Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #3349
| From | Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: Compare two methods of random permutations |
| Date | 2013-05-19 17:24 +0200 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <knaqql$oe0$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | (12 earlier) <840c4f7e-d75d-4777-b85d-22c98887272c@d8g2000pbe.googlegroups.com> <knaioe$81l$1@news.albasani.net> <702a5f9e-c588-493f-a0e0-bd844669c7f8@h9g2000pbr.googlegroups.com> <knamne$fu6$1@news.albasani.net> <d76bf0e0-a0a2-48c3-9997-59ad0d226f67@n5g2000pbg.googlegroups.com> |
Am 19.05.2013 17:11, schrieb James Dow Allen: > On May 19, 9:14 pm, Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.s...@t-online.de> wrote: >> But then you are returning to the common Fisher and >> Yates scheme, which employs generally a good PRNG >> returning a PRN in [0, 1) as real numbers, as explained >> in Knuth's book. That's nothing new, isn't it? >> >> M. K. Shen > > Invoke the PRNG 8 times instead of 51 times. > What were you trying to do anyway, do > you even remember? [Addendum to my previous post] I forgot to answer your question. I want to, if possible, use only 2 PRNs in range [0,n-1] for e.g. n=52. M. K. Shen
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-08 23:35 +0200
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-11 21:31 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-13 08:07 +0200
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-13 02:34 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-13 08:01 +0200
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2013-05-13 08:26 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-13 11:42 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2013-05-16 13:46 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-13 21:09 +0200
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2013-05-13 12:57 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-13 22:59 +0200
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2013-05-13 15:28 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-14 10:54 +0200
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-14 05:32 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-14 22:46 +0200
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-14 14:19 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-14 15:06 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-15 10:16 +0200
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-15 03:54 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2013-05-15 07:11 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-15 11:04 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-15 11:06 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2013-05-15 12:55 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2013-05-16 06:10 +0100
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations pacman@kosh.dhis.org (Alan Curry) - 2013-05-16 06:57 +0000
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2013-05-16 09:26 +0100
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-16 01:35 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-17 14:11 +0200
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-17 08:13 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-19 11:06 +0200
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-19 03:14 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-19 13:26 +0200
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-19 04:59 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-19 14:13 +0200
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-19 05:52 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-19 15:06 +0200
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-19 06:50 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-19 16:14 +0200
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-19 08:11 -0700
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-19 17:15 +0200
Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-19 17:24 +0200
csiph-web