Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #2759
| From | Ramine <ramine@1.1> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads |
| Subject | More about scalability |
| Date | 2014-12-07 16:38 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <m62hae$g4b$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
Hello, What i like about my scalable distributed sequential lock, is that if for example you want to implement a really fast and parallel in-memory database or a Parallel Redblack tree and a parallel AVL tree, the reader section will be much expensive than the writer section, cause in the writer side you first write the data outside the writer section and inside the writer section you just copy your pointer to the datastructure, but in the reader section you have to read the data from the memory from inside the reader section , that makes the reader section more expensive , so from the Amdahl's law this will make the parallel in-memory database that uses my scalable distributed sequential lock to scale very well(on NUMA etc.) or it will make the the parallel Redblack tree or parallel AVL tree that use my scalable distributed sequential lock to scale very well (on NUMA etc.). That's very important to know. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane,.
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
More about scalability Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-12-07 16:38 -0800 Re: More about scalability Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-12-07 17:10 -0800
csiph-web