Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #3303
| From | Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: Compare two methods of random permutations |
| Date | 2013-05-14 10:54 +0200 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <kmsu34$gog$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <a79b56db-b5df-40f3-a764-390e42f65094@googlegroups.com> <kmrdpe$njc$1@news.albasani.net> <6924f81f-a463-4cc2-a1f6-75fcb752fbc8@googlegroups.com> <kmrk7g$50k$1@news.albasani.net> <7803c2ae-d258-4eb6-90b5-2d0bb21ef21a@googlegroups.com> |
Am 14.05.2013 00:28, schrieb bob: > If you want to learn more about how well different PRNG algorithms work, > you may want to read the book Seminumerical Algorithms > by Donald Knuth. [snip] It's nice that you post the reference. I am in possession of that great book since over a decade. I am interested in the topic of PRN generation and has myself attempted to design PRNGs several times. Recently I designed one, which is the function genrandom() that is contained in my encryption software source code named JADE (http://s13.zetaboards.com/Crypto/topic/6948465/1/#new). I should be very grateful, if interested readers of this group would kindly look at that PRNG and eventually give me comments and critiques. (My email address above is a valid one.) M. K. Shen
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-08 23:35 +0200
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-11 21:31 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-13 08:07 +0200
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-13 02:34 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-13 08:01 +0200
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2013-05-13 08:26 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-13 11:42 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2013-05-16 13:46 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-13 21:09 +0200
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2013-05-13 12:57 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-13 22:59 +0200
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2013-05-13 15:28 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-14 10:54 +0200
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-14 05:32 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-14 22:46 +0200
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-14 14:19 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-14 15:06 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-15 10:16 +0200
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-15 03:54 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2013-05-15 07:11 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-15 11:04 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-15 11:06 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2013-05-15 12:55 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2013-05-16 06:10 +0100
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations pacman@kosh.dhis.org (Alan Curry) - 2013-05-16 06:57 +0000
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2013-05-16 09:26 +0100
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-16 01:35 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-17 14:11 +0200
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-17 08:13 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-19 11:06 +0200
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-19 03:14 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-19 13:26 +0200
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-19 04:59 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-19 14:13 +0200
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-19 05:52 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-19 15:06 +0200
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-19 06:50 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-19 16:14 +0200
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-19 08:11 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-19 17:15 +0200
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-19 17:24 +0200
csiph-web