Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!iGBoWB84plbtTqmX8BR5Tg.user.gioia.aioe.org.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Boris Dorestand <bdorestand@example.com>
Newsgroups: comp.programming
Subject: Re: on (not) finding a 64-bit version of readline.dll
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 14:42:23 -0300
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <86a6r35728.fsf@example.com>
References: <86blbt7e82.fsf@example.com> <rfqnroak5rh5.j3rmmhqxfpk8$.dlg@40tude.net> <861rclz9x0.fsf@example.com> <1h5gnvg6o7oop.3jqhf9lmybr4$.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: iGBoWB84plbtTqmX8BR5Tg.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:fEToEL+k1CRdG+URGGLKON3Jizk=
Xref: csiph.com comp.programming:12347

JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> writes:

> On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:56:43 -0300, Boris Dorestand wrote:
>> JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> writes:
>> 
>> [...]
>> 
>>> You could use the 32-bit version of Rash as well as Racket if Rash's 
>>> functionality is crucial, or if it'll be used for something which requires 
>>> more than 3GB of memory.
>> 
>> (I didn't get the comment on the 3GB-memory.  I thought that maybe
>> 32-bit would let me use less memory, but I'm not sure what the limit
>> is.)
>
> Sorry for the confusion, that's supposed to be:
>
> .. or if it'll be used for something which _DOES NOT_ require more than 3GB
> of memory.

Thanks!  That makes sense now!