Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #11468
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> |
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. |
| Date | Tue, 17 Nov 2020 17:25:30 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 31 |
| Message-ID | <87pn4bj3p1.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink) |
| References | <bfdb5e55-4743-412b-9c38-6be521a7b055n@googlegroups.com> <rp0i4m$4hq$1@dont-email.me> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Injection-Info | reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="a3f68d594c737541b9396ae63b92e4a6"; logging-data="14607"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18dOXUL9Lyj8Xu9gVfurbnv+tIM74ZpQbM=" |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:GI4N078doCh3ZyBp4PlIURgyhVA= sha1:WhMQ67r3J/YiCwZEpEDOZOR/DGA= |
| X-BSB-Auth | 1.48bced948cfe1d3ab8a1.20201117172530GMT.87pn4bj3p1.fsf@bsb.me.uk |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.programming:11468 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> writes: > On 17/11/2020 06:09, K R wrote: >> Lets look shapes with 3,4,5,6,... angles. >> They have inside ∞ crosses. Because by dividing areas with 2, we get ∞ points. >> Lets begin with 2 line connected shapes with 3 and 4 angles. >> We can continue to N shapes. >> Now lets start to go around these shapes with connecting shapes. >> Process can continue forever. >> So we get number N*∞*∞*∞ points. >> The biggest integer is ∞, so there are ∞^4 integers. > > No, ∞ is not an integer. There are infinitely many integers, and > therefore there can be no biggest integer. That makes it sound like it is the infinitude itself that leads to the conclusion, but there are lots of infinite sets with a largest element. > This is easily proved by reductio. If we assume there is a biggest > integer I, we can immediately disprove the assumption by adding 1 to I > to form a new integer J that is 1 larger than I. This is what leads to the conclusion: the axioms for the > relation. > Therefore I is not > the biggest integer, even if we (quite improperly) assign ∞ to I. (Oh, and hi. Haven't seen you around for ages.) -- Ben.
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. K R <ownerofachattingportal@gmail.com> - 2020-11-16 22:09 -0800
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2020-11-17 13:10 +0000
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-11-17 17:25 +0000
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2020-11-18 12:41 +0000
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 14:58 +0100
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Khritjan Robam <hrrobam@gmail.com> - 2020-11-18 06:01 -0800
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2020-11-18 14:42 +0000
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 16:43 +0100
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2020-11-18 18:59 +0000
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 21:39 +0100
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-17 22:36 +0100
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2020-11-18 12:50 +0000
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 15:27 +0100
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2020-11-18 14:50 +0000
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-11-18 15:44 +0000
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 18:09 +0100
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Peter <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2020-11-18 18:00 +0000
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 21:42 +0100
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Peter <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2020-11-18 17:58 +0000
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 21:46 +0100
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2020-11-19 03:49 +0000
Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Khrictian Robam <hrrobam@gmail.com> - 2020-11-19 01:12 -0800
csiph-web