Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #5564
| Path | csiph.com!optima2.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> |
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: An advantage of RSA encryption |
| Date | Tue, 04 Aug 2015 14:43:58 +0100 |
| Organization | go, ion artisan! |
| Lines | 25 |
| Message-ID | <mpqffv$p3t$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <mpimf8$cc7$1@news.albasani.net> <mpj2fj$361$1@news.albasani.net> <mpjc91$jt2$1@news.albasani.net> <mplkff$vol$1@news.albasani.net> <mplpk5$9n6$1@news.albasani.net> <20150803102300.194@kylheku.com> <mpqc3n$1q6$1@news.albasani.net> <mpqd07$f8r$1@dont-email.me> <mpqden$416$4@news.albasani.net> <mpqe5v$jse$2@dont-email.me> <55C0BD04.5010305@t-online.de> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Tue, 4 Aug 2015 13:42:23 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="bbec9967c55d39f11ca29ee1f0b15ce1"; logging-data="25725"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19twcVlBMVkQoBpei2r3Uc5kRb54GJaKbYNgHp3suD1Gw==" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <55C0BD04.5010305@t-online.de> |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:mVj9344oxVenHXyDtb05zV3OEjY= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.programming:5564 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 04/08/15 14:24, Mok-Kong Shen wrote: > > I meant naturally the parentheses in my answer to Kylheku, namely: > > (Note anyway that in HAC there is given a way to implement a CSPRNG > with RSA. So, if a CSPRNG were required to implement RSA, that > would lead to a viscious circle.) It isn't even a vicious circle, let alone a viscious circle. The easiest way to explain this is to consider two CSPRNGs, X and Y. X can be used to generate RSA primes, thus making it possible to use RSA. RSA can be used to implement Y. I don't see the problem, and I certainly don't see any circles, be they vicious, viscious, viscous, or even vicarious. -- Richard Heathfield Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999 Sig line 4 vacant - apply within
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-01 16:52 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2015-08-01 20:17 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-01 23:04 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-02 04:32 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2015-08-02 19:36 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-02 21:04 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2015-08-03 17:31 +0000
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 14:44 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-08-04 14:01 +0100
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 15:07 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-08-04 14:21 +0100
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 15:24 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-08-04 14:43 +0100
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 15:49 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-08-04 15:56 +0100
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 22:05 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2015-08-04 15:24 +0000
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 22:10 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-08-04 21:42 +0100
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 23:05 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-08-04 22:18 +0100
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 23:58 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 16:45 -0700
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 16:55 -0700
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 22:12 -0700
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-08-05 07:58 +0100
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 08:06 -0700
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 06:50 -0400
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-03 18:28 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 22:07 -0400
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-06 11:01 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 15:26 +0200
csiph-web