Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming > #3285 > unrolled thread

Compare two methods of random permutations

Started byMok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de>
First post2013-05-08 23:35 +0200
Last post2013-05-19 17:24 +0200
Articles 1 on this page of 41 — 6 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.programming


Contents

  Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-08 23:35 +0200
    Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-11 21:31 -0700
      Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-13 08:07 +0200
        Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-13 02:34 -0700
    Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-13 08:01 +0200
    Re: Compare two methods of random permutations bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2013-05-13 08:26 -0700
      Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-13 11:42 -0700
        Re: Compare two methods of random permutations bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2013-05-16 13:46 -0700
      Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-13 21:09 +0200
        Re: Compare two methods of random permutations bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2013-05-13 12:57 -0700
          Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-13 22:59 +0200
            Re: Compare two methods of random permutations bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2013-05-13 15:28 -0700
              Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-14 10:54 +0200
                Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-14 05:32 -0700
                  Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-14 22:46 +0200
                    Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-14 14:19 -0700
                      Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-14 15:06 -0700
                        Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-15 10:16 +0200
                          Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-15 03:54 -0700
                        Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2013-05-15 07:11 -0700
                          Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-15 11:04 -0700
                            Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-15 11:06 -0700
                            Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2013-05-15 12:55 -0700
                            Re: Compare two methods of random permutations "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2013-05-16 06:10 +0100
                              Re: Compare two methods of random permutations pacman@kosh.dhis.org (Alan Curry) - 2013-05-16 06:57 +0000
                                Re: Compare two methods of random permutations "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2013-05-16 09:26 +0100
                              Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-16 01:35 -0700
                                Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-17 14:11 +0200
                                  Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-17 08:13 -0700
                                    Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-19 11:06 +0200
                                      Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-19 03:14 -0700
                                        Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-19 13:26 +0200
                                          Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-19 04:59 -0700
                                            Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-19 14:13 +0200
                                              Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-19 05:52 -0700
                                                Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-19 15:06 +0200
                                                  Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-19 06:50 -0700
                                                    Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-19 16:14 +0200
                                                      Re: Compare two methods of random permutations James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-19 08:11 -0700
                                                        Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-19 17:15 +0200
                                                        Re: Compare two methods of random permutations Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2013-05-19 17:24 +0200

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]


#3349

FromMok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de>
Date2013-05-19 17:24 +0200
Message-ID<knaqql$oe0$1@news.albasani.net>
In reply to#3347
Am 19.05.2013 17:11, schrieb James Dow Allen:
> On May 19, 9:14 pm, Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.s...@t-online.de> wrote:
>> But then you are returning to the common Fisher and
>> Yates scheme, which employs generally a good PRNG
>> returning a PRN in [0, 1) as real numbers, as explained
>> in Knuth's book. That's nothing new, isn't it?
>>
>> M. K. Shen
>
> Invoke the PRNG 8 times instead of 51 times.
> What were you trying to do anyway, do
> you even remember?

[Addendum to my previous post] I forgot to answer your
question. I want to, if possible, use only 2 PRNs
in range [0,n-1] for e.g. n=52.

M. K. Shen

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

Back to top | Article view | comp.programming


csiph-web