Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming.threads

comp.programming.threads

44786 articles, 6830 threads (numbers 65 – 45828) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
I think i have found what is intelligence Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-07 20:40 -0800
 
Read again Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-07 19:25 -0800
 
What's intelligence Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-07 19:22 -0800
 
Lets talk about it now Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-07 18:42 -0800
 
About parallel programming Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-07 18:00 -0800
 
An Architect way of thinking on parallel programming Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-07 17:26 -0800
 
More about scalability (1 reply — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-07 16:38 -0800
   → Re: More about scalability Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-07 17:10 -0800
 
More optimization of the reader-writer algorithms Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-07 16:23 -0800
 
More about reader-writer algorithms Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-07 15:49 -0800
 
About the distributed reader-writer mutex (1 reply — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-07 13:32 -0800
   → Re: About the distributed reader-writer mutex Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-07 13:45 -0800
 
Here is my proof again (1 reply — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-07 11:57 -0800
   → Re: Here is my proof again Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-07 12:10 -0800
 
Here is my proof (2 replies — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-07 11:19 -0800
   → Re: Here is my proof Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-07 11:29 -0800
   → Re: Here is my proof Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-07 11:36 -0800
 
Scalable distributed sequential lock version 1.11 Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-07 10:46 -0800
 
I have just read the following about Intel TSX (3 replies — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-06 17:04 -0800
   → Re: I have just read the following about Intel TSX "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> 2014-12-06 14:42 -0800
     → Re: I have just read the following about Intel TSX Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> 2014-12-07 01:21 +0100
       → Re: I have just read the following about Intel TSX "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> 2014-12-06 16:31 -0800
 
About my new algorithm (5 replies — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-04 19:57 -0800
   → Re: About my new algorithm Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-04 20:07 -0800
   → Re: About my new algorithm "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> 2014-12-05 11:32 -0800
     → Re: About my new algorithm Drazen Kacar <dave@fly.srk.fer.hr> 2014-12-05 22:48 +0000
       → Re: About my new algorithm "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> 2014-12-06 13:45 -0800
         → Re: About my new algorithm "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> 2014-12-06 13:56 -0800
 
About my previous post Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-06 15:51 -0800
 
Here is what's important about reader-writer algorithms... (1 reply — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-06 14:51 -0800
   → Re: Here is what's important about reader-writer algorithms... Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-06 14:56 -0800
 
Here is my new algorithm of a scalable distributed sequential lock (1 reply — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-06 13:43 -0800
   → Re: Here is my new algorithm of a scalable distributed sequential lock Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-06 14:07 -0800
 
Stay tuned a new algorithm is coming Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-05 20:39 -0800
 
More about my scalable distributed sequential lock Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-05 20:13 -0800
 
About RCU and my scalable distributed sequential lock Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-05 18:03 -0800
 
About sequential consistency Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-04 16:58 -0800
 
Sequential consistency of my scalable distributed sequential lock Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-04 16:57 -0800
 
I invite you to listen to this beautiful french song Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-03 19:30 -0800
 
I explain my new algorithm (1 reply — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-03 18:10 -0800
   → Re: I explain my new algorithm Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-03 18:59 -0800
 
More about my scalable distributed sequential lock Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-03 16:44 -0800
 
My new invention called: Scalable Distributed Sequential lock Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-12-03 16:06 -0800
 
About serquential consistency (1 reply — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-11-24 16:09 -0800
   → Re: About serquential consistency anastasiossouris@gmail.com 2014-11-29 02:33 -0800
 
I have just received this email (2 replies — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-11-28 14:11 -0800
   → Re: I have just received this email "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> 2014-11-28 15:44 -0800
   → Re: I have just received this email Gerald Breuer <Gerald.Breuer@gmail.com> 2014-11-29 01:55 +0100
 
New research lights the way to super-fast computers Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-11-27 14:48 -0800
 
About my scalable RWLocks and Seqlock (1 reply — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-11-25 14:27 -0800
   → Re: About my scalable RWLocks and Seqlock Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-11-25 15:44 -0800
 
About my scalable RWLocks (1 reply — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-11-25 14:52 -0800
   → Re: About my scalable RWLocks "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> 2014-11-25 15:20 -0800
 
About Parallel Hahslist Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-11-25 06:25 -0800
 
About Seqlock and sequantial consistency Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-11-24 15:15 -0800
 
Re: How do I look inside an .exe file to view the programming ckay4ever@gmail.com 2014-11-24 10:32 -0800
 
About my projects (1 reply — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-11-08 14:32 -0800
   → Re: About my projects Tom <mail2devnull@web.de> 2014-11-24 15:24 +0100
 
About VISC architecture (2 replies — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-11-15 16:45 -0800
   → Re: About VISC architecture Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-11-15 17:04 -0800
     → Re: About VISC architecture Tom <mail2devnull@web.de> 2014-11-24 15:23 +0100
 
A more scalable Parallel Varfiler and a more scalable Parallel Hashlist (3 replies — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-11-16 15:30 -0800
   → Re: A more scalable Parallel Varfiler and a more scalable Parallel Hashlist Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-11-16 15:46 -0800
     → Re: A more scalable Parallel Varfiler and a more scalable Parallel Hashlist Tom <mail2devnull@web.de> 2014-11-24 15:20 +0100
     → Re: A more scalable Parallel Varfiler and a more scalable Parallel Hashlist Tom <mail2devnull@web.de> 2014-11-24 15:22 +0100
 
The future of computers (1 reply — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-11-17 12:51 -0800
   → Re: The future of computers Tom <mail2devnull@web.de> 2014-11-24 15:19 +0100
 
A very fast concurrent FIFO Queue and a very fast concurrent priority FIFO Queue version 1.2 (2 replies — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-11-21 12:51 -0800
   → Re: A very fast concurrent FIFO Queue and a very fast concurrent priority FIFO Queue version 1.2 Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-11-21 13:10 -0800
     → Re: A very fast concurrent FIFO Queue and a very fast concurrent priority FIFO Queue version 1.2 Tom <mail2devnull@web.de> 2014-11-24 15:18 +0100
 
Actor based model... (2 replies — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-11-19 16:47 -0800
   → Re: Actor based model... Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-11-19 16:56 -0800
     → Re: Actor based model... Tom <mail2devnull@web.de> 2014-11-24 15:18 +0100
 
A very fast concurrent FIFO Queue 1 version 1.3 (1 reply — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-11-21 12:55 -0800
   → Re: A very fast concurrent FIFO Queue 1 version 1.3 Tom <mail2devnull@web.de> 2014-11-24 15:17 +0100
 
More information (1 reply — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-11-21 13:20 -0800
   → Re: More information Tom <mail2devnull@web.de> 2014-11-24 15:16 +0100
 
Mu explanation of my algorithm (1 reply — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-11-21 14:25 -0800
   → Re: Mu explanation of my algorithm Tom <mail2devnull@web.de> 2014-11-24 15:15 +0100
 
Another fast concurrent FIFO Queue and a fast concurrent priority FIFO Queue version 1.0 (1 reply — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-11-22 18:31 -0800
   → Re: Another fast concurrent FIFO Queue and a fast concurrent priority FIFO Queue version 1.0 Tom <mail2devnull@web.de> 2014-11-24 15:13 +0100
 
About “Strong” and “weak” hardware memory models.. Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-11-19 14:58 -0800
 
W have to be smart (3 replies — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-11-18 18:41 -0800
   → Re: W have to be smart Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-11-18 19:10 -0800
   → Re: W have to be smart Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-11-18 19:46 -0800
     → Re: W have to be smart Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-11-18 20:02 -0800
 
Researchers Simplify Parallel Programming Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-11-16 19:01 -0800
 
About Amdahl law (1 reply — unroll) Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-11-15 15:36 -0800
   → Re: About Amdahl law Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-11-15 15:38 -0800
 
More about scalability Ramine <ramine@1.1> 2014-11-15 14:35 -0800

← Newer ~Page 657 of ~683 (articles 2678–2766) Older →


csiph-web