Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming > #11468

Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions.

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk>
Newsgroups comp.programming
Subject Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions.
Date Tue, 17 Nov 2020 17:25:30 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 31
Message-ID <87pn4bj3p1.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink)
References <bfdb5e55-4743-412b-9c38-6be521a7b055n@googlegroups.com> <rp0i4m$4hq$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
Injection-Info reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="a3f68d594c737541b9396ae63b92e4a6"; logging-data="14607"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18dOXUL9Lyj8Xu9gVfurbnv+tIM74ZpQbM="
Cancel-Lock sha1:GI4N078doCh3ZyBp4PlIURgyhVA= sha1:WhMQ67r3J/YiCwZEpEDOZOR/DGA=
X-BSB-Auth 1.48bced948cfe1d3ab8a1.20201117172530GMT.87pn4bj3p1.fsf@bsb.me.uk
Xref csiph.com comp.programming:11468

Show key headers only | View raw


Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> writes:

> On 17/11/2020 06:09, K R wrote:
>> Lets look shapes with 3,4,5,6,... angles.
>> They have inside ∞ crosses. Because by dividing areas with 2, we get ∞ points.
>> Lets begin with 2 line connected shapes with 3 and 4 angles.
>> We can continue to N shapes.
>> Now lets start to go around these shapes with connecting shapes.
>> Process can continue forever.
>> So we get number N*∞*∞*∞ points.
>> The biggest integer is ∞, so there are ∞^4 integers.
>
> No, ∞ is not an integer. There are infinitely many integers, and
> therefore there can be no biggest integer.

That makes it sound like it is the infinitude itself that leads to the
conclusion, but there are lots of infinite sets with a largest element.

> This is easily proved by reductio. If we assume there is a biggest
> integer I, we can immediately disprove the assumption by adding 1 to I
> to form a new integer J that is 1 larger than I.

This is what leads to the conclusion: the axioms for the > relation.

> Therefore I is not
> the biggest integer, even if we (quite improperly) assign ∞ to I.

(Oh, and hi.  Haven't seen you around for ages.)

-- 
Ben.

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. K R <ownerofachattingportal@gmail.com> - 2020-11-16 22:09 -0800
  Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2020-11-17 13:10 +0000
    Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-11-17 17:25 +0000
      Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2020-11-18 12:41 +0000
        Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 14:58 +0100
          Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Khritjan Robam <hrrobam@gmail.com> - 2020-11-18 06:01 -0800
          Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2020-11-18 14:42 +0000
            Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 16:43 +0100
              Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2020-11-18 18:59 +0000
                Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 21:39 +0100
    Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-17 22:36 +0100
      Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2020-11-18 12:50 +0000
        Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 15:27 +0100
          Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2020-11-18 14:50 +0000
          Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-11-18 15:44 +0000
            Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 18:09 +0100
              Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Peter <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2020-11-18 18:00 +0000
                Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 21:42 +0100
          Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Peter <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2020-11-18 17:58 +0000
            Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-11-18 21:46 +0100
    Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2020-11-19 03:49 +0000
      Re: Theorem: There are at least ∞^4 integers in 2 dimensions. Khrictian Robam <hrrobam@gmail.com> - 2020-11-19 01:12 -0800

csiph-web