2013-06-01 07:43 -0700
           → Re: Object oriented programming? Kicer <a@b.c> 2013-06-05 18:16 +0200
   → Re: Object oriented programming? rugxulo@gmail.com 2013-05-30 22:22 -0700
     → Re: Object oriented programming? root <NoEMail@home.org> 2013-05-31 14:05 +0000
       → Re: Object oriented programming? "Charles Hottel" <chottel@earthlink.net> 2013-05-31 12:12 -0400
         → Re: Object oriented programming? root <NoEMail@home.org> 2013-05-31 20:31 +0000
           → Re: Object oriented programming? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> 2013-06-01 00:59 +0100
   → Re: Object oriented programming? Willem <willem@turtle.stack.nl> 2013-06-01 07:54 +0000
     → Re: Object oriented programming? Jongware <jongware@no-spam.plz> 2013-06-07 11:05 +0200
   → Re: Object oriented programming? Paul N <gw7rib@aol.com> 2013-06-02 13:11 -0700
     → Re: Object oriented programming? Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> 2013-06-03 11:06 -0700
 
a problem with C++ (4 replies — unroll) msouri2003@gmail.com 2013-06-04 07:37 -0700
   → Re: a problem with C++ Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> 2013-06-04 08:29 -0700
     → Re: a problem with C++ blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> 2013-06-04 17:26 +0000
   → Re: a problem with C++ msouri2003@gmail.com 2013-06-04 08:44 -0700
   → Re: a problem with C++ Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> 2013-06-05 17:52 -0700
 
Create android app for ur YouTube channel - earn more subscribers Miki-m <mips6.network@gmail.com> 2013-06-02 09:59 -0700
 
******* AN AUTOMATED PROOF! ******* Hercules ofZeus <herc.is.here@gmail.com> 2013-05-30 19:16 -0700
 
توصيات فوركس وتداول فوركس في بحور الفوركس serbnas@gmail.com 2013-05-30 15:35 -0700
 
Practically Free Live 3 to 5 day Online Codecamps on Grails, Rails, jQuery, Spring, Java SE, Java EE, HTML5, Android sangshinpassion@gmail.com 2013-05-29 11:37 -0700
 
Recording paths taken in trees of random forest herakleides@gmail.com 2013-05-24 23:54 -0700
 
Re: library(lambda) benchmarks around? Graham Cooper <grahamcooper7@gmail.com> 2013-05-23 16:28 -0700
 
Re: see hot*south Indian aunties bedroom nude videos shettyraghunandan@gmail.com 2013-05-23 10:31 -0700
 
HTTPS slowness (3 replies — unroll) bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> 2013-05-22 12:05 -0700
   → Re: HTTPS slowness Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> 2013-05-22 15:10 -0700
   → Re: HTTPS slowness JJ <duh@nah.meh> 2013-05-23 09:08 +0700
     → Re: HTTPS slowness Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> 2013-05-22 21:27 -0700
 
Programming Open-Ended Plots In Games (10 replies — unroll) Brian <briansipler@yahoo.com> 2013-05-18 18:13 -0700
   → Re: Programming Open-Ended Plots In Games Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> 2013-05-18 19:31 -0700
     → Re: Programming Open-Ended Plots In Games "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> 2013-05-19 10:12 +0100
       → Re: Programming Open-Ended Plots In Games "osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> 2013-05-19 05:43 -0500
         → Re: Programming Open-Ended Plots In Games Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> 2013-05-19 14:22 +0300
         → Re: Programming Open-Ended Plots In Games Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> 2013-05-19 08:39 -0700
         → Re: Programming Open-Ended Plots In Games "Charles Hottel" <chottel@earthlink.net> 2013-05-19 13:45 -0400
         → Re: Programming Open-Ended Plots In Games "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> 2013-05-20 08:30 +0100
     → Re: Programming Open-Ended Plots In Games Brian <briansipler@yahoo.com> 2013-05-19 14:55 -0700
       → Re: Programming Open-Ended Plots In Games Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> 2013-05-22 07:52 -0700
         → Re: Programming Open-Ended Plots In Games Brian <briansipler@yahoo.com> 2013-05-22 12:19 -0700
 
Using Equations To Represent Graphics (8 replies — unroll) Brian <briansipler@yahoo.com> 2013-05-21 09:19 -0700
   → Re: Using Equations To Represent Graphics James <jjpuzzles@wowway.com> 2013-05-21 11:28 -0700
     → Re: Using Equations To Represent Graphics Brian <briansipler@yahoo.com> 2013-05-21 12:22 -0700
       → Re: Using Equations To Represent Graphics James <jjpuzzles@wowway.com> 2013-05-21 13:10 -0700
   → Re: Using Equations To Represent Graphics JJ <duh@nah.meh> 2013-05-22 02:44 +0700
   → Re: Using Equations To Represent Graphics "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> 2013-05-21 13:48 -0700
   → Re: Using Equations To Represent Graphics "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> 2013-05-21 19:01 -0500
     → Re: Using Equations To Represent Graphics Brian <briansipler@yahoo.com> 2013-05-21 17:25 -0700
   → Re: Using Equations To Represent Graphics bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> 2013-05-22 09:20 -0700
 
PROLOG UNDER THE HOOD - New Prolog Engine! Graham Cooper <grahamcooper7@gmail.com> 2013-05-20 23:05 -0700
 
AVL versus Red-Black Trees (4 replies — unroll) "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> 2013-05-15 22:33 -0500
   → Re: AVL versus Red-Black Trees "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> 2013-05-16 05:58 +0100
   → Re: AVL versus Red-Black Trees Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> 2013-05-16 02:42 -0500
   → Re: AVL versus Red-Black Trees Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> 2013-05-18 15:41 -0700
     → Re: AVL versus Red-Black Trees "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> 2013-05-20 08:25 +0100
 
CFP: MuCoCoS Workshop at PACT-2013 (Edinburgh, Scotland, UK) SP <sabri.pllana@gmail.com> 2013-05-20 00:10 -0700
 
PROLOG TESTING SEQUENCE - Getting Your ROBOT Off The Ground! Graham Cooper <grahamcooper7@gmail.com> 2013-05-19 22:37 -0700
 
Re: THE SUCCESSOR OF DOG IS ANOTHER DOG. Like, Fido I is succeeded by FIDO II Graham Cooper <grahamcooper7@gmail.com> 2013-05-19 16:22 -0700
 
Compare two methods of random permutations (40 replies — unroll) Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> 2013-05-08 23:35 +0200
   → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> 2013-05-11 21:31 -0700
     → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> 2013-05-13 08:07 +0200
       → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> 2013-05-13 02:34 -0700
   → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> 2013-05-13 08:01 +0200
   → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> 2013-05-13 08:26 -0700
     → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> 2013-05-13 11:42 -0700
       → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> 2013-05-16 13:46 -0700
     → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> 2013-05-13 21:09 +0200
       → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> 2013-05-13 12:57 -0700
         → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> 2013-05-13 22:59 +0200
           → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> 2013-05-13 15:28 -0700
             → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> 2013-05-14 10:54 +0200
               → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> 2013-05-14 05:32 -0700
                 → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> 2013-05-14 22:46 +0200
                 → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> 2013-05-14 14:19 -0700
                 → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> 2013-05-14 15:06 -0700
                 → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> 2013-05-15 10:16 +0200
                 → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> 2013-05-15 03:54 -0700
                 → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> 2013-05-15 07:11 -0700
                 → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> 2013-05-15 11:04 -0700
                 → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> 2013-05-15 11:06 -0700
                 → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> 2013-05-15 12:55 -0700
                 → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> 2013-05-16 06:10 +0100
                 → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations pacman@kosh.dhis.org (Alan Curry) 2013-05-16 06:57 +0000
                 → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> 2013-05-16 09:26 +0100
                 → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> 2013-05-16 01:35 -0700
                 → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> 2013-05-17 14:11 +0200
                 → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> 2013-05-17 08:13 -0700
                 → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> 2013-05-19 11:06 +0200
                 → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> 2013-05-19 03:14 -0700
                 → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> 2013-05-19 13:26 +0200
                 → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> 2013-05-19 04:59 -0700
                 → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> 2013-05-19 14:13 +0200
                 → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> 2013-05-19 05:52 -0700
                 → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> 2013-05-19 15:06 +0200
                 → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> 2013-05-19 06:50 -0700
                 → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> 2013-05-19 16:14 +0200
                 → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> 2013-05-19 08:11 -0700
                 → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> 2013-05-19 17:15 +0200
                 → Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> 2013-05-19 17:24 +0200
 
Learning Lisp The Bump Free Way (1 reply — unroll) Mentifex <mentifex@myuw.net> 2013-04-25 09:39 -0700
   → Re: Learning Lisp The Bump Free Way Graham Cooper <grahamcooper7@gmail.com> 2013-05-18 03:08 -0700
 
A Question About Fractals (16 replies — unroll) Brian <briansipler@yahoo.com> 2013-01-19 12:10 -0800
   → Re: A Question About Fractals Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> 2013-01-19 12:45 -0800
     → Re: A Question About Fractals Brian <briansipler@yahoo.com> 2013-01-19 13:09 -0800
       → Re: A Question About Fractals Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> 2013-01-19 14:16 -0800
       → Re: A Question About Fractals Robin Vowels <robin.vowels@gmail.com> 2013-01-19 15:53 -0800
   → Re: A Question About Fractals "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> 2013-02-18 15:53 -0800
     → Re: A Question About Fractals "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> 2013-02-18 16:36 -0800
       → Re: A Question About Fractals "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> 2013-02-20 18:25 -0800
     → Re: A Question About Fractals "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> 2013-02-26 02:21 -0800
       → Re: A Question About Fractals "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> 2013-03-03 17:59 -0800
         → Re: A Question About Fractals luser droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> 2013-05-17 18:55 -0700
           → Re: A Question About Fractals "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> 2013-05-17 22:27 -0700
       → Re: A Question About Fractals "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> 2013-03-04 13:17 -0800
       → Re: A Question About Fractals "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> 2013-03-10 18:10 -0700
       → Re: A Question About Fractals "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> 2013-03-10 18:21 -0700
   → Re: A Question About Fractals James Dow Allen <gmail@jamesdowallen.nospam> 2013-02-19 17:45 +0000
     → Re: A Question About Fractals "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> 2013-02-19 13:11 -0800
 
LAN scan (3 replies — unroll) bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> 2013-05-16 12:42 -0700
   → Re: LAN scan JJ <duh@nah.meh> 2013-05-17 04:51 +0700
   → Re: LAN scan James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> 2013-05-17 11:36 -0700
     → Re: LAN scan James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> 2013-05-17 15:39 -0700
 
iterate and delete (5 replies — unroll) bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> 2013-05-06 11:13 -0700
   → Re: iterate and delete JJ <duh@nah.meh> 2013-05-07 03:35 +0700
   → Re: iterate and delete Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> 2013-05-07 09:39 +0100
     → Re: iterate and delete bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> 2013-05-08 07:54 -0700
   → Re: iterate and delete malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com 2013-05-09 07:58 -0700
     → Re: iterate and delete "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> 2013-05-09 22:53 +0100
 
Dissertation Help- Programmers Perceptions and Software Quality (2 replies — unroll) komalkorotana@gmail.com 2013-03-06 12:00 -0800
   → Re: Dissertation Help- Programmers Perceptions and Software Quality komal singh <komalkorotana@gmail.com> 2013-03-13 05:05 -0700
     → Re: Dissertation Help- Programmers Perceptions and Software Quality Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> 2013-05-06 03:40 -0700
 
Parallel archiver version 1.65 ... (1 reply — unroll) aminer <aminer@toto.net> 2013-04-22 13:11 -0700
   → Re: Parallel archiver version 1.65 ... aminer <aminer@toto.net> 2013-04-22 13:38 -0700
 
Re: Prime Generalization Conjecture marty.musatov@gmail.com 2013-04-21 18:00 -0700
 
I will add... aminer <aminer@toto.net> 2013-04-21 14:38 -0700
 
QuickLZ algorithm aminer <aminer@toto.net> 2013-04-21 13:51 -0700
 
IHCA compression algorithm aminer <aminer@toto.net> 2013-04-21 13:09 -0700
 
Parallel archiver version 1.64 aminer <aminer@toto.net> 2013-04-21 12:40 -0700

← Newer ~Page 102 of ~120 (articles 3262–3606) Older →


csiph-web